'Too many white people' does not equate to the idea there should be no white people.
So if a white person said, "there's too many black people here," you would agree that this does not equate to the idea that there should be no black people?
'Too many white people' does not equate to the idea there should be no white people.
Imagine if this was a white person who went up there and said, "This is a space for white people and quite frankly, there's just too many people of color here." Student probably would've been expelled from the school and the university would have to dole out a huge apology about how "we treat all students equally and cherish everyone."
But since a black girl said it,her racism gets a pass. And yet people on this forum still insist that white people are not oppressedshe got death threats and had to delete her twitter account.
You really have no clue what universities are like, especially UVA.Imagine if this was a white person who went up there and said, "This is a space for white people and quite frankly, there's just too many people of color here." Student probably would've been expelled from the school and the university would have to dole out a huge apology about how "we treat all students equally and cherish everyone."
It is pretty clear you have no clue what being oppressed means. An ignorant thought experiment is not evidence of oppression.But since a black girl said it, her racism gets a pass. And yet people on this forum still insist that white people are not oppressed.
'Too many white people' does not equate to the idea there should be no white people.
"Too many black people" does not equate to the idea there should be no black people.
This new multicultural center is a replacement for their old one. An article states the mission behind the formation of the old center was 'to create a space to support underrepresented groups while cultivating an inclusive and diverse University community'.
Excluding people based on their race isn't inclusive and it reduces diversity.
You really have no clue what universities are like, especially UVA.Imagine if this was a white person who went up there and said, "This is a space for white people and quite frankly, there's just too many people of color here." Student probably would've been expelled from the school and the university would have to dole out a huge apology about how "we treat all students equally and cherish everyone."
It is pretty clear you have no clue what being oppressed means. An ignorant thought experiment is not evidence of oppression.But since a black girl said it, her racism gets a pass. And yet people on this forum still insist that white people are not oppressed.
It is a mistake to think that injecting irrelevancies furthers your argument. The point is that your ignorant thought experiments are not evidence of oppression.You really have no clue what universities are like, especially UVA.
It is pretty clear you have no clue what being oppressed means. An ignorant thought experiment is not evidence of oppression.
You must've missed this new thing we have called intersectionaity.
For example, a straight white male is all the way at the bottom of this hierarchy, whereas a black trans lesbian Muslim woman would be at the top of the hierarchy. A gay white man and a gay black man are both represented by being gay, but the black man is higher in the hierarchy because he's also black.
You were the one who said ALL the US presidents have been white, and for a reason.But since a black girl said it, her racism gets a pass. And yet people on this forum still insist that white people are not oppressed.
Neither does she. Or you, for that matter.It is pretty clear you have no clue what being oppressed means.
Well, Obama is only like half white.You were the one who said ALL the US presidents have been white
Neither does she. Or you, for that matter.It is pretty clear you have no clue what being oppressed means.
Even if he is a strawman sockpuppet troll, when he says that this girl is a racist and is getting away with it because of her skin color he is absolutely right.Hahaha, you are supporting Half-Life's arguments again! You fell right into it.
And?
It doesn't reduce diversity at the university.
It's about ensuring groups whose needs or voices may be less represented ordinarily have access to resources and space so that the overall university experience is more inclusive of the diverse population.
It came across as a prank actually. It is a really competitive thing to get your stuff to "go viral" and I guess she has somewhat succeeded. It's just another non controversial, click bait news story that trots out some silly shit seen on Tw@tter followed by quotes from the people that respond. Social media is a cesspit.
I did not even look at the video and so I did not pick up on social cues etc that could have led me in that direction. BUT now that you mention it, isn't it weird that she had her friend video the whole thing? So there is certainly some evidence of this hypothesis...
Well, if YOU said it, and since you have stated a desire to form and live in a white ethnostate, why would i NOT think you meant that?'Too many white people' does not equate to the idea there should be no white people.
So if a white person said, "there's too many black people here," you would agree that this does not equate to the idea that there should be no black people?
What was the point of you saying "too many white people" does not equal "no white people"??
It reduces it at the Multicultural Student Center, and it excludes people from it.
I know the feelings of white people do not matter, but imagine for a moment that you were white and you were in that space when this person claimed dominion over it, told people too many white people made her uncomfortable and that they did not belong, and then got applauded for it.
'Too many white people' does not equate to the idea there should be no white people.
So if a white person said, "there's too many black people here," you would agree that this does not equate to the idea that there should be no black people?
Your baseless opinion is duly noted.Neither does she. Or you, for that matter.It is pretty clear you have no clue what being oppressed means.
There is no inherent statement that white people categorically shouldn't be in the space let alone a sentiment that this somehow means white people don't have culture.
It was created to support underrepresented groups. What is so hard to understand about that? It promotes a culture of diversity and inclusion at the university.
People aren't excluded, but they should bear in mind the purpose of the space.
I am white. She didn't 'claim dominion over it';
but otherwise, why would I go there?
Would it make me uncomfortable if I were there? The answer is likely not really. At worst I may have felt mildly embarrassed or mildly irritated, but I've experienced much worse. I've lived most of my life being readily accepted into the predominate racial/ ethnic group. I don't feel deeply troubled by the fact that a small space in a university established largely to support those not in the majority might want me to consider using other spaces.
I would not feel it was a challenge to my representation inclusion in that university community. I understand what it is to want a space where you aren't the minority when nearly everywhere else you are.
There is no inherent statement that white people categorically shouldn't be in the space let alone a sentiment that this somehow means white people don't have culture.