Trump VS COVID-19 Threat

[Jimmy Higgins]

The context was that disinfectants kills the virus in around a minute. On hard surfaces. It would be great if something similar could be applied to the internals of a human body to cure the infection, not for people to ingest Dettol. Not in those exact words, but that's what the Trump meant!

Perhaps the Dems, as well as you lot would be better off if you went back to the Russian collusion hoax and the impeachment proceedings?

Well, I’m pondering just what Trump has to say for some people to say straight, “That is pretty fucking dumb.”

Just as dumb as saying Islamic terrorism has got nothing to do with Islam. Guess who?

So you have nothing to defend the statements with.

 

[angelo]

The trump imposed travel restrictions in late January, China was quick to condemn the decision by appealing to WHO, which was in China's pocket already thanks to the head of WHO which Chinese government had a huge hand in appointing. WHO recommended against travel restrictions, the US rushed to go in the opposite direction, certainly not an act of good gesture of goodwill at best by the head honchos at WHO.

When the Trump announced the US withdrawal of WHO funding this month, he said the organisation's acceptance of CPP misinformation led to a probable 20 fold increase in COVID-19 cases around the world.
Within days of the US funding freeze, the CPP stepped in to reward the organisation [WHO] that had protected it from global scrutiny.

But all that has been turned upside down by the mainstream media and the left who are attempting to place the blame solely on the Trump administration. As someone put words into the mouth of a mythical Jesus. Let those who have eyes and ears hear and see .

Aren't you going to say where you copied all this from?

EDIT: Nevermind, found it

Deleted it as it's very similar to my post. I stopped subscription to the Australian many months ago. Interesting that someone else thinks as I do. Obviously used same sources.

 

[angelo]

The trump imposed travel restrictions in late January, China was quick to condemn the decision by appealing to WHO, which was in China's pocket already thanks to the head of WHO which Chinese government had a huge hand in appointing. WHO recommended against travel restrictions, the US rushed to go in the opposite direction, certainly not an act of good gesture of goodwill at best by the head honchos at WHO.

When the Trump announced the US withdrawal of WHO funding this month, he said the organisation's acceptance of CPP misinformation led to a probable 20 fold increase in COVID-19 cases around the world.
Within days of the US funding freeze, the CPP stepped in to reward the organisation [WHO] that had protected it from global scrutiny.

But all that has been turned upside down by the mainstream media and the left who are attempting to place the blame solely on the Trump administration. As someone put words into the mouth of a mythical Jesus. Let those who have eyes and ears hear and see .

Legally, this is a copyright violation.

Intellectually, it's incoherent garbage.

I have stated on numerous occasions before about the Trumps travel restrictions in January, before WHO acted and before the Wuhan virus infected the world.

 

[angelo]

Just as dumb as saying Islamic terrorism has got nothing to do with Islam. Guess who?

So you have nothing to defend the statements with.

It's self explanatory!

 

[Patooka]

Deleted it as it's very similar to my post. I stopped subscription to the Australian many months ago. Interesting that someone else thinks as I do. Obviously used same sources.

Bullshit. The article is behind a paywall (the author is someone called Jennifer Oriel), but your first two paragraphs are word for fucking word. Real people don't use "[" or "]" as parenthesis, they only show up when you copy and paste walls of text. Coupled with the fact that you have never gone more than 3 sentences without making a snide remark (Killery, Creepy Joe, Mozzies etc) and none of that was evident in the first two paragraphs, it's pretty obvious what you did. You could at least admit it.

 

[angelo]

Deleted it as it's very similar to my post. I stopped subscription to the Australian many months ago. Interesting that someone else thinks as I do. Obviously used same sources.

Bullshit. The article is behind a paywall (the author is someone called Jennifer Oriel), but your first two paragraphs are word for fucking word. Real people don't use "[" or "]" as parenthesis, they only show up when you copy and paste walls of text. Coupled with the fact that you have never gone more than 3 sentences without making a snide remark (Killery, Creepy Joe, Mozzies etc) and none of that was evident in the first two paragraphs, it's pretty obvious what you did. You could at least admit it.

Here are the first two sentences. The trump imposed travel restrictions in late January, China was quick to condemn the decision by appealing to WHO, which was in China's pocket already thanks to the head of WHO which Chinese government had a huge hand in appointing. WHO recommended against travel restrictions, the US rushed to go in the opposite direction, certainly not an act of good gesture of goodwill at best by the head honchos at WHO. WTF is the evidence that they're word for word with this Jennifer Oriel? I refuse to pay a red cent to read something behind a paywall.

Here is a timeline of events proving Trump restricted travel to and from China on the 31st of January.

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020...tion-coronavirus-actions-200414131306831.html

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

Just as dumb as saying Islamic terrorism has got nothing to do with Islam. Guess who?

So you have nothing to defend the statements with.

It's self explanatory!

Yes, it is a derail because you have nothing. Even when the President suggests his world renowned pandemic squad (the last bastion of competence left in his administration) to look into shining a very powerful light through the skin to kill the virus and to ponder with them about looking into disinfectant internally ["injection"] because it works so well on surfaces, you can't just say 'gosh that was dumb' because you are just sold on Trump. You've psychologically invested too much to pull back now.

Yes, all of that is self explanatory.

 

[Patooka]

Deleted it as it's very similar to my post. I stopped subscription to the Australian many months ago. Interesting that someone else thinks as I do. Obviously used same sources.

Bullshit. The article is behind a paywall (the author is someone called Jennifer Oriel), but your first two paragraphs are word for fucking word. Real people don't use "[" or "]" as parenthesis, they only show up when you copy and paste walls of text. Coupled with the fact that you have never gone more than 3 sentences without making a snide remark (Killery, Creepy Joe, Mozzies etc) and none of that was evident in the first two paragraphs, it's pretty obvious what you did. You could at least admit it.

Here are the first two sentences. The trump imposed travel restrictions in late January, China was quick to condemn the decision by appealing to WHO, which was in China's pocket already thanks to the head of WHO which Chinese government had a huge hand in appointing. WHO recommended against travel restrictions, the US rushed to go in the opposite direction, certainly not an act of good gesture of goodwill at best by the head honchos at WHO. WTF is the evidence that they're word for word with this Jennifer Oriel? I refuse to pay a red cent to read something behind a paywall.

You're right. There are a couple of very minor differences, I'll only highlight part of the text that's relevant:



So it's pretty clear these aren't your words and you got them somewhere else. So not a straight up copy and paste. Just a copy and paste with some sprinkles. In other words a difference without a distinction.

 

[bigfield]

Here are the first two sentences. The trump imposed travel restrictions in late January, China was quick to condemn the decision by appealing to WHO, which was in China's pocket already thanks to the head of WHO which Chinese government had a huge hand in appointing. WHO recommended against travel restrictions, the US rushed to go in the opposite direction, certainly not an act of good gesture of goodwill at best by the head honchos at WHO. WTF is the evidence that they're word for word with this Jennifer Oriel? I refuse to pay a red cent to read something behind a paywall.

You're right. There are a couple of very minor differences, I'll only highlight part of the text that's relevant:

View attachment 27359

So it's pretty clear these aren't your words and you got them somewhere else. So not a straight up copy and paste. Just a copy and paste with some sprinkles. In other words a difference without a distinction.

@angelo knows he fucked up, because he deleted his post. That's about as close as we'll ever get to an admission of dishonesty.

I'm pretty sure angelo plagiarised from a printed copy of the Australian, because it's not a copy-paste job. For instance, angelo thinks the acronym for the Chinese Communist Party is CPP, and he abbreviated WHO when the original wrote the organisation's name in full.

 

[Keith&Co.]

I refuse to pay a red cent to read something behind a paywall.

Are Aussie pennies red?
And is 'one red cent' a common phrase in Australia?

My grandfather was always denying he'd spend 'one red cent' for any crap, it just seems odd to hear from somewhere so distant....

 

[bigfield]

I refuse to pay a red cent to read something behind a paywall.

Are Aussie pennies red?
And is 'one red cent' a common phrase in Australia?

Australians use a lot of Americanisms without realising it.

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

link

Meanwhile a couple thousand people were back at it, working on spreading Covid-19 to their loved ones.

In late February, the 78-year-old day-care center operator had a high fever and cough and was so fatigued she could barely move. She said her doctor ruled out the flu but wasn’t sure what she was suffering from. “In my case, it put me down for about 24 hours. And then I had a cough for three weeks, and then I was fine,” Ezzell said.

What has not been fine, she said, is what has happened to her family in the past month. Most of her children and grandchildren work in the service industry, including in salons and restaurants, and all had been laid off several weeks ago as Wisconsin ordered nonessential businesses to close and residents to stay at home to stop the spread of the coronavirus. Out of work and with little savings, they were struggling to pay the bills.

“I am not saying coronavirus isn’t serious,” Ezzell said. “But I have seen a lot of plagues and viruses and all kinds of junk go through in my lifetime, and I have never seen the government close itself down over something I believe I had and resembles a bad flu. It’s ruining people’s lives, especially young people who are just getting started. They need to get back to work.”

- I'm not saying it isn't serious, but I am!

- I think I had the disease and I didn't die, therefore, it isn't bad.

- Look, who hasn't been through a plague.

- The government has never done this in my life to this point, therefore because they are doing this is in no way an indication of how much more serious this disease actually is compared to other things.

- People have to work or they will die!

What seems odd is that Millennials have had to deal with unique challenges that the nation has put upon them. These far-right wingers didn't give a fuck about all of that five months ago. In fact, they typically mocked them. But now... they are all holding hands together to get the millennial (and younger) out to work.

 

[blastula]

Here are the first two sentences. The trump imposed travel restrictions in late January, China was quick to condemn the decision by appealing to WHO, which was in China's pocket already thanks to the head of WHO which Chinese government had a huge hand in appointing. WHO recommended against travel restrictions, the US rushed to go in the opposite direction, certainly not an act of good gesture of goodwill at best by the head honchos at WHO. WTF is the evidence that they're word for word with this Jennifer Oriel? I refuse to pay a red cent to read something behind a paywall.

You're right. There are a couple of very minor differences, I'll only highlight part of the text that's relevant:

View attachment 27359

So it's pretty clear these aren't your words and you got them somewhere else. So not a straight up copy and paste. Just a copy and paste with some sprinkles. In other words a difference without a distinction.

@angelo knows he fucked up, because he deleted his post. That's about as close as we'll ever get to an admission of dishonesty.

I'm pretty sure angelo plagiarised from a printed copy of the Australian, because it's not a copy-paste job. For instance, angelo thinks the acronym for the Chinese Communist Party is CPP, and he abbreviated WHO when the original wrote the organisation's name in full.

There's no way angelo plagiarised since he stopped subscription to the Australian many months ago. He said so himself, so stop the persecution. It's your new hoax!

And really, would angelo plagiarise from such a stupid source? That doesn't sound like him at all.

 

[blastula]

Trump defends work habits, attacks media in series of tweets | TheHill
notes

Donald J. Trump on Twitter: "I work from early in the morning until late at night, haven’t left the White House in many months (except to launch Hospital Ship Comfort) in order to take care of Trade Deals, Military Rebuilding etc., and then I read a phony story in the failing @nytimes about my work...." / Twitter
then
Donald J. Trump on Twitter: "....schedule and eating habits, written by a third rate reporter who knows nothing about me. I will often be in the Oval Office late into the night & read & see that I am angrily eating a hamburger & Diet Coke in my bedroom. People with me are always stunned. Anything to demean!" / Twitter

Some who speaks gibberish, please translate, "I will often be in the Oval Office late into the night & read & see that I am angrily eating a hamburger & Diet Coke in my bedroom."

 

[Keith&Co.]

Some who speaks gibberish, please translate, "I will often be in the Oval Office late into the night

i am working, always working, because i promised the voters i'd be their hardworkingest.

& read & see that I am angrily eating a hamburger & Diet Coke in my bedroom."

And my idea of 'working' apparently includes reading the fake news, that i do not have time for, and often this news, the fake news, describe me instead of working, for the voters, but in my bedroom, eating junk food. Faking fakers. I am working.

 

[T.G.G. Moogly]

Just as dumb as saying Islamic terrorism has got nothing to do with Islam. Guess who?

And Irish catholic terrorism has got nothing to do with catholicism.

But we dare not risk assuming that this is true, so we must treat all catholics as probable terrorists. Including any self declared apostates - I mean, if they admit to being former residents of (or decended from residents of) a catholic nation, doubtless they are at the very least supportive of terrorism. Most probably.

Best we deport or intern them for the security of our country. Right?

When a Trumpo supporter comes along with these type replies they think themselves oh so clever and how everyone will be oh so impressed with their smartness. This is why we keep hearing this tripe. The smartness, it's so smart.

 

[Keith&Co.]

Donald J. Trump on Twitter: "I work from early in the morning until late at night, haven’t left the White House in many months (except to launch Hospital Ship Comfort)

Uh, no. The Comfort was 'launched' in 1976.
You 'saw them off' on this latest mission, but launching is that first time they roll the keel into the water. Distinct from the commissioning, or any old deployment.
People get wet.

But this is a military genius, who knows more than his admirals about the military.

 

[Patooka]

Donald J. Trump on Twitter: "I work from early in the morning until late at night, haven’t left the White House in many months (except to launch Hospital Ship Comfort)

Uh, no. The Comfort was 'launched' in 1976.
You 'saw them off' on this latest mission, but launching is that first time they roll the keel into the water. Distinct from the commissioning, or any old deployment.
People get wet.

But this is a military genius, who knows more than his admirals about the military.

Name one Admiral with the vision to think of shooting down boats as a strategy.

 

[hurtinbuckaroo]

This reminds me of the Twilight Zone episode "It's a Good Life". In it, a boy named Anthony Fremont can read people's minds, and banish them to a certain cornfield. Everybody in his hometown lives in fear of him, always assuring how much they like what he does and what a good boy he is. Because if they don't, it's off to the cornfield.

This isn't the first time SCROTUS and Anthony have been tied together. You should read the short story; it's far more frightening than the TZ episode.

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

Trump defends work habits, attacks media in series of tweets | TheHill
notes

Donald J. Trump on Twitter: "I work from early in the morning until late at night, haven’t left the White House in many months (except to launch Hospital Ship Comfort) in order to take care of Trade Deals, Military Rebuilding etc., and then I read a phony story in the failing @nytimes about my work...." / Twitter
then
Donald J. Trump on Twitter: "....schedule and eating habits, written by a third rate reporter who knows nothing about me. I will often be in the Oval Office late into the night & read & see that I am angrily eating a hamburger & Diet Coke in my bedroom. People with me are always stunned. Anything to demean!" / Twitter

Some who speaks gibberish, please translate, "I will often be in the Oval Office late into the night & read & see that I am angrily eating a hamburger & Diet Coke in my bedroom."

So he was in the Oval Office when he came up with the idea of shining powerful lights at people and injecting them with disinfectant, not while angrily eating a hamburger in the bedroom.