Undercover Footage Shows Clinton Operatives Admit To Inciting "Anarchy" At Trump Rallies

[untermensche]

Anybody who takes anything from this proven liar and manipulator of video tape seriously is beyond help.

 

[whichphilosophy]

An unreliable source should be discredited by investigation in the same way a credible source is validated.

Why?
Does it work that way anywhere in reality? When a kid lies so much you assume that he's lying, do you still investigate his excuses for why he didn't do the homework? OR to you begin to ignore his stories UNLESS AND UNTIL he, himself, can provide better evidence for his claims in the first place?
Professional liars, cryptozoologists, creationists... Let them produce extraordinary evidence for their less credible claims.

This is true. In an investigation he would have to provide more than a video for he has the burden of proof. Thus such an investigation would not take long if he can't come up with something concrete. It will also make a fool of such persons where the claims are unsubstantiated.

 

[Keith&Co.]

Why?
Does it work that way anywhere in reality? When a kid lies so much you assume that he's lying, do you still investigate his excuses for why he didn't do the homework? OR to you begin to ignore his stories UNLESS AND UNTIL he, himself, can provide better evidence for his claims in the first place?
Professional liars, cryptozoologists, creationists... Let them produce extraordinary evidence for their less credible claims.

This is true. In an investigation he would have to provide more than a video for he has the burden of proof. Thus such an investigation would not take long if he can't come up with something concrete.

Wait, with OUR court system? He could throw up all sorts of delays and obfuscations, plus counter suits and counter claims and insisting at the top of his press conference that he's defending sources or the constitution...

It will also make a fool of such persons where the claims are unsubstantiated.

Or he'll settle out of court with any admission of wrong-doing sealed away from the press so he's not prevented from making yet another film claiming yet more lies.

But before he goes down, the simple fact of an investigation will give him more free press and more ways to spread his lies.

I personally don't think he's done anything to deserve that much attention.

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

Why?
Does it work that way anywhere in reality? When a kid lies so much you assume that he's lying, do you still investigate his excuses for why he didn't do the homework? OR to you begin to ignore his stories UNLESS AND UNTIL he, himself, can provide better evidence for his claims in the first place?
Professional liars, cryptozoologists, creationists... Let them produce extraordinary evidence for their less credible claims.

This is true. In an investigation he would have to provide more than a video for he has the burden of proof. Thus such an investigation would not take long if he can't come up with something concrete. It will also make a fool of such persons where the claims are unsubstantiated.

Umm, how many more times must this guy be exposed for being an asshole lying son of a bitch?

 

[ZiprHead]

Alex Jones and his conspiracy-obsessed website InfoWars prompted a series of disruptions at pro-Clinton rallies this week by offering $5,000 to anyone who can be heard shouting “Bill Clinton is a rapist.”

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

That is three weeks ago. This election has been so fucked up, this isn't really news.

 

[Underseer]

They sent people to Trump rallies to express contrary opinions. Republicans do the same thing.

The difference between Democrats and Republicans is that Republicans respond to this with extreme violence.

So if Democrats are bad for doing this, why aren't Republicans bad for doing the same thing?

And why aren't Republicans bad for responding to this with violence?

 

[Underseer]

Alex Jones and his conspiracy-obsessed website InfoWars prompted a series of disruptions at pro-Clinton rallies this week by offering $5,000 to anyone who can be heard shouting “Bill Clinton is a rapist.”

Your article is critical of Trump supporters, therefore Trump supporters are justified in beating up protesters! [/Conservolibertarian]

By the way, a rightist actually used this argument on me.

 

[Jason Harvestdancer]

Alex Jones and his conspiracy-obsessed website InfoWars prompted a series of disruptions at pro-Clinton rallies this week by offering $5,000 to anyone who can be heard shouting “Bill Clinton is a rapist.”

Your article is critical of Trump supporters, therefore Trump supporters are justified in beating up protesters! [/Conservolibertarian]

By the way, a rightist actually used this argument on me.

Why are you so desperate to have libertarians join you in supporting Trump? He's an authoritarian like you, and a conservative like you, so there's nothing there to appeal to libertarians.

As far as I can tell, you're the only Trump supporter on this forum.