NotreDame15
And Our Hearts Forever, Love Thee Notre Dame
I have elevated myself above your hyper paranoia, obsessive compulsive, hyper anxiety
You're a riot, kid.
“Come on pal, tell me something I don’t know.” Gordon Gecco.
I have elevated myself above your hyper paranoia, obsessive compulsive, hyper anxiety
You're a riot, kid.
Terms of use prohibit most of it.I have elevated myself above your hyper paranoia, obsessive compulsive, hyper anxiety
You're a riot, kid.
“Come on pal, tell me something I don’t know.” Gordon Gecco.
Terms of use prohibit most of it.I have elevated myself above your hyper paranoia, obsessive compulsive, hyper anxiety
You're a riot, kid.
“Come on pal, tell me something I don’t know.” Gordon Gecco.
Nah, just EFFECTIVELY.Not voting isn’t factually or in reality ever a vote for any candidate.
Okay sonny, I'll add it to the burgeoning list of shit you know that ain't so.No, re-read what I wrote! I already knew that you’d have a inundation of enlightened expletives strung together that violate “terms of use.”
Nah, just EFFECTIVELY.Not voting isn’t factually or in reality ever a vote for any candidate.
No, not you personally. You are insignificant.
Except insofar as your laziness inspires the same in others.
You should be required to vote, or forego public services.
It's your fucking DUTY, and the duty of every asshole living on the grid.
Show up and write yourself in since you seem to be your favorite person. But don't try to represent by your actions that selecting non-participation is a responsible course. It's not, in a democracy.
But it IS advantageous to fascists.
Okay sonny, I'll add it to the burgeoning list of shit you know that ain't so.
Perhaps I will regret asking this question, but how was Ms. Harris a threat to the Constitution?If that were the case, it betrays your consideration or alleged care about the Constitution and Constitutional Law. Trump didn't merely suck, he tried to steal an election. He conspired to get multiple State Legislatures and at least one Secretary of State (GA) to reverse the election results. He then conspired to do an end run on January 6th, both inside the chambers by having the Vice President declare the election invalid and outside by amassing a riot.Yet, while perhaps true, doesn’t necessarily change that for me Trump sucked and Harris sucked, and the profound logic that I perhaps vote for a candidate that sucks by my estimation but because they suck less than the other condidate, but still suck nonetheless, is not a sensible proposition presently.We can remove the word "moral" and go with Constitutional... and how Trump's unconstitutional move to steal the election in 2020 made him Constitutionally unfit for the office. Yes, his age and residency and having only served one term didn't disqualify him, but his refusal to abide by the election results was a violation of his oath.“Maybe you could knock off the useless blather” and cease treating your perception of the presidential election as a epic struggle between moral and immoral, like a religious fundy, as the only perception. Let’s begin there.
Next, if both candidates suck for me, regardless of whatever source for your morality by which you seek to impose and evaluate other people, then it doesn’t make any sense for me to vote for either, your personal moral evaluations being irrelevant.
One might not like Harris's politics, but when she lost the election, there wasn't 10 weeks of brazenly false claims and accusations, followed by a riot (zero actually court cases regarding fraud filed by the guy with standing) to change the results in Congress.
Any scale that can weigh the ills of the two candidates as being anywhere near equal is in desperate need of recalibration.
If one were to equate that with whatever Harris has or hasn't done as making they both "suck", all the while alleging to care about Constitutional Law is either wildly partisan or full of it.
I didn’t entertain any notion the “ills of the two candidates as being anywhere near equal,” and no such consideration ever factored in my dislike for both Trump and Harris. I didn’t vote for any presidential candidate in 2020 either, as neither Trump or Biden weren palatable to me.that were the case, it betrays your consideration or alleged care about the Constitution and Constitutional Law.
That assumes Harris wasn’t a threat to the Constitution and Constitutional Law, which for me and my proclivities she was such a threat.
Not a false dichotomy, but rather a Hobson's Choice.And your logic assumes a false dichotomy, it’s either vote against Trump and for Harris or not care about the Constitution.
Yeah you have the freedom to go off grid and not participate. You don’t have the right to freeload off everyone else by shirking all responsibility for the maintenance of the systems that keep your sorry ass alive.Yes, hypocritically deride “fascists” while you fascistically take away the freedom not to vote
Not a false dichotomy, but rather a Hobson's Choice.And your logic assumes a false dichotomy, it’s either vote against Trump and for Harris or not care about the Constitution.
Yeah you have the freedom to go off grid and not participate. You don’t have the right to freeload off everyone else by shirking all responsibility for the maintenance of the systems that keep your sorry ass alive.Yes, hypocritically deride “fascists” while you fascistically take away the freedom not to vote
That word “fascist” doesn’t mean what you think it means. Democracy demands that if you want to do things involving the commons there are things that you “fascistically” (sic) are required not to not do.
If you want to drive on public roads you need to fascistically not refrain from getting a license. If you make money you don’t have the freedom to fail to file a tax return. Etc etc. Grow the fuck up.
That word “fascist” doesn’t mean what you think it means.
You don’t have the right to freeload off everyone else by shirking all responsibility for the maintenance of the systems that keep your sorry ass alive.
Democracy demands
If you want to drive on public roads you need to fascistically not refrain from getting a license. If you make money you don’t have the freedom to fail to file a tax return. Etc etc. Grow the fuck up.
Blah blah blah. Decades ago when I was 18 I would have agreed with you.your knee jerk reaction of taking away a freedom
Blah blah blah. Decades ago when I was 18 I would have agreed with you.
I have considered the matter for longer than you’ve been alive; there is nothing kneejerk about it.
Grow the fuck up.
So did I - I figured they’d applaud my surf bum/hippie lifestyle as independent-minded freethinking.When I was growing up in the 60's and 70's and to an extent into the 80's I saw the Supreme Court as the protector of civil rights.
Blah blah blah. Decades ago when I was 18 I would have agreed with you.your knee jerk reaction of taking away a freedom
I have considered the matter for longer than you’ve been alive; there is nothing kneejerk about it.
Grow the fuck up.
Actually yes. if the guy who violated his Constitutional Oath by conspiring in multiple plots to steal an election can only be defeated by supporting a Democrat, if one really does care about the Constitution has a Hobson's Choice in the voting booth.Not really.Not a false dichotomy, but rather a Hobson's Choice.And your logic assumes a false dichotomy, it’s either vote against Trump and for Harris or not care about the Constitution.
FYI, your posts are devolving into a different persona.Ostensibly this is let’s blame others for a candidate I liked but many more disliked and didn’t vote at all. This is on Harris and her inability to arouse more to vote for her. Essentially, she simply wasn’t a good product to many voting consumers, which is on her.
What is the constitutional basis for the decision by SCOTUS that it's okay for presidents to break the law if it's part of their duties?
Not really.Not a false dichotomy, but rather a Hobson's Choice.And your logic assumes a false dichotomy, it’s either vote against Trump and for Harris or not care about the Constitution.
FYI, your posts are devolving into a different persona.Ostensibly this is let’s blame others for a candidate I liked but many more disliked and didn’t vote at all. This is on Harris and her inability to arouse more to vote for her. Essentially, she simply wasn’t a good product to many voting consumers, which is on her.
Actually yes. if the guy who violated his Constitutional Oath by conspiring in multiple plots to steal an election can only be defeated by supporting a Democrat, if one really does care about the Constitution has a Hobson's Choice in the voting booth.
FYI, your posts are devolving into a different persona.
CWOT.