NobleSavage
Veteran Member
I tried to convey as much. I'm just saying if we get UBI it will be the new poverty.
Whatever they want. That's part of the point.
there will still be a segment who have nothing better to do than drink alcohol and make babies.
First of all, this is really just a rightwing strawman along the same lines of arguing against welfare by pretending most people on it are lazy parasites. In reality that's almost a complete non-issue, just like it would be with a UBI. People who do nothing but drink alcohol and make babies don't exist for one; and people who do *almost* nothing but drink alcohol and make babies do so for reasons completely unrelated to whether or not they get a government paycheck every month. If anything, if everyone gets a generous enough amount of money from the government, these kinds of people might use that money to improve their conditions in life to the point where they discover that there's more to it than drinking and fucking after their 9-to-5 mindnumbing factory job.
Secondly; even if they still just drank and made babies; that wouldn't actually be a serious problem for the economy at large. After all, they'd be spending substantially more money on alcohol and food and what not; and even if they'd quit their job and live off just the UBI, well I certainly don't think you're inclined to believe these people hold highly productive jobs essential to the economy to begin with.
The only questions are: how is UBI to funded? And:is there sufficient Political Will to implement it?
The big retailers only have interest in getting welfare to the poor, not everyone. Besides an UBI would mean they would have to start paying their own workers more (until they are all replaced by robots anyway). I don't think they can be counted to push for UBI, but they might support it if gains enough political momentum otherwise.The only questions are: how is UBI to funded? And:is there sufficient Political Will to implement it?
No problem, we'll just add it to the debt. I figure the Political Will might come from the evil corporations when they figure out they need someone to buy their products. The big retailers are making moves to get more welfare for the people.
The only questions are: how is UBI to funded? And:is there sufficient Political Will to implement it?
No problem, we'll just add it to the debt. I figure the Political Will might come from the evil corporations when they figure out they need someone to buy their products. The big retailers are making moves to get more welfare for the people.
A mister Mark Walker Proposes a 14% Value added tax on all goods and services to give a guaranteed $10,000 basic income to everyone. It sounds like it would work but of course it would impact the middle class the hardest so I think this is the wrong way to go.The only questions are: how is UBI to funded? And:is there sufficient Political Will to implement it?
No problem, we'll just add it to the debt. I figure the Political Will might come from the evil corporations when they figure out they need someone to buy their products. The big retailers are making moves to get more welfare for the people.
So wait.
Now you're concerned about the national debt?
You didn't seem concerned when we put future generations trillions in debt to pay for tax breaks and corporate handouts.
You didn't seem concerned about the debt when we talked about raising the minimum wage so that corporations can stop mooching off the taxpayer.
Oh. Right. It only counts as adding to the debt if we spend it on commoners. If we give millions to commoners, that creates a crushing burden for future generations, but if we give billions in handouts to the aristocracy, that extra money is created by magic and therefore does not count against the national debt. Sorry, but I forgot about the details of conservative economic beliefs.
The big retailers only have interest in getting welfare to the poor, not everyone. Besides an UBI would mean they would have to start paying their own workers more (until they are all replaced by robots anyway). I don't think they can be counted to push for UBI, but they might support it if gains enough political momentum otherwise.No problem, we'll just add it to the debt. I figure the Political Will might come from the evil corporations when they figure out they need someone to buy their products. The big retailers are making moves to get more welfare for the people.
A mister Mark Walker Proposes a 14% Value added tax on all goods and services to give a guaranteed $10,000 basic income to everyone. It sounds like it would work but of course it would impact the middle class the hardest so I think this is the wrong way to go.The only questions are: how is UBI to funded? And:is there sufficient Political Will to implement it?
http://jetpress.org/v24/walker.htm
Better raise the minimum wage to help them out.
Goodness forbid we stop giving billions in handouts to already profitable corporations. I mean, how can we call ourselves "small government" types if we stop giving away billions in handouts to those who obviously don't need it?
It's the letter U in UBI that Walmart doesn't care about. It sells cheap consumer goods to the poor, so it would be in favor of subsidizing them, but Walmart has no particular reason to support a universal basic income. The push for that has to come from elsewhere.The big retailers only have interest in getting welfare to the poor, not everyone. Besides an UBI would mean they would have to start paying their own workers more (until they are all replaced by robots anyway). I don't think they can be counted to push for UBI, but they might support it if gains enough political momentum otherwise.
When Walmart is about to lay off 2.2 million people and replace them with robots they will be all for UBI.
It's the letter U in UBI that Walmart doesn't care about. It sells cheap consumer goods to the poor, so it would be in favor of subsidizing them, but Walmart has no particular reason to support a universal basic income. The push for that has to come from elsewhere.When Walmart is about to lay off 2.2 million people and replace them with robots they will be all for UBI.
This is how Alaska does it.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/09/17/us-usa-dividend-alaska-idUSKBN0HC2E320140917
It's the letter U in UBI that Walmart doesn't care about. It sells cheap consumer goods to the poor, so it would be in favor of subsidizing them, but Walmart has no particular reason to support a universal basic income. The push for that has to come from elsewhere.
It isn't just gonna be the poor people getting laid off. This is going to effect every everyone. Automation is out for all the high skill jobs as well. If you get payed a lot of money to sit in front of a computer...look out. IBM's Watson has a part time gig kicking doctor ass diagnosing and treating cancer. And Watson isn't restricted to a box in NYC, anyone can use the API http://www.ibm.com/smarterplanet/us/en/ibmwatson/developercloud/ A bunch of formerly upper middle class people are going to finding themselves shopping at Walmart.
I don't want a damn VAT tax. We have plenty of taxes. Just raise the ones we have or cut back expenses.
I don't want a damn VAT tax. We have plenty of taxes. Just raise the ones we have or cut back expenses.
Who is to pay the taxes to fund the UBI given that the majority of those who normally would be employed and paying taxes have been displaced by automated systems?
Who is to pay the taxes to fund the UBI given that the majority of those who normally would be employed and paying taxes have been displaced by automated systems?
Capital gains. Corporate Taxes.