What will make you move to Canada?

[fast]

If Trump won, I'd have to seriously consider it. W wasn't good. But Trump and the subsequent shit after him could make America inhospitable. It'd be something to have two relatively good Democrat presidencies followed by needless Republican presidencies. Sure... the US has had unprecedented peace time growth under Clinton, but let's elect the former alcoholic that can't speak good instead of Gore... he's a good manager.

Now we are looking at, sure Obama helped America rise up from the Great Recession and employment is doing pretty well, but fuck it, let's give the White House to a sociopathic narcissist who has almost no handle on domestic or foreign policy... he is a good manager and great Tweeter!

Bruce Peninsula would be quite nice, though I'd settle for Wawa... Marathon if you pull my arm hard enough. I can open a restaurant or something.

Um, have you been to Canada?

Fuck mosquitoes! It's the black flies that are awful... they are almost as bad as wasps. They hate life and want everyone to suffer.

You say, "sociopathic narcissist" as if that couldn't make for just the right ingredients to mix things up. The unity and community growth is often stronger after a disaster. Isn't unity and prosperity what they keep yearning for? Granted, that's a bit like wanting a hurricane to hit for the benefits of community rebuilding afterwords, but in the face of stagnation and the perpetual deterioration within our current climate of relations, having Trump may be a blessing in disguise.

People of walks of life would come together if we were invaded by an alien race, and if we are lucky to have Trump, there will be many positives directly attributable to him (that many would be grateful for, at least by those that can compartmentalize). Others would focus on the negatives and ban together as if to overthrow an alien invasion.

Wouldn't it be great to keep all the positive real changes he can bring, even if it means picking up the pieces in the wake of what will go wrong? This isn't some candidate puking, "yes we can," with dispicable overtones. Trump can more than likely mix things up, paving way for both good things we need and bad things we can fix. The alternative is to endure the same ole promises gone unmet decade after decade.

I know, I know, intentionally setting the house on fire and running for the hose isn't the smartest way to get rid of mosquitoes, but it'd sure make for an interesting tale to pass along to future generations, as a lesson that Americans are so great that we can defy the odds of collapsing under our own stupidity of putting a sociopathic narcissist at the helm.

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

He isn't going to destroy America, he is destroying our political system.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[fast]

He isn't going to destroy America, he is destroying our political system.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That's a bad thing?

Well, I guess if it isn't being replaced with something better ... .

 

[Under the Rose]

There black flies in Michigan UP, but they're only around a couple of weeks.

Yes, black flies are a fact of life. When we have a decent summer, they show up soon after the 1st of July and they are with us until freeze up, which is late October, early November most years. They go to ground when the frost starts but come out later in the day. They are not gone until the snow stays on the ground.

 

[Horatio Parker]

There black flies in Michigan UP, but they're only around a couple of weeks.

Yes, black flies are a fact of life. When we have a decent summer, they show up soon after the 1st of July and they are with us until freeze up, which is late October, early November most years. They go to ground when the frost starts but come out later in the day. They are not gone until the snow stays on the ground.

Wow those are some tough flies…Michigan black flies in the Keweenaw come in June for 2-3 weeks.

 

[whichphilosophy]

I think a well paid job will be an incentive to move to Canada or any other place.

 

[Bomb#20]

I don't believe that I wrote that everywhere or anywhere in Canada is where I'd go but instead to those kinds of locations that would be absent Trump, his minions, and mosquitoes. For example, near to Resolute.

As of right now, it's raining in Resolute, the temperature is 2 degrees Celsius, and "Mosquito Activity" is reported. (Expected to be down to "LOW mosquito activity" by morning. )

Also, check out the list of Nunavut communities this outfit sells its services in.

 

[Bomb#20]

I know, I know, intentionally setting the house on fire and running for the hose isn't the smartest way to get rid of mosquitoes, but it'd sure make for an interesting tale to pass along to future generations, as a lesson that Americans are so great that we can defy the odds of collapsing under our own stupidity of putting a sociopathic narcissist at the helm.

You say this as though whether we put a sociopathic narcissist at the helm or not is still up for debate. That ship has sailed, my friend.

 

[Bomb#20]

Not always. They tend to put on jackets when it reaches -20 degrees.

Does it ever get that cold (-20 American degrees, -29 Centrifuge) in that there Toronto.

Speaking as a former resident, yup.

 

[Valjean]

He isn't going to destroy America, he is destroying our political system.

What's the difference?

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

He isn't going to destroy America, he is destroying our political system.

What's the difference?

We recovered from the W Admin... the Middle East not so much, but the US has in part. Trump is raising the bar on insanity that Palin put up in the start. If he were to win after all he has said and done, it becomes The System of Dr. Tarr and Prof. Fether.

 

[Don2 (Don1 Revised)]

I don't believe that I wrote that everywhere or anywhere in Canada is where I'd go but instead to those kinds of locations that would be absent Trump, his minions, and mosquitoes. For example, near to Resolute.

As of right now, it's raining in Resolute, the temperature is 2 degrees Celsius, and "Mosquito Activity" is reported. (Expected to be down to "LOW mosquito activity" by morning. )

Also, check out the list of Nunavut communities this outfit sells its services in.

Assuming accuweather.com actually knows there is low activity of mosquitoes in Resolute and not using some inaccurate predictions, they do not give an explanation of what "low activity" means. Does it mean "hibernating?" One would think so since mosquitoes hibernate, do not breed, and do not bite in very cold weather. As for your second link, it's a company with an 888 number that offers services to all areas of Canada, i.e. all provinces. You don't actually know if they "sell" their services in NU as much as you know that they "offer" their services to all provinces.

As an aside, the northern species of mosquitoes are not the ones spreading Zika nor would Zika be expected to be spread by mosquitoes in cold temperatures. The risks of getting Zika are orders of magnitude less (if not impossible) in Resolute than in Connecticut.

However, like I mentioned in the op, if it were only about mosquitoes spreading Zika even at an epidemic level, I'd just stay in-doors. So it is already established that I would accept some risk.

I am not writing a dissertation on this, though, and don't plan to defend ad infinitum what I wrote. Instead, it was a question evidenced by the op title and follow-up question at the end. You seem to be much more interested in having an argument and poking sticks than answering.

 

[fast]

I know, I know, intentionally setting the house on fire and running for the hose isn't the smartest way to get rid of mosquitoes, but it'd sure make for an interesting tale to pass along to future generations, as a lesson that Americans are so great that we can defy the odds of collapsing under our own stupidity of putting a sociopathic narcissist at the helm.

You say this as though whether we put a sociopathic narcissist at the helm or not is still up for debate. That ship has sailed, my friend.

I's-uh been-drinkin' again, so maybe (as I type one letter at a time on an Ipad), this should be taken with 2 & 2/3 grains of salt, but to mize way of thinkin', there is no evidence (at least not of the kind that would support a sound deductive argument reminiscent of one that guarantees the conclusion that Trump (our very honest Mr. Trump that to the inferior thinkers actually has integrity beyond the imagination of liberals) will lose.

You make it sound (and I hear the sounds) as if all but hope is lost, but in absence of clear evidentiary evidence, do we not look (and pay attention to that which we look) (and properly consider and attempt to accurately weigh that to which we look) at, namely, indicators that more than merely suggest the direction we're taking? What I'm saying is that it's possible, but not just merely possible, that Trump stands more than a negligible chance of becoming the next president of the country between Canada and the future beautiful (oh so beautiful) wall.

Why do you have such great certainty and confidence that Trump's chances of winning the presidency is nil? Is is because of what you want to see? Is it because of some perhaps reasonable belief that he would not be good for us? Are there some polling numbers and general sense of having a pulse on the views of voting citizens? What could possibly be factored in to your thinking that elevates your confidence so high?

 

[Don2 (Don1 Revised)]

Um, Guys...

What will make you move to Canada?

...
...

Okay, so how about you?

 

[fast]

Um, Guys...

What will make you move to Canada?

...
...

Okay, so how about you?

Women.

 

[Don2 (Don1 Revised)]

Um, Guys...

What will make you move to Canada?

...
...

Okay, so how about you?

Women.

What's wrong with the women in South Carolina?

[I can't believe I typed that].

 

[James Brown]

Want to Move to Canada If Trump Wins? Not So Fast


How to Move to Canada If Trump Wins, By a Person Who Moved to Canada When Bush Won

 

[Bomb#20]

You say this as though whether we put a sociopathic narcissist at the helm or not is still up for debate. That ship has sailed, my friend.

I's-uh been-drinkin' again, so maybe (as I type one letter at a time on an Ipad), this should be taken with 2 & 2/3 grains of salt, but to mize way of thinkin', there is no evidence (at least not of the kind that would support a sound deductive argument reminiscent of one that guarantees the conclusion that Trump (our very honest Mr. Trump that to the inferior thinkers actually has integrity beyond the imagination of liberals) will lose.

If I take your meaning correctly through the fog of presumably-beer-generated mismatched parentheses, you appear to have jumped to the conclusion that I was forecasting the election outcome. Not a bit of it.

You make it sound (and I hear the sounds) as if all but hope is lost, but in absence of clear evidentiary evidence, do we not look (and pay attention to that which we look) (and properly consider and attempt to accurately weigh that to which we look) at, namely, indicators that more than merely suggest the direction we're taking? What I'm saying is that it's possible, but not just merely possible, that Trump stands more than a negligible chance of becoming the next president of the country between Canada and the future beautiful (oh so beautiful) wall.

Why do you have such great certainty and confidence that Trump's chances of winning the presidency is nil?

For them as are able to find anything to hope for in the indisputable uncertainties of voter behavior, by all means may they keep their hopes up to the bitter (and it will be bitter) end. I merely point out that yet-unknown running-mate choices, people whose dogs told them to assassinate presidential candidates, and the vagaries of meteorite trajectories, are sounder bases for hope in a nation that has already voted to put a sociopathic narcissist at the helm.

 

[fast]

I's-uh been-drinkin' again, so maybe (as I type one letter at a time on an Ipad), this should be taken with 2 & 2/3 grains of salt, but to mize way of thinkin', there is no evidence (at least not of the kind that would support a sound deductive argument reminiscent of one that guarantees the conclusion that Trump (our very honest Mr. Trump that to the inferior thinkers actually has integrity beyond the imagination of liberals) will lose.

If I take your meaning correctly through the fog of presumably-beer-generated mismatched parentheses, you appear to have jumped to the conclusion that I was forecasting the election outcome. Not a bit of it.

You make it sound (and I hear the sounds) as if all but hope is lost, but in absence of clear evidentiary evidence, do we not look (and pay attention to that which we look) (and properly consider and attempt to accurately weigh that to which we look) at, namely, indicators that more than merely suggest the direction we're taking? What I'm saying is that it's possible, but not just merely possible, that Trump stands more than a negligible chance of becoming the next president of the country between Canada and the future beautiful (oh so beautiful) wall.

Why do you have such great certainty and confidence that Trump's chances of winning the presidency is nil?

For them as are able to find anything to hope for in the indisputable uncertainties of voter behavior, by all means may they keep their hopes up to the bitter (and it will be bitter) end. I merely point out that yet-unknown running-mate choices, people whose dogs told them to assassinate presidential candidates, and the vagaries of meteorite trajectories, are sounder bases for hope in a nation that has already voted to put a sociopathic narcissist at the helm.

Liquor ))non-presumably((

- - - Updated - - -

Women.

What's wrong with the women in South Carolina?

[I can't believe I typed that].

Where thy loves go, I shall follow (probably to dig them out of trouble they make and find).

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

You make it sound (and I hear the sounds) as if all but hope is lost, but in absence of clear evidentiary evidence, do we not look (and pay attention to that which we look) (and properly consider and attempt to accurately weigh that to which we look) at, namely, indicators that more than merely suggest the direction we're taking? What I'm saying is that it's possible, but not just merely possible, that Trump stands more than a negligible chance of becoming the next president of the country between Canada and the future beautiful (oh so beautiful) wall.

Why do you have such great certainty and confidence that Trump's chances of winning the presidency is nil?

For them as are able to find anything to hope for in the indisputable uncertainties of voter behavior, by all means may they keep their hopes up to the bitter (and it will be bitter) end. I merely point out that yet-unknown running-mate choices, people whose dogs told them to assassinate presidential candidates, and the vagaries of meteorite trajectories, are sounder bases for hope in a nation that has already voted to put a sociopathic narcissist at the helm.

Moore-Coulter.