• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

Which movie did you watch today and how would you rate it?

An adventure in space and time 10/10

An excellent film about the creation of the Doctor Who television series. But more than that. The first doctor Who was an old man, William Hartnell. The film was about his struggles with old age and fearing death. Very well handled. Also it had the BBC first female producer and first Asian director. All with their own struggles. All in all, very well handled. It's also a period piece about the 60'ies. So that's fun. Acting and writing is top notch. Very well done.

I have no idea if it's any good if you don't like Doctor Who.
 
Hacksaw Ridge 8.5

Faith-and-flag war drama. Well acted. Intense...Did I say intense?
Amazing true story of Desmond Doss. Good cinematography.

 
Hacksaw Ridge 8.5

Faith-and-flag war drama. Well acted. Intense...Did I say intense?
Amazing true story of Desmond Doss. Good cinematography.
Just watched this last night. I liked that the story was split between his home life and army. Doss' character was excellent. I especially liked the initial boy meets girl scenes. Very well done. I could have lived with a little less faith, particularly when they were lowering him on the stretcher. They should have nixed that scene.
 
Hacksaw Ridge 8.5

Faith-and-flag war drama. Well acted. Intense...Did I say intense?
Amazing true story of Desmond Doss. Good cinematography.
Just watched this last night. I liked that the story was split between his home life and army. Doss' character was excellent. I especially liked the initial boy meets girl scenes. Very well done. I could have lived with a little less faith, particularly when they were lowering him on the stretcher. They should have nixed that scene.

Yeah, the faith bit called my attention, but then I thought it was his thing, you know, true to the character.
But what balls he had, of the finest titanium...Talking about heroism, this takes it.
And the girl is the beautiful Teresa Palmer

Teresa-Palmer-in-Hacksaw-Ridge.jpg
 
Lion - 7/10

The story can simultaneously be heartbreaking and uplifting at the same time. The acting, especially by the young actors, is exceptional. IMO the movie zipped along when during the main character's youth, but then sort of bogged down a bit. Nicole Kidman is good as the adoptive mother. I also liked how there was quite a bit of silence in the film - that characters did not talk without a purpose.
 
But what balls he had, of the finest titanium...Talking about heroism, this takes it.

I didn't think he did. There was some discussion when the movie came out about whether he was actually heroic or not.
 
But what balls he had, of the finest titanium...Talking about heroism, this takes it.

I didn't think he did. There was some discussion when the movie came out about whether he was actually heroic or not.
Hard to tell. He put his life on the line to rescue other soldiers. That is heroic. He refused to use any violent means while doing so. That is reckless as it puts the soldiers in need of rescuing at risk.

I'll conclude he was a reckless hero, like Captain Kirk.
 
I didn't think he did. There was some discussion when the movie came out about whether he was actually heroic or not.
Hard to tell. He put his life on the line to rescue other soldiers. That is heroic. He refused to use any violent means while doing so. That is reckless as it puts the soldiers in need of rescuing at risk.

I'll conclude he was a reckless hero, like Captain Kirk.

He's a total hero in my book. He was reckless with his own life and dedicated to the sole purpose of saving lives. I'm sure that if you were one of those 75 people he saved, you'd have been ecstatic to have him there to save you.
 
Hard to tell. He put his life on the line to rescue other soldiers. That is heroic. He refused to use any violent means while doing so. That is reckless as it puts the soldiers in need of rescuing at risk.

I'll conclude he was a reckless hero, like Captain Kirk.

He's a total hero in my book. He was reckless with his own life and dedicated to the sole purpose of saving lives. I'm sure that if you were one of those 75 people he saved, you'd have been ecstatic to have him there to save you.

Besides, recklessness has never disqualified someone from having a titanium pair.
 
I was reading about him after watching the movie. Some stuff he actually did had to be left out of the movie because 'no one would actually believe it'.

Specifically, he got hit by grenade shrapnel trying to protect others from it, then stayed up on the ridge for 5 more hours before coming back down. Once he was on the stretcher getting carried away, he rolled off and crawled to another wounded soldier to treat his wounds first, then insisted the stretcher bearers take the other guy first. That's when he got shot by a sniper, shattering his arm. He splinted his own arm with a rifle stock and then crawled 300 yards to an aid station. After the war, he lost a lung to TB, went deaf from antibiotic treatments, and still lived to be 87.

Also, apparently the number of people he saved was a compromise. According to the people at the bottom, he lowered more than 100 men but Doss insisted it couldn't have been more than 50, so they 'compromised' on 75.

Reckless? Sure. Religious? Definitely. Still, when it comes to being a good person and a badass, dude was way up there.
 
I was reading about him after watching the movie. Some stuff he actually did had to be left out of the movie because 'no one would actually believe it'.

Specifically, he got hit by grenade shrapnel trying to protect others from it, then stayed up on the ridge for 5 more hours before coming back down. Once he was on the stretcher getting carried away, he rolled off and crawled to another wounded soldier to treat his wounds first, then insisted the stretcher bearers take the other guy first. That's when he got shot by a sniper, shattering his arm. He splinted his own arm with a rifle stock and then crawled 300 yards to an aid station. After the war, he lost a lung to TB, went deaf from antibiotic treatments, and still lived to be 87.

He also remarried at 74 after his first wife died, so I guess being such an unrivalled badass also made him a pussy-magnet. :p
 
Holy Hell 6/10
Kumare 5/10

SPOILERS below.

Similar themes in both films. Holy Hell is a documentary about a small cult that began in the mid 80s in California called Buddhafield led by their conman guru Andreas aka Michel nee Jaime. It was one of those eastern religion/new age types of cults. This one had an amusing angle in that they looked more like an aerobics class than a religious group. Andreas's favorite attire was only a speedo and everyone else was fit or good looking and dressed similarly. They start out well and having lots of blissful times, but we soon enough find out that Andreas had been sexually abusing several male followers, even as he preached abstinence for everyone else. They also found he had a his history in gay porn (one reason he liked to change his name a lot). The film is made by a former member who happened to be the group's official videographer, which gave him access to lots of good footage for the documentary. He was one of the abused men. Interestingly, the former members have mostly good memories, they bought into the mysticism part of it, and its seemed that maybe if the abuse didn't come out they would still be there. They are largely still believers, just not in Andreas. He has started a new group in Hawaii if you're looking to be touched by a fully realized godman in a nice spot. The most coveted religious rite in the group was where Andreas would transfer his enlightenment to you by touching you in a very theatrical ritual. Members were jealous of those who got the special touch. It's an interesting story as far as these groups go, I rate it 6 as a film only because the directing is average and the focus a bit too self-indulgent.

http://afterthetruth.blogspot.com/
is an anonymous blog that was set up during the time when people started leaving the cult to commiserate and vent. One thing that I found and that was another weakness or at least regret of the film is that the members have lots of stories of Andreas being less than godly, but he would always put on his best face while the camera was on, so the footage is an incomplete picture, you had to rely on the testimony for the bad face. Andreas wasn't interviewed for the film, other than a poorly executed "ambush" of him in his new Hawaiian headquarters.

Kumare is another kind of "documentary" about guru cults. The director of this one wanted to expose how people fall for the fakery of gurus and so he posed as one himself and set himself up in Arizona around a yoga studio and drew a group of followers. He's Indian so he had the look after growing out his hair and beard and wearing a robe, and he knew how to talk in guru-speak, having grown up around it. The followers appeared to totally buy that he had super guru powers. A twist in this one is that his plan was to eventually do a reveal of the hoax, but he grew too attached to his flock himself and didn't want to hurt their feelings or something. So, he left town without the reveal, but kept in touch. Eventually he did a soft reveal where he showed up how he normally looks and where his tag line was the point was that they had the power in them all along, that it was them not him (like Oz). One woman left in a huff upon the reveal, others took it in stride and appreciated it, some still believed he had powers. I rated it a 5 because it seemed like the followers were paid or induced to show up, because they had too good of an attendance record at all his events. Too much a fake reality tv feel to it.
 
I didn't think he did. There was some discussion when the movie came out about whether he was actually heroic or not.
Hard to tell. He put his life on the line to rescue other soldiers. That is heroic. He refused to use any violent means while doing so. That is reckless as it puts the soldiers in need of rescuing at risk.

I'll conclude he was a reckless hero, like Captain Kirk.

The guys who were actually doing the shooting also risked their lives to save others AND end the war, and part of the people they saved by fighting included Doss and allowed him to keep his high moral ground while others did his dirty work for him.

I'm not really seeing any heroics from Doss compared to the guys who actually did the fighting.
 
Hard to tell. He put his life on the line to rescue other soldiers. That is heroic. He refused to use any violent means while doing so. That is reckless as it puts the soldiers in need of rescuing at risk.

I'll conclude he was a reckless hero, like Captain Kirk.

The guys who were actually doing the shooting also risked their lives to save others AND end the war, and part of the people they saved by fighting included Doss and allowed him to keep his high moral ground while others did his dirty work for him.

I'm not really seeing any heroics from Doss compared to the guys who actually did the fighting.

Nobody is saying that he was the only hero. Nobody is saying that others did not save lives. What we're saying is that he was the only one who stayed with the wounded at the ridge when everyone else left, and the only one who saved 75 injured men from certain death with total disregard for his own life, exemplifying the motto "no man left behind".

:shrug:
 
The Girl with All the Gifts 5/10

A zombie movie where the new take on it is that fetuses to infected pregnant women became semi-zombies. They have a bunch of zombie qualities while retaining some humanity. They also look fully human. This makes them a kind of super human of sorts. It's not a particularly interesting twist. It doesn't really go anywhere and besides the scene where Glenn Close describes the zombie baby eating itself out of the womb they don't really do much with it.

Acting is amazing. Filming is top notch. Zombies aren't interesting. The whole thing with that it's this time around a fungus who infects people. Who cares? Don't midiclorian my zombie movie. Just hand-wave please. A good example of the importance of having something to say. If you don't it doesn't matter how much talent you throw at it, it's not going to fly. This didn't.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt4547056/
 
The guys who were actually doing the shooting also risked their lives to save others AND end the war, and part of the people they saved by fighting included Doss and allowed him to keep his high moral ground while others did his dirty work for him.

I'm not really seeing any heroics from Doss compared to the guys who actually did the fighting.

Nobody is saying that he was the only hero. Nobody is saying that others did not save lives. What we're saying is that he was the only one who stayed with the wounded at the ridge when everyone else left, and the only one who saved 75 injured men from certain death with total disregard for his own life, exemplifying the motto "no man left behind".

:shrug:

Wasn't that his job? Caring for the wounded? The other soldiers have fighting to do. He expects brownie points for doing his job? :shrug:
 
Nobody is saying that he was the only hero. Nobody is saying that others did not save lives. What we're saying is that he was the only one who stayed with the wounded at the ridge when everyone else left, and the only one who saved 75 injured men from certain death with total disregard for his own life, exemplifying the motto "no man left behind".

:shrug:

Wasn't that his job? Caring for the wounded? The other soldiers have fighting to do. He expects brownie points for doing his job? :shrug:

:D

It's not that he did his job, it's that he did it so well! That's what they do in the Armed Forces, they give you a medal when you excel at your job!
So he excelled at his job and he got the Medal of Honor, but he wasn't the only one. Many others during WWII got medals too:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Medal_of_Honor_recipients_for_World_War_II
 
Wasn't that his job? Caring for the wounded? The other soldiers have fighting to do. He expects brownie points for doing his job? :shrug:

:D

It's not that he did his job, it's that he did it so well! That's what they do in the Armed Forces, they give you a medal when you excel at your job!
So he excelled at his job and he got the Medal of Honor, but he wasn't the only one. Many others during WWII got medals too:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Medal_of_Honor_recipients_for_World_War_II

So he's good at his job? Isn't he supposed to be? Who wants a lazy ass medic?
 
:D

It's not that he did his job, it's that he did it so well! That's what they do in the Armed Forces, they give you a medal when you excel at your job!
So he excelled at his job and he got the Medal of Honor, but he wasn't the only one. Many others during WWII got medals too:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Medal_of_Honor_recipients_for_World_War_II

So he's good at his job? Isn't he supposed to be? Who wants a lazy ass medic?

You are supposed to be good always. Then there is beyond good. Then there is AWESOME! In comes the Medal of Honor. They are giving their lives...Let them have a medal...
It's the least they should get, along with our undying gratitude...

Now, regarding the lazy ass medic, I agree...
 
Back
Top Bottom