Jimmy Higgins
Contributor
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2001
- Messages
- 50,514
- Basic Beliefs
- Calvinistic Atheist
He should have known better.When you insult someone, you don't get to decide how insulted they should be, or how they should react.
Even if they over-react, then an apology remains in order.
If your insult leads to action that genuinely imperils your career, then you really should have thought much harder before insulting someone. And if someone reports your insult to your boss/principal/supervisor/mother/whoever, and their report is an overreaction, then you can simply defend yourself with the facts - so your career isn't really in peril at all. If the facts are insufficient as a defence, then either your insult was worse than you are admitting; or you are better off getting out from under an unfair regime anyway.
Uh, he didn't think it was an insult at the time.
Exactly. Perspectives on issue are only based on skin color. You have clearly figured out the "PC Liberal theory".It was a mistake. He probably intended it to include her in on the conversation and obtain more diverse perspectives on the topic. Isn't one of the benefits according to PC liberal theory about diversity based on skin color and ethnicity that you get a greater variety of opinions and perspectives on things?
Exactly. Make certain you ask the blacks about how blacks feel about something. That is rule #3 in PC Liberal Theory as explained in PC Liberal Theory for Dummies by Penguin Publishing.It was probably having that drilled into his head by the diversity coordinator or the PC liberal culture that led to the innocent mistake.