Why Did Muhammad Use A Jewish God?

[Keith&Co.]

There are ideas based on what is known about the biology of life.

.

but they dont claimed to know nor does YOU know how does life began

And, what, argument from other guy's ignorance?

 

[DBT]

There are ideas based on what is known about the biology of life.

.

but they dont claimed to know nor does YOU know how does life began

That's what you should be doing, Syed, admitting that you don't know how life began. To say that we do not know precisely how life began is the right thing to do. To claim that you know how life began is the wrong thing to do. It's wrong because you have no evidence to support your own explanation of Special Creation by a Supernatural Entity.

 

[Syed]

but they dont claimed to know nor does YOU know how does life began

That's what you should be doing, Syed, admitting that you don't know how life began. To say that we do not know precisely how life began is the right thing to do. To claim that you know how life began is the wrong thing to do. It's wrong because you have no evidence to support your own explanation of Special Creation by a Supernatural Entity.

our rational is simple, a car can not come to existence without a creator and living creatures can not come to existence without a creator

what is your rational in disbelieve?

 

[Keith&Co.]

That's what you should be doing, Syed, admitting that you don't know how life began. To say that we do not know precisely how life began is the right thing to do. To claim that you know how life began is the wrong thing to do. It's wrong because you have no evidence to support your own explanation of Special Creation by a Supernatural Entity.

our rational is simple, a car can not come to existence without a creator and living creatures can not come to existence without a creator

what is your rational in disbelieve?

That every believer's argument is bullshit, like the one you offered...?
Your rationale assumes living creatures need an creator. Then you conclude that living creatures require a creator.
Concluding your premise is not the acme of rational thought, Syed.

 

[Syed]

our rational is simple, a car can not come to existence without a creator and living creatures can not come to existence without a creator

what is your rational in disbelieve?

That every believer's argument is bullshit, like the one you offered...?
Your rationale assumes living creatures need an creator. Then you conclude that living creatures require a creator.
Concluding your premise is not the acme of rational thought, Syed.

can you proof to me that living creatures does not need a creator?

 

[Keith&Co.]

That every believer's argument is bullshit, like the one you offered...?
Your rationale assumes living creatures need an creator. Then you conclude that living creatures require a creator.
Concluding your premise is not the acme of rational thought, Syed.

can you proof to me that living creatures does not need a creator?

You're the one claiming they do.
Do your own homework.
How did YOU come to believe that they do need a creator?


Now, MY claim is that believer claims are bullshit. My evidence includes and even highlights your post history to date.

You've been invited time after time after time to offer any sort of evidence that your beliefs are not presuppositionist claptrap, and you usually respond with either asking the other side a question, or claiming that 'it makes sense to me' is something like evidence.

 

[DBT]

That's what you should be doing, Syed, admitting that you don't know how life began. To say that we do not know precisely how life began is the right thing to do. To claim that you know how life began is the wrong thing to do. It's wrong because you have no evidence to support your own explanation of Special Creation by a Supernatural Entity.

our rational is simple, a car can not come to existence without a creator and living creatures can not come to existence without a creator

what is your rational in disbelieve?

The fallacy here is that you are equating an obviously manufactured item like a car, watch or whatever, to biological activity which is obviously not being manufactured. As the world has all the necessary elements to sustain life, logically, the world has all the necessary elements to form life in the first place.

This is a reasonable assumption. Far more reasonable than assuming an element, a Supernatural Entity, that you have no evidence for. You are using a completely unknown element (Supernatural) to explain something that most probably has a natural explanation, which we have yet to discover.

 

[Eldarion Lathria]

Who created the creator? And who created THAT creator and so on back?

Eldarion Lathria

 

[Syed]

Who created the creator? And who created THAT creator and so on back?

Eldarion Lathria

there are four thing in the universe are uncreated

god

space

elements/ matters

nature = chemical reaction or physic

 

[Syed]

our rational is simple, a car can not come to existence without a creator and living creatures can not come to existence without a creator

what is your rational in disbelieve?

The fallacy here is that you are equating an obviously manufactured item like a car, watch or whatever, to biological activity which is obviously not being manufactured. As the world has all the necessary elements to sustain life, logically, the world has all the necessary elements to form life in the first place.

.

if elements can create life itself then every dust of earth would had been living creature

 

[DBT]

The fallacy here is that you are equating an obviously manufactured item like a car, watch or whatever, to biological activity which is obviously not being manufactured. As the world has all the necessary elements to sustain life, logically, the world has all the necessary elements to form life in the first place.

.

if elements can create life itself then every dust of earth would had been living creature

The Earth is much more than just 'dust.'

 

[Syed]

if elements can create life itself then every dust of earth would had been living creature

The Earth is much more than just 'dust.'

my question was why didnt ALL elements of earth turn to living creatures?

 

[DBT]

The Earth is much more than just 'dust.'

my question was why didnt ALL elements of earth turn to living creatures?

'All elements' are not suitable for forming or sustaining life. If the conditions are not amenable to life, life cannot form nor can it be sustained.

 

[Syed]

my question was why didnt ALL elements of earth turn to living creatures?

'All elements' are not suitable for forming or sustaining life. If the conditions are not amenable to life, life cannot form nor can it be sustained.

ok

can chick born from broken egg?

 

[DBT]

'All elements' are not suitable for forming or sustaining life. If the conditions are not amenable to life, life cannot form nor can it be sustained.

ok

can chick born from broken egg?

Syed, you realize that your objections are getting ever more ridiculous?

 

[Keith&Co.]

The Earth is much more than just 'dust.'

my question was why didnt ALL elements of earth turn to living creatures?

You had no question.
You just asserted something that makes zero sense.










again.














And incidentally making my point that much stronger....

 

[Syed]

ok

can chick born from broken egg?

Syed, you realize that your objections are getting ever more ridiculous?

just answer the question please

 

[Keith&Co.]

Syed, you realize that your objections are getting ever more ridiculous?

just answer the question please

How about 'just answer the request for evidence?' That would be fair, right?
That we ask you to support your previous claims before we pay attention to the new ridiculous?

 

[Eldarion Lathria]

"god" Created by the human mind.

"space" Actually it's space-time. Space-time includes matter. Empty space is just the lack of matter

"elements/ matters" Elements are created in the interiors of stars. 'Matters' is a meaningless term in this case

"nature = chemical reaction or physic" Natural laws are different in each universe.

Mahoggian fails on all four. Which do you prefer syed, zerramak edo basurdeak? Or are you a txerrakume txortalari?

Eldarion Lathria

 

[Syed]

"god" Created by the human mind.

"space" Actually it's space-time. Space-time includes matter. Empty space is just the lack of matter

"elements/ matters" Elements are created in the interiors of stars. 'Matters' is a meaningless term in this case

"nature = chemical reaction or physic" Natural laws are different in each universe.

Mahoggian fails on all four. Which do you prefer syed, zerramak edo basurdeak? Or are you a txerrakume txortalari?



Eldarion Lathria

where does stars came from?