???
I read about a psychology experiment. The researchers got a lot of photos of women, and invited a lot of men to rate how pretty the women were. They threw out the pictures of women rated beautiful or ugly,
Aren't "
women rated beautiful" precisely what's called "
stereotypes". So men threw out the pictures of women with
stereotypical beauty even though according to rousseau those pictures signal "fertility". And yet you agree with what rousseau says?!
and kept the dozens who were rated average-looking. Then they used a computer morphing algorithm to average those photos, constructing a picture of a woman all of whose features were the exact mathematical average of the features of all those average looking women, and then they had the men rate the resulting hypothetical woman. She was gorgeous.
Yeah, that is good to me. Attractiveness based on averaging. Seems right.
---------------------------
Reproduction first means reproducing oneself. So, men going average is the population reproducing itself, aiming so to speak for the fat middle of the distribution. Reproduction is also, secondarily, as sexual reproduction, the means to test variability and maintain a varied genetic range. And then you'll always have more adventurous people to test outside of the fat middle, for whatever apparent reasons.
Still, it remains one question. If men respond to looks on the basis of an averaged look, why would that reflect good-health and fertility?
And still another question: Why is there so much hype about stereotypical beauty if most men are attracted in fact to the average girl?
EB