#YAKLA!!!!!

[laughing dog]

Since HRC was not in power when this mission happened and since Obama neither ordered nor okayed this mission, neither person is relevant to the OP.

 

[Elixir]

You were replying to me.

And you implicitly agreed. Fool.

 

[ZiprHead]

Again, it's not the attack, it's the misleading talking points about the reason for the attack (spontaneous attack due to a video vs. a pre-planned organized terrorist attack) and the glib response of "what difference does it make".

Abu Khatalla, called by US as leader of Benghazi attack, says it came out of a protest over the video.

He also maintained that the violence in Benghazi that night grew out of a protest against a movie produced in the United States that lampooned Islam and the Prophet Muhammad, rather than being a planned action by militants.

 

[blastula]

Yeah, it was always weird to me that the story was presented as a dichotomy between either a protest attack or a terrorist attack as though it couldn't be both.

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

Since HRC was not in power when this mission happened and since Obama neither ordered nor okayed this mission, neither person is relevant to the OP.

But... but... but... you need red herring!

 

[Elixir]

Since HRC was not in power when this mission happened and since Obama neither ordered nor okayed this mission, neither person is relevant to the OP.

But... but... but... you need red herring!

And a scapegoat.

 

[blastula]

This catastrophe in Yemen was something WE initiated.

For a legitimate purpose of combating AL Quida on the Arabian Peninsula. Note that this mission was first conceived while Obama was president. This operation was not something thought up and hastily executed by Trump.

Whether it was hasty is what's in question. Obama held off on it. Was Trump and/or the Pentagon too eager and discounted known pitfalls? There was also a report that they found out the attack was blown while en route.

And then in the aftermath, the White House story defending it has some holes.

 

[Elixir]

For a legitimate purpose of combating AL Quida on the Arabian Peninsula. Note that this mission was first conceived while Obama was president. This operation was not something thought up and hastily executed by Trump.

Whether it was hasty is what's in question. Obama held off on it. Was Trump and/or the Pentagon too eager and discounted known pitfalls? There was also a report that they found out the attack was blown while en route.

And then in the aftermath, the White House story defending it has some holes.

Including the laughable attempt by Cheato to shed blame on "the military" as if he isn't the guy at the top of "the military".
Some generals are saying Cheato was goaded into it by people telling him Obama was too timid to do it.