• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

Lies about Joe Biden

As a government employee through both regimes, it's been a relief to have someone relatively sane at the top, has a cascading effect of relative normalcy throughout the bureaucratic system. Things don't run great, but at least you have some idea of what to expect at the start of each day.
 
Apparently, it wasn't toilet paper stuck to the bottom of his shoe, either:

Is That Toilet Paper Stuck to President Trump’s Shoe?

I think Swammi needs to expand his news sources beyond just Colbert.

So according to a Trump hanger-on, it was just a small moist piece of paper.

Wow! That changes everything.
No it doesn't change anything. Its about as relevant a news bite as Biden eating ice cream.

I can relate to the toilet paper stuck to the shoe thing, though. I was eating at a nice, huge Mexican restaurant in Santa Fe once, and used the men's room located at the far end of the restaurant just before heading out the front door to leave. There was a lot of water and TP on the floor for some reason. A long piece of TP stuck to my shoe (at least a foot long) and I walked to the front trailing it behind me. Nobody on my way through said a thing, until I got to the front and the host said, "Sir, you're trailing something." I think he was being kind of a wise guy, but I appreciated him letting me know while I was leaving and with no else around (except my dining companion). Thinking back on it, I'm glad a fellow diner in the restaurant didn't point it out (if it was even noticed) while I was walking through. As someone with social anxiety back then, I would have been mortified being the center of attention like that in the middle of a crowd.
 
Now for the truth: Joe Biden bought ice cream. It's a scandal proving that he is unfit for being the President Of The United States. Yes. Really.



Geoblocked in some countries.

000_1JT17F.jpg


images

images

Castro-1.jpg

FZ1-vVURMeD_0MaeD2VK112cvb-YghOKE1AoYj-AcZk.jpg

donald-trump.jpg
 
The strong opposition to Trump, for many of us, had little to do with his specific policies.
Trump had policies? He had slogans, sure. And he mumbled nonsensical crap whenever a camera was in front him and certainly loved making fascistic decisions/executive orders but I can't think of any legislation he advocated or changes to government he implemented. Seriously, what policies did Trump actually accomplish?
The start of the end of globalism, neoliberalism, and liberal empiralism. No other conventional leader could have accomplished such a massive shift in US policy. These demographic cycle shifts that happen every 90 years or so anyway but they can not happen with "everyday run of the mill" leadership.
 
Lying works. More and more Republican voters think there is something wrong with the 2020 election than they did six months ago. The lying simply works.
Yes lying works. It is the main driver of propoganda and has been known about for many generations.. It worked during WW2 Germany and its functioning very well now with the monopolized main stream media of the US.
I thought that this comment was very interesting. Is it your view that all US media including CNN, MSNBC, Fox, Newsmax and etc are all lying and have been monopolized? Or is it your view that only the media left of fox news is lying and is monopolized? If the latter is true, where is the monopoly? BTW: in WW2 Germany, the Nazis took over all media. So, your comments above seem odd, unless I'm misunderstanding your point.
The problem is that the media is too concentrated among too few hands. That mostly happened during Clinton's regime.
 
I feel like they are shouting “fire!” In a crowded Democracy. They have calculated that they can cause chaos and death and destruction and they think they’ll get people out, be able to set a fire in the chaos without being seen as the arsonist, and end up owning an empty building lot in a prime piece of town. They don’t care about the deaths.


It is horrible.


And people like RVonse love it and cheer them on. Perhaps he thinks they will give him a corner condo. They will not.
Who is shouting fire? And who is the "they" you say I am cheering on and what the hell does a corner condo have to do with anything?

You have really lost me with this response. It makes about as much sense to me as the Trump ramblings in the OP's first post.
 
The start of the end of globalism, neoliberalism, and liberal empiralism.
Sure. Whatever the fuck that's supposed to mean.
Less globalism means the US bringing back to the US (mostly from China) high value manufacturing jobs, reducing income equality and strengthening the middle class. Less neoliberalism means less US involvement with military intervention throughout the world (also always at middle class expense), reducing CIA government overthrows for the purpose of helping overseas corporations. Less liberal imperialism means less US sanctions, monetary manipulations, and financial engineering on the rest of the world (also at middle class tax payer expense).

Basically the middle class was sick of all the aforementioned and spoke at the voting booths when they elected Trump.
 
The start of the end of globalism, neoliberalism, and liberal empiralism.
Sure. Whatever the fuck that's supposed to mean.
Less globalism means the US bringing back to the US (mostly from China) high value manufacturing jobs, reducing income equality and strengthening the middle class. Less neoliberalism means less US involvement with military intervention throughout the world (also always at middle class expense), reducing CIA government overthrows for the purpose of helping overseas corporations. Less liberal imperialism means less US sanctions, monetary manipulations, and financial engineering on the rest of the world (also at middle class tax payer expense).

Basically the middle class was sick of all the aforementioned and spoke at the voting booths when they elected Trump.

But Trump lost the popular election. His electoral victory was by razor thin margins in rust belt states with high electoral vote counts. It was really the conservative white blue collar vote that helped him squeak through. Biden won both the popular and electoral college vote decisively, and you don't mention what drove that victory. Perhaps the middle class was tired of gobbledygook, lies, lack of empathy, dictator-worship, and incompetence of the twice-impeached nut that Republicans somehow managed to squeak into the presidency in 2016 on an electoral fluke.
 
Less globalism means the US bringing back to the US (mostly from China) high value manufacturing jobs, reducing income equality and strengthening the middle class.
Didn't happen under Trump. Trump's trade war with China cost jobs and hurt the middle class. Also not a policy, just a dick wave.
Less neoliberalism means less US involvement with military intervention throughout the world (also always at middle class expense), reducing CIA government overthrows for the purpose of helping overseas corporations
Also didn't happen under Trump. Ask Soleimani or anyone currently living in Yemen. He did block military pay raises though but insisted on pork barrel spending on projects like the F-35 and "The super duper missile". So yeah. Trump did keep that nice military industrial complex chugging along. That you fell for his bullshit doesn't change that.
A piece of advice RVonse; what people do is more important than what they say.
Basically the middle class was sick of all the aforementioned and spoke at the voting booths when they elected Trump.
Doesn't change the fact Trump did fuck all to address these grievances or have any particular policy. Case in point everything you described Trump as doing was nothing more than rhetorical horseshit.
 
The start of the end of globalism, neoliberalism, and liberal empiralism.
Sure. Whatever the fuck that's supposed to mean.
Less globalism means the US bringing back to the US (mostly from China) high value manufacturing jobs, reducing income equality and strengthening the middle class. Less neoliberalism means less US involvement with military intervention throughout the world (also always at middle class expense), reducing CIA government overthrows for the purpose of helping overseas corporations. Less liberal imperialism means less US sanctions, monetary manipulations, and financial engineering on the rest of the world (also at middle class tax payer expense).

Basically the middle class was sick of all the aforementioned and spoke at the voting booths when they elected Trump.
High value manufacturing jobs?!

What went to China is low value jobs! The high value stuff is still here, or else is being done by robots. The robots have taken far more jobs than China.
 
Yes lying works. It is the main driver of propoganda and has been known about for many generations.. It worked during WW2 Germany and its functioning very well now with the monopolized main stream media of the US.
I thought that this comment was very interesting. Is it your view that all US media including CNN, MSNBC, Fox, Newsmax and etc are all lying and have been monopolized? Or is it your view that only the media left of fox news is lying and is monopolized? If the latter is true, where is the monopoly? BTW: in WW2 Germany, the Nazis took over all media. So, your comments above seem odd, unless I'm misunderstanding your point.
The problem is that the media is too concentrated among too few hands. That mostly happened during Clinton's regime.
Oh my; a random jibe against Joe Biden, hunh? If you're aware enough to think you know the chronology, why aren't you aware of the actual partisan alignments? :confused2:

Many of the important changes have been made by FCC decisions, usually decided by 3-2 vote. As just one example, "The U.S. Federal Communications Commission voted 3-2 on Tuesday [2020] to maintain its 2017 repeal of Obama-era net neutrality rules," My Google-fu isn't good enough to confirm that all these rulings had 3 R-appointees voting for Big Media, and 2 D-appointees voting No. Any bets?
 
The start of the end of globalism, neoliberalism, and liberal empiralism.
Sure. Whatever the fuck that's supposed to mean.
Less globalism means the US bringing back to the US (mostly from China) high value manufacturing jobs, reducing income equality and strengthening the middle class. Less neoliberalism means less US involvement with military intervention throughout the world (also always at middle class expense), reducing CIA government overthrows for the purpose of helping overseas corporations. Less liberal imperialism means less US sanctions, monetary manipulations, and financial engineering on the rest of the world (also at middle class tax payer expense).

Basically the middle class was sick of all the aforementioned and spoke at the voting booths when they elected Trump.
High value manufacturing jobs?!

What went to China is low value jobs! The high value stuff is still here, or else is being done by robots. The robots have taken far more jobs than China.
All manufacturing jobs are high value added. Simply because manufacturers take a low value raw material and adds the high value (profit) of production to make something useful. With high value added manufacturing it is at least economically possible to pay high wages. And in Germany where labor unions still have power, high wages are paid for this labor.

And the robots have not taken more jobs than China. It is the Triffin Delemma coupled with good old fashioned political corruption that has taken more jobs to China. The reserve currency paradox has all but killed exports out of the US.

 
Apparently, it wasn't toilet paper stuck to the bottom of his shoe, either:

I think Swammi needs to expand his news sources beyond just Colbert.

So according to a Trump hanger-on, it was just a small moist piece of paper.

Wow! That changes everything.
No it doesn't change anything. Its about as relevant a news bite as Biden eating ice cream.
:confused2: The Swammi excerpt above was obviously sarcastic.

I'm trying to figure out which of your two posts were sarcastic, because if BOTH were sincere you're showing a giant cognition failure.

The correction from "toilet paper" to "small moist piece of paper" was so urgent that I needed to watch whoever (InfoWars?) instead of CBS. Yet it was all "about as relevant a news bite as Biden eating ice cream." (To take this at face value, I need to watch the Alex Jones segment on Biden's ice cream as well! :) )

:confused2: Were BOTH of your posts sarcastic? Perhaps you should prefix paragraphs with "[serious]" when they're intended as substantive.
 
Back
Top Bottom