• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

The Right's War On Teachers

. . . In Oregon, the Oregon Health Authority delayed a meeting already scheduled between multiple parties because not delaying it plays into the hands of white supremacy:

In an email obtained by Reason, Regional Health Equity Coalition Program Manager Danielle Droppers informed the community that a scheduled conversation between OHA officials and relevant members of the public would not take place as planned.

"Thank you for your interest in attending the community conversation between Regional Health Equity Coalitions (RHECs) and Community Advisory Councils (CACs) to discuss the Community Investment Collaboratives (CICs). [In being responsive to partners from across the state, we're hearing the timing of this meeting is not ideal and that people would like more time to prepare for this important conversation]. wrote Droppers. "We recognize that urgency is a white supremacy value that can get in the way of more intentional and thoughtful work, and we want to attend to this dynamic. Therefore, we will reach out at a later date to reschedule."

It will come as no surprise to those familiar with lying by FoxNews, Trumpists, and others pimping for the GOP-Kremlin axis, that a key sentence was omitted from the above quote. I've taken the liberty of adding it, red and in brackets, to the above quote.

If anybody thinks that the quote from "Reason" was NOT a lie — they didn't CHANGE words, they just omitted the key sentence — please raise your hand.

"In being responsive to partners from across the state, we're hearing the timing of this meeting is not ideal and that people would like more time to prepare for this important conversation."

I would not have bothered with the click (to "Reason" har-de-har-har!) , but I was pretty sure there was an omission or other lie. What do I win?
Except even with that sentence added in context, it doesn't make the "supremecy" statement any less nonsensical and ridiculous. I mean how in the heck is "urgency" a white supremecy thing to begin with? I'd also say a letter isn't exactly the basis for presuming the beliefs across a movement either.

I think statements like that are the result of liberal arts graduates trying to think too hard.
 
. . . In Oregon, the Oregon Health Authority delayed a meeting already scheduled between multiple parties because not delaying it plays into the hands of white supremacy:

In an email obtained by Reason, Regional Health Equity Coalition Program Manager Danielle Droppers informed the community that a scheduled conversation between OHA officials and relevant members of the public would not take place as planned.

"Thank you for your interest in attending the community conversation between Regional Health Equity Coalitions (RHECs) and Community Advisory Councils (CACs) to discuss the Community Investment Collaboratives (CICs). [In being responsive to partners from across the state, we're hearing the timing of this meeting is not ideal and that people would like more time to prepare for this important conversation]. wrote Droppers. "We recognize that urgency is a white supremacy value that can get in the way of more intentional and thoughtful work, and we want to attend to this dynamic. Therefore, we will reach out at a later date to reschedule."

It will come as no surprise to those familiar with lying by FoxNews, Trumpists, and others pimping for the GOP-Kremlin axis, that a key sentence was omitted from the above quote. I've taken the liberty of adding it, red and in brackets, to the above quote.

If anybody thinks that the quote from "Reason" was NOT a lie — they didn't CHANGE words, they just omitted the key sentence — please raise your hand.

"In being responsive to partners from across the state, we're hearing the timing of this meeting is not ideal and that people would like more time to prepare for this important conversation."

I would not have bothered with the click (to "Reason" har-de-har-har!) , but I was pretty sure there was an omission or other lie. What do I win?
Except even with that sentence added in context, it doesn't make the "supremecy" statement any less nonsensical and ridiculous. I mean how in the heck is "urgency" a white supremecy thing to begin with? I'd also say a letter isn't exactly the basis for presuming the beliefs across a movement either.

I think statements like that are the result of liberal arts graduates trying to think too hard.
In some respects, white supremacy functions smoothly because of the value-messaging around urgency: It's urgent to do this thing you are being prompted unto, don't think too much about it because it's urgent.

This ridiculous commitment to thoughtless "urgent" response very much is a "white people" thing and it's not really a coincidence.

Really we should be resisting such calls to urgency, giving thought, and then going ahead on that basis or at least affording thought at the first possible opportunity. If none presents itself, it is better to risk death and failure and make an opportunity than continue forever without the proper application of doubt.

This goes against the dictates of white culture, however. We would be much better off looking at such a "virtue" with dubiousness.
 
First rule in being alt-right: avoid serious critiques of the outrageous claims your community makes. Instead focus on silly crap like a tongue in cheek comment some organization included in a letter, or allegations of sexual misconduct by a video game reviewer.
 
If you'd like, you can demonstrate how this "urgent" thing is a racial / cultural aspect. I read it as lib art grads with too much time on their hands.
 
If you'd like, you can demonstrate how this "urgent" thing is a racial / cultural aspect. I read it as lib art grads with too much time on their hands.
Consider the phrase, as encouraged by "protestants", primarily WASPS, to have a "Protestant work ethic".

This comes in with such white culturalisms as "timeliness is godliness" and criticisms around tardiness echoing primarily in white communities.

See also the white rabbit and how he was always late... This isn't anywhere near as prevalent in nonwhite communities.

Maybe some Asian communities have a thing for punctuality as well? I'm not sure. Primarily it hails from European sources.

It's been co-opted in various ways to supremacy concerns
 
Who the hell cares? If you want to know what the Oregon OEI actually believes and acts on, there's no need to infer it from random e-mails; they've published loads of official policy documents and other texts. But we're not going to lure a WN sympathizer into a conversation about a serious policy position, are we? Much more important to take any and all conversations down some stupid rabbit hole having little to do with the discussion.

"Why are conservatives and their quasi-fascist allies trying to destroy public education, even though that would obviously hurt all Americans including themselves?"

"Look, an EMAIL! Let's obsess over an EMAIL!!!!"

nine eleven.jpg
 
If you'd like, you can demonstrate how this "urgent" thing is a racial / cultural aspect. I read it as lib art grads with too much time on their hands.
Consider the phrase, as encouraged by "protestants", primarily WASPS, to have a "Protestant work ethic".
This comes in with such white culturalisms as "timeliness is godliness" and criticisms around tardiness echoing primarily in white communities.
And musicians!
See also the white rabbit and how he was always late... This isn't anywhere near as prevalent in nonwhite communities.

Maybe some Asian communities have a thing for punctuality as well? I'm not sure. Primarily it hails from European sources.

It's been co-opted in various ways to supremacy concerns
Oi! This is reading way too deeply into something. Also, I'd question the use of urgency verses immediacy! Urgency implies a matter of importance that needs immediate attention. Immediacy merely means something getting attention quickly.

I read all of this and just see it as people skull fucking language. Being on time is a thing that isn't wrong or a sign of white supremacy. Wanna talk dress code, okay... but being somewhere at some time that was predetermined... that is called being polite.
 
During my travels in the 20th century, Americans were noted for hard-working, no-nonsense, don't-procrastinate attitudes. I met people who had immigrated to USA, then returned, not liking the hard-driving ethic.

Different ethnic groups have different cultures, but a national stereotype generally applies, by default, to the dominant culture or group.
I will just note that the workaholic attitude is NOT present among some Native American groups.

If you'd like, you can demonstrate how this "urgent" thing is a racial / cultural aspect. I read it as lib art grads with too much time on their hands.
Consider the phrase, as encouraged by "protestants", primarily WASPS, to have a "Protestant work ethic".

This comes in with such white culturalisms as "timeliness is godliness" and criticisms around tardiness echoing primarily in white communities.

See also the white rabbit and how he was always late... This isn't anywhere near as prevalent in nonwhite communities.

Maybe some Asian communities have a thing for punctuality as well? I'm not sure. Primarily it hails from European sources.

It's been co-opted in various ways to supremacy concerns

I think Jarhyn has it right. Insistence on eradicating ethnic or racial stereotypes, even when they have statistical validity, can become wokeism-run-amok.

BOTH sides of the political divide will argue BOTH sides of the stereotyping issue, according as it suits an agenda.
 
And such a handle on the human psyche as "polity" over dancing to an enforced schedule, upon which there will be reprisals for failure and judgement to the extent it is failed particularly in a world where this is not a universal value across cultural lines of racially isolated communities equates into a tool for racial sorting under the guise of "polity" sorting.
 
During my travels in the 20th century, Americans were noted for hard-working, no-nonsense, don't-procrastinate attitudes. I met people who had immigrated to USA, then returned, not liking the hard-driving ethic.

Different ethnic groups have different cultures, but a national stereotype generally applies, by default, to the dominant culture.
Funny, as I view the poor Hispanics to be the hardest workers in the US.
If you'd like, you can demonstrate how this "urgent" thing is a racial / cultural aspect. I read it as lib art grads with too much time on their hands.
Consider the phrase, as encouraged by "protestants", primarily WASPS, to have a "Protestant work ethic".

This comes in with such white culturalisms as "timeliness is godliness" and criticisms around tardiness echoing primarily in white communities.

See also the white rabbit and how he was always late... This isn't anywhere near as prevalent in nonwhite communities.

Maybe some Asian communities have a thing for punctuality as well? I'm not sure. Primarily it hails from European sources.

It's been co-opted in various ways to supremacy concerns
I think Jarhyn has it right. Insistence on eradicating ethnic or racial stereotypes, even when they have statistical validity, can become wokeism-run-amok.

BOTH sides of the political divide will argue BOTH sides of the stereotyping issue, according as it suits an agenda.
I'm arguing both sides can be wrong... and even in this case, it one instance from one side.
 
This goes back aways, 2012.

Texas GOP rejects ‘critical thinking’ skills. Really.

In the you-can’t-make-up-this-stuff department, here’s what the Republican Party of Texas wrote into its 2012 platform as part of the section on education:



Knowledge-Based Education – We oppose the teaching of Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) (values clarification), critical thinking skills and similar programs that are simply a relabeling of Outcome-Based Education (OBE) (mastery learning) which focus on behavior modification and have the purpose of challenging the student’s fixed beliefs and undermining parental authority.



Yes, you read that right. The party opposes the teaching of “higher order thinking skills” because it believes the purpose is to challenge a student’s “fixed beliefs” and undermine “parental authority.”
 
This goes back aways, 2012.

Texas GOP rejects ‘critical thinking’ skills. Really.

In the you-can’t-make-up-this-stuff department, here’s what the Republican Party of Texas wrote into its 2012 platform as part of the section on education:



Knowledge-Based Education – We oppose the teaching of Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) (values clarification), critical thinking skills and similar programs that are simply a relabeling of Outcome-Based Education (OBE) (mastery learning) which focus on behavior modification and have the purpose of challenging the student’s fixed beliefs and undermining parental authority.



Yes, you read that right. The party opposes the teaching of “higher order thinking skills” because it believes the purpose is to challenge a student’s “fixed beliefs” and undermine “parental authority.”
Point of order. Rejecting Higher Order Thinking Skills as a particular pedagogical buzz phrase is not necessarily the same thing as rejecting higher order thinking skills in general. To make an analogy, I opposed the Bush-Era Healthy Forests Initiative with vigor, but I like healthy forests as a general concept. And as regards HOTS, I myself can confess to a rather ambivalent feeling about Bloom's taxonomy (the theoretical paradigm on which such pedagogies are based) and its supposed connection to measurable student learning outcomes.


I do think educators have a responsibility to undermine parental authority and fixed belief, though. Otherwise, why send kids to schools at all? They don't need to leave the ranch to encounter their parents' ideas and knowledge. You go to school to learn what your parents don't know, and encounter ideas and perspectives that you could never have been exposed to othweriwse, the better to prepare you for an adult life and career in a wider world where not everyone understands things in the same peculiar way that your immediate family does.
 
Last edited:
This goes back aways, 2012.

Texas GOP rejects ‘critical thinking’ skills. Really.

In the you-can’t-make-up-this-stuff department, here’s what the Republican Party of Texas wrote into its 2012 platform as part of the section on education:



Knowledge-Based Education – We oppose the teaching of Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) (values clarification), critical thinking skills and similar programs that are simply a relabeling of Outcome-Based Education (OBE) (mastery learning) which focus on behavior modification and have the purpose of challenging the student’s fixed beliefs and undermining parental authority.



Yes, you read that right. The party opposes the teaching of “higher order thinking skills” because it believes the purpose is to challenge a student’s “fixed beliefs” and undermine “parental authority.”

Looking at the Internet Archives, here is that 2012 platform and some other interesting things:
American Identity Patriotism and Loyalty – We believe the current teaching of a multicultural curriculum is divisive. We favor strengthening our common American identity and loyalty instead of political correctness that nurtures alienation among racial and ethnic groups. Students should pledge allegiance to the American and Texas flags daily to instill patriotism.
Basic Standards – We favor improving the quality of education for all students, including those with special needs. We support a return to the traditional basics of reading, writing, arithmetic, and citizenship with sufficient discipline to ensure learning and quality educational assessment.
Bilingual Education – We encourage non-English speaking students to transition to English within three years.
Career and Technology Education (Vocational Education) – We support reinstatement of voluntary career and technology education, including adjusting the 4x4 requirements as needed, without detracting from nonvocational program requirements.
Classroom Discipline –We recommend that local school boards and classroom teachers be given more authority to deal with disciplinary problems. Corporal punishment is effective and legal in Texas.
Classroom Expenditures for Staff – We support having 80% of school district payroll expenses of professional staff of a school district be full-time classroom teachers.
College Tuition – We recommend three levels of college tuition: In-state requiring proof of Texas legal citizenship, out-of-state requiring proof of US citizenship, and nonresident legal alien. Non-US citizens should not be eligible for state or federal grants, or loans.
Controversial Theories – We support objective teaching and equal treatment of all sides of scientific theories. We believe theories such as life origins and environmental change should be taught as challengeable scientific theories subject to change as new data is produced. Teachers and students should be able to discuss the strengths and weaknesses of these theories openly and without fear of retribution or discrimination of any kind.
Early Childhood Development – We believe that parents are best suited to train their children in their early development and oppose mandatory pre-school and Kindergarten. We urge Congress to repeal government sponsored programs that deal with early childhood development.
Knowledge-Based Education – We oppose the teaching of Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) (values clarification), critical thinking skills and similar programs that are simply a relabeling of Outcome-Based Education (OBE) (mastery learning) which focus on behavior modification and have the purpose of challenging the student’s fixed beliefs and undermining parental authority.
Educational Entitlement – We encourage legislation that prohibits enrollment in free public schools of noncitizens unlawfully present in the United States.
Funding of Education – We urge the Legislature to direct expenditures to academics as the first priority.
Higher Education – We support merit-based admissions for all college and university applicants to public institutions. We further support the repeal of the 1997 Texas legislative act commonly known as the Top Ten Percent Rule. All Texas students should be given acceptance priority over out-of-state or foreign students.
Juvenile Daytime Curfew - We strongly oppose Juvenile Daytime Curfews. Additionally, we oppose any official entity from detaining, questioning and/or disciplining our children without the consent of a child’s parent.
Local Control for Education – We support school choice and believe that quality education is best achieved by encouraging parental involvement, protecting parental rights, and maximizing local independent school district control. District superintendents and their employees should be made solely accountable to their locally elected boards. We support sensible consolidation of local school districts. We encourage local ISDs to consider carefully the advantages and disadvantages of accepting federal education money.
No Taxpayer Paid Lobbyists – We support the prohibition of any paid public school employee or contractor to lobby the legislature or the SBOE, unless on an unpaid basis and in an unofficial capacity. No registered lobbyist should be allowed to run for SBOE. 13
Parental Rights in Education – We believe the right of parents to raise and educate their children is fundamental. Parents have the right to withdraw their child from any specialized program. We urge the Legislature to enact penalties for violation of parental rights.
Sex Education – We recognize parental responsibility and authority regarding sex education. We believe that parents must be given an opportunity to review the material prior to giving their consent. We oppose any sex education other than abstinence until marriage.
Parental School Choice – We encourage the Governor and the Texas Legislature to enact child-centered school funding options which fund the student, not schools or districts, to allow maximum freedom of choice in public, private, or parochial education for all children.
Permanent School Fund – We believe that because the Permanent School Fund is not paid by taxpayers that the principle balance should be safeguarded and not viewed as a source of additional funding for our state budget. Political Community Organizing in Texas Schools - We believe neither Texas public schools should be used nor their students should be instructed by groups such as SEIU or other community organizers as instruments to promote political agenda during the instructional school day.
Private Education – We believe that parents and legal guardians may choose to educate their children in private schools to include, but not limited to, home schools and parochial schools without government interference, through definition, regulation, accreditation, licensing, or testing.
Religious Freedom in Public Schools – We urge school administrators and officials to inform Texas school students specifically of their First Amendment rights to pray and engage in religious speech, individually or in groups, on school property without government interference. We urge the Legislature to end censorship of discussion of religion in our founding documents and encourage discussing those documents.
School Surveys and Testing – Public schools should be required to obtain written parental consent for student participation in any test or questionnaire that surveys beliefs, feelings, or opinions. Parental rights, including viewing course materials prior to giving consent, should not be infringed.
State Board of Education (SBOE) – We believe that the SBOE should continue to be an elected body consisting of fifteen members. Their responsibilities must include:  Appointing the Commissioner of Education  Maintaining constitutional authority over the Permanent School Fund  Maintaining sole authority over all curricula content and the state adoption of all educational materials. This process must include public hearings. The SBOE should be minimally staffed out of general revenue.
Textbook Review – Until such time as all texts are required to be approved by the SBOE, each ISD that uses non-SBOE approved instructional materials must verify them as factually and historically correct. Also the ISD board must hold a public hearing on such materials, protect citizen’s right of petition and require compliance with TEC and legislative intent. Local ISD boards must maintain the same standards as the SBOE.
Supporting Military Families in Education – Existing truancy laws conflict with troop deployments. We believe that truancy laws should be amended to allow 5 day absence prior to deployments and R&R. Military dependents by definition will be Texas residents for education purposes.
Traditional Principles in Education – We support school subjects with emphasis on the Judeo-Christian principles upon which America was founded and which form the basis of America’s legal, political and economic systems. We support curricula that are heavily weighted on original founding documents, including the Declaration of Independence, the US Constitution, and Founders’ writings.
School Health Care – We urge legislators to prohibit reproductive health care services, including counseling, referrals, and distribution of condoms and contraception through public schools. We support the parents’ right to choose, without penalty, which medications are administered to their minor children. We oppose medical clinics on school property except higher education and health care for students without parental consent. 14
U.S. Department of Education – Since education is not an enumerated power of the federal government, we believe the Department of Education (DOE) should be abolished.
Zero Tolerance – We believe that zero tolerance policies in schools should specify those items that will not be tolerated at schools. The policy should be posted on ISD websites.
Transparency – We support legislation requiring all school districts to post their expenditures online or made readily available to the public.
Foreign Culture Charter Schools in Texas – We oppose public funding of charter schools which receive money from foreign entities. We demand that these Charter Schools have accountability and transparency to local parents, taxpayers, the State of Texas, as do current public schools, including U.S. citizenship of public school trustees.
 
...You go to school to learn what your parents don't know, and encounter ideas and perspectives that you could never have been exposed to othweriwse, ...

Education ought to allow children to grow to their potential which could mean, they outgrow their parents' knowledge and critical thinking skills, but then that risks challenging conservative authority. I guess that's why conservatives have to go to war against "Marxist teachers" to "liberate children."
 
...You go to school to learn what your parents don't know, and encounter ideas and perspectives that you could never have been exposed to othweriwse, ...

Education ought to allow children to grow to their potential which could mean, they outgrow their parents' knowledge and critical thinking skills, but then that risks challenging conservative authority. I guess that's why conservatives have to go to war against "Marxist teachers" to "liberate children."
This idea interleaves with the idea that these conservative parents are seeking to essentially clone everything about them into their kids, to "reincarnate" after a fashion in them whether or not those kids even consent to that, and a large aspect of this bizarre pseudo-spiritual materialistic reincarnation is rigid control, and repetition of their own upbringing until such a point as it actually sinks in.

This requires revocation of all aspects of life and learning which might call into question whether to remain open to this in-pouring of indoctrination.

And thus, "anti-intellectualism". Never mind that it's exactly the inverse of what the originator of such thoughts within their tradition would have seen be done with this mechanism.
 
...You go to school to learn what your parents don't know, and encounter ideas and perspectives that you could never have been exposed to othweriwse, ...

Education ought to allow children to grow to their potential which could mean, they outgrow their parents' knowledge and critical thinking skills, but then that risks challenging conservative authority. I guess that's why conservatives have to go to war against "Marxist teachers" to "liberate children."
This idea interleaves with the idea that these conservative parents are seeking to essentially clone everything about them into their kids, to "reincarnate" after a fashion in them whether or not those kids even consent to that, and a large aspect of this bizarre pseudo-spiritual materialistic reincarnation is rigid control, and repetition of their own upbringing until such a point as it actually sinks in.

This requires revocation of all aspects of life and learning which might call into question whether to remain open to this in-pouring of indoctrination.

And thus, "anti-intellectualism". Never mind that it's exactly the inverse of what the originator of such thoughts within their tradition would have seen be done with this mechanism.
Often based on their extremely fuzzy and inaccurate memories of what public education was like around, say, 1950-1975...
 
I remember when we fired this white dude. The biggest problem is he liked to work with his underwear hanging out. Sometimes he'd wear these bright green undies that you just couldn't miss. Maybe if he'd made us more money we would have retained him and even bought him some different colored undies that weren't so flashy.
 
. . . In Oregon, the Oregon Health Authority delayed a meeting already scheduled between multiple parties because not delaying it plays into the hands of white supremacy:

In an email obtained by Reason, Regional Health Equity Coalition Program Manager Danielle Droppers informed the community that a scheduled conversation between OHA officials and relevant members of the public would not take place as planned.

"Thank you for your interest in attending the community conversation between Regional Health Equity Coalitions (RHECs) and Community Advisory Councils (CACs) to discuss the Community Investment Collaboratives (CICs). [In being responsive to partners from across the state, we're hearing the timing of this meeting is not ideal and that people would like more time to prepare for this important conversation]. wrote Droppers. "We recognize that urgency is a white supremacy value that can get in the way of more intentional and thoughtful work, and we want to attend to this dynamic. Therefore, we will reach out at a later date to reschedule."

It will come as no surprise to those familiar with lying by FoxNews, Trumpists, and others pimping for the GOP-Kremlin axis, that a key sentence was omitted from the above quote. I've taken the liberty of adding it, red and in brackets, to the above quote.

If anybody thinks that the quote from "Reason" was NOT a lie — they didn't CHANGE words, they just omitted the key sentence — please raise your hand.

"In being responsive to partners from across the state, we're hearing the timing of this meeting is not ideal and that people would like more time to prepare for this important conversation."

I would not have bothered with the click (to "Reason" har-de-har-har!) , but I was pretty sure there was an omission or other lie. What do I win?
Except even with that sentence added in context, it doesn't make the "supremecy" statement any less nonsensical and ridiculous. I mean how in the heck is "urgency" a white supremecy thing to begin with? I'd also say a letter isn't exactly the basis for presuming the beliefs across a movement either.

I think statements like that are the result of liberal arts graduates trying to think too hard.
It's true that it makes the sentence worse and not better.

My initial thought was that Droppers simply hadn't prepared herself on time for the meetings and threw out a 'reason' that she thought nobody would dare argue with. But given the participants themselves had asked for more time, according to her own email, that is all the 'excuse' she needed, presumably. But, let's be sure to imply white people have something wrong with them anyway, for funsies!
 
I would not have bothered with the click (to "Reason" har-de-har-har!) , but I was pretty sure there was an omission or other lie. What do I win?

Screen-Shot-2022-07-02-at-4.15.51-PM-1024x617.png

Nothing? The redacted image above already appears in the Reason article. The full context was already there.
 
Back
Top Bottom