A day without stupid?

[ZiprHead]

Fuck you.

 

[Patooka]

Fuck you.

I don't think you lot are ever going to get serious about guns until some one makes the argument that convicted rapists and murderers should be allowed to own guns because "muh sekond armendmunt!" in court.

 

[ZiprHead]

Elise Stefanik is touting $12.9 million to support rural hospitals in her district. The source of that funding? Biden's $1.9 trillion Covid aid package — which she voted against last year.

News and analysis from Capitol Hill for when you only have a few minutes, from POLITICO.

www.politico.com

Elise Stefanik is touting $12.9 million to support rural hospitals in her district. The source of that funding? Biden's $1.9 trillion Covid aid package — which she voted against last year.​

Other Republicans have also applauded funding from a bill they voted against.

 

[ZiprHead]

Trump threatens defamation suits against members of Pulitzer Prize Board for defending Russiagate honors

Former President Trump told the Pulitzer Prize Board that individual members could face defamation suits over their defense of 2018 National Reporting prizes.

www.foxnews.com

Snowflake.

 

[Jarhyn]

Trump threatens defamation suits against members of Pulitzer Prize Board for defending Russiagate honors

Former President Trump told the Pulitzer Prize Board that individual members could face defamation suits over their defense of 2018 National Reporting prizes.

www.foxnews.com

Snowflake.

Of course the brief article from Faux News is very careful not to make any observations that would imply that Trump really is as full of shit as his pants.

 

[Loren Pechtel]

Of course the brief article from Faux News is very careful not to make any observations that would imply that Trump really is as full of shit as his pants.

Does he even have pants?

 

[Jarhyn]

Of course the brief article from Faux News is very careful not to make any observations that would imply that Trump really is as full of shit as his pants.

Does he even have pants?

Yes, they are noisy, absorbent, and plastic lined.

 

[Loren Pechtel]

Of course the brief article from Faux News is very careful not to make any observations that would imply that Trump really is as full of shit as his pants.

Does he even have pants?

Yes, they are noisy, absorbent, and plastic lined.

I was thinking of the Emperor.

 

[Jarhyn]

Of course the brief article from Faux News is very careful not to make any observations that would imply that Trump really is as full of shit as his pants.

Does he even have pants?

Yes, they are noisy, absorbent, and plastic lined.

I was thinking of the Emperor.

I think "the 'emperor' needs a change" is more disappointing than "the emperor has no clothes".

 

[Worldtraveller]

Of course the brief article from Faux News is very careful not to make any observations that would imply that Trump really is as full of shit as his pants.

Does he even have pants?

Depends....

 

[ZiprHead]

 

[Jarhyn]

In what world could that possibly be anything but a mass-murder weapon?

I really find myself wishing to see it used on everyone who participated in designing it.

I'll file that with "unproductive desires that best belong in the circular file", but there it is.

 

[Shadowy Man]

In what world could that possibly be anything but a mass-murder weapon?

I really find myself wishing to see it used on everyone who participated in designing it.

I'll file that with "unproductive desires that best belong in the circular file", but there it is.

Apparently deer have evolved to recognize AR-15s so this type of weapon has become necessary for hunters.

 

[Loren Pechtel]

That's clearly covered by the NFA. Lots and lots of paperwork to own it legally and the local authorities get a veto.

 

[ZiprHead]

Seen elsewhere:

Stop the presses! It's Tan Suit 2.0! Worse than Dijon Mustardgate!

Quote:
Jesse Watters on Monday harped on President Joe Biden’s choice to eat an ice cream cone at a Baskin Robbins in Portland, Oregon over the weekend, complaining that his methods of doing so were “too casual a look for the country.”

Quote:
The Fox host also made a bizarre list and do’s and don’ts for ice cream eating — his commentary resembling the hubbub largely in right-wing media after then-President Barack Obama wore a tan suit during a 2014 press conference and was promptly called “unpresidential” on Fox News. The move was indicative of a “lack of seriousness,” then-Representative Peter King (R-NY) also huffed.
“A man should never lick an ice cream cone in public,” Watters declared. “A man can only eat ice cream on vacation. I guess Biden is always on vacation, so it makes sense. But if a man needs to eat ice cream in public, he should scoop it out of a bowl with a spoon.”

Quote:
But Watters couldn’t leave the ice cream issue alone. “The president of the United States licking things, especially ice cream, is childish, it’s frivolous, and it’s too casual a look for the country,” he griped. “Biden’s brain freeze will live in infamy. And just like [George W.] Bush gave up golf after 9/11, Biden should give up ice cream after the recession. You’re not at a birthday party, Joe.”

Clutch those pearls and get out the smelling salts, Jesse.

 

[ZiprHead]

My take on the above, Real men don't lick their food, they throw it.

 

[Shadowy Man]

Quote:
But Watters couldn’t leave the ice cream issue alone. “The president of the United States licking things, especially ice cream, is childish, it’s frivolous, and it’s too casual a look for the country,” he griped. “Biden’s brain freeze will live in infamy. And just like [George W.] Bush gave up golf after 9/11, Biden should give up ice cream after the recession. You’re not at a birthday party, Joe.”

Did Trump give up golf after Covid?

 

[Patooka]

Every accusation from the right is a confession.

 

[Shadowy Man]

I mean, who hasn’t been stressed, right?

 

[ZiprHead]

Republicans blasted for taking credit for infrastructure spending after voting ‘no’

Democrats are promising to keep a close eye throughout 2022 on GOP lawmakers who voted against the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law but are now, in some form, touting the effects.

news.yahoo.com

Democrats are promising to keep tabs during the 2022 campaign on Republican lawmakers praising projects funded by the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law even though they voted against it.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's office blasted out a compilation of the growing list — and journalists have also been taking note.

Lawmakers like Rep. Steve Scalise (R-LA), Clay Higgins (R-LA), Rep. Kay Granger (R-TX), Rep. Ashley Hinson (R-IA), Rep. Michelle Steel (R-CA) and Rep. Andy Harris (R-MD) have all touted parts of the $14 billion recently allocated from the law to the Army Corps of Engineers making its way to their districts.

During a recent interview with Yahoo Finance, a senior Democratic official said the mixed messages on infrastructure would definitely come up in negative ads against Republicans during midterm elections. “You’re going to see it,” said Brad Woodhouse, a senior adviser to the Democratic National Committee. He added those ads are going to come from local campaigns as well as "out of Super PACs.”