• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

A day without stupid?

Right wing asshole Andrew Tate posted on Twitter mocking environmental activist Greta Thunberg. She makes a good snarky response. Tate responds with a video showing how much of an asshole he is.

Now HERE is the stupid. The video included a pizza box from a Romanian pizza chain. Tate is wanted in Romania for some connection to human trafficking. With him posting proof he was currently in the country, the place he shares with his brother was raided, and they have both been arrested.

 
Andrew Tate on Twitter: "Hello @GretaThunberg
I have 33 cars.
My Bugatti has a w16 8.0L quad turbo.
My TWO Ferrari 812 competizione have 6.5L v12s.
This is just the start.
Please provide your email address so I can send a complete list of my car collection and their respective enormous emissions. (pic link)" / Twitter

Showing him with one of his cars.

She responded
Greta Thunberg on Twitter: "yes, please do enlighten me. email me at smalldickenergy@getalife.com" / Twitter

He first responded
Andrew Tate on Twitter: "@GretaThunberg How dare you?!" / Twitter
then
Andrew Tate on Twitter: "Thank you for confirming via your email address that you have a small penis @GretaThunberg
The world was curious.
And I do agree you should get a life ❤️ (vid link)" / Twitter

Showing more of AT vs. GT.

"How dare you?" is an allusion to
Transcript: Greta Thunberg's Speech At The U.N. Climate Action Summit : NPR - back in 2019
My message is that we'll be watching you.

"This is all wrong. I shouldn't be up here. I should be back in school on the other side of the ocean. Yet you all come to us young people for hope. How dare you!

"You have stolen my dreams and my childhood with your empty words. And yet I'm one of the lucky ones. People are suffering. People are dying. Entire ecosystems are collapsing. We are in the beginning of a mass extinction, and all you can talk about is money and fairy tales of eternal economic growth. How dare you!
 
A few months earlier, Controversial influencer Andrew Tate claims ‘depression isn’t real’ | news.com.au — Australia’s leading news site
Interviewed by Piers Morgan.
“I believe that feeling depressed is real. I don’t believe that depression as a clinical disease is real,” the controversial internet star said.

The Sky News host disagreed with Tate’s comment.

“Not an eminent doctor in the world would agree with you,” Morgan said.

“You think you know more than doctors?”

Tate argued that he doesn’t believe the condition.

“I can’t become clinically depressed because I don’t believe in it,” he said.

“I can’t be haunted by ghosts if I don’t believe in ghosts.”
 
Andrew Tate detained in Romania over rape and human trafficking case - BBC News
The former kickboxer rose to fame in 2016 when he was removed from British TV show Big Brother over a video which appeared to show him attacking a woman.

He went on to gain notoriety online, with Twitter banning him for saying women should "bear responsibility" for being sexually assaulted. He has since been reinstated.

Despite social media bans he gained popularity, particularly among young men, by promoting an ultra-masculine, ultra-luxurious lifestyle.

He regularly appeared in videos with a fleet of expensive sports cars, on private jets, and enjoying expensive holidays.
I think that he moved to Romania when he got enough money to live there without needing a job there. He did so 5 years ago.

"The four suspects... appear to have created an organised crime group with the purpose of recruiting, housing and exploiting women by forcing them to create pornographic content meant to be seen on specialised websites for a cost," according to the Directorate for Investigating Organised Crime and Terrorism (DIICOT) of Romania. AT and his brother Tristan will be detained for an additional 30 days. The two were shown in social media being led away from a luxury villa.
They were later forced to perform in pornographic content under threat of violence, the statement said.

Police also released a video of the raid, showing guns, knives, and money on display in one room.

...
In the footage he posted, he was handed a pizza box from a local restaurant, which some users suggested had inadvertently revealed his location.

However, the pizza box is not thought to be relevant.

...
Following the arrest, she tweeted "this is what happens when you don't recycle your pizza boxes," referring to the online rumour.
 
Andrew Tate detained in Romania over rape and human trafficking case - BBC News
The former kickboxer rose to fame in 2016 when he was removed from British TV show Big Brother over a video which appeared to show him attacking a woman.

He went on to gain notoriety online, with Twitter banning him for saying women should "bear responsibility" for being sexually assaulted. He has since been reinstated.

Despite social media bans he gained popularity, particularly among young men, by promoting an ultra-masculine, ultra-luxurious lifestyle.

He regularly appeared in videos with a fleet of expensive sports cars, on private jets, and enjoying expensive holidays.
I think that he moved to Romania when he got enough money to live there without needing a job there. He did so 5 years ago.

"The four suspects... appear to have created an organised crime group with the purpose of recruiting, housing and exploiting women by forcing them to create pornographic content meant to be seen on specialised websites for a cost," according to the Directorate for Investigating Organised Crime and Terrorism (DIICOT) of Romania. AT and his brother Tristan will be detained for an additional 30 days. The two were shown in social media being led away from a luxury villa.
They were later forced to perform in pornographic content under threat of violence, the statement said.

Police also released a video of the raid, showing guns, knives, and money on display in one room.

...
In the footage he posted, he was handed a pizza box from a local restaurant, which some users suggested had inadvertently revealed his location.

However, the pizza box is not thought to be relevant.

...
Following the arrest, she tweeted "this is what happens when you don't recycle your pizza boxes," referring to the online rumour.
Savage. :rofl:
 


Can someone tell me what broke the stalemate in WWI? I'm not a stable genius like Musk is.
 


Can someone tell me what broke the stalemate in WWI? I'm not a stable genius like Musk is.

The German Spring Offensive of 1918, using the troops no longer required on the Eastern Front, was the main factor. Paradoxically, Germany was a victim of her own success.

Having been successfully worn down by the war, and by the blockades that prevented the Central Powers from importing useful quantities of materiel, the German lines had become dependent on a logistical support network that had grown up alongside the near stationary front, and when their forces succeeded in pushing the French and British forces back, their logistics were unable to keep up - mainly as a result of the broken ground that the war had made almost impassable to supply trains*. Their attempt to break the point of contact between British and French armies almost succeeded, but again this worked against the Germans, as it finally gave the Allies the kick in the pants needed to unify command, with the British for the first time in the war allowing a Frenchman, General Ferdinand Foch, to command British forces.

Unable to obtain the necessary ammunition, food, fuel or replacement troops, the advance faltered, and was pushed back; When it reached the old fortified front lines, the German Army lacked the ability to stop the momentum of their retreat, and couldn't reconsolidate the defensive posture that had kept them in France since the front solidified in 1914. The Allies, now bolstered by American men and supplies, pushed the Germans into a near rout, and it rapidly became clear that they no longer had sufficient strength and cohesion to prevent French and British advances.

The tank played a minor role in all of this; The first truly successful use of tanks at Cambrai at the end of November 1917 demonstrated that they could be effective in breaking enemy lines (particularly when used in close coordination with both infantry and air forces), but the successful counterattack by the Germans demonstrated also that, at that time, not much had changed since 1914, with breakthroughs being difficult to achieve, but impossible to consolidate. The ability to reinforce and resupply the line was always the main issue, and that ability always strongly favoured the defenders, who were falling back towards their supplies and reserves, and disfavoured the attackers who were leaving an impassable barrier of fortifications and shell holes between themselves and their logistics trains.

The Germans defeated themselves, by leaving their well established and well supplied fortified front line, at a time when their national ability to support the war effort was almost completely exhausted, and troops were desperately underfed, and low in morale. They pushed the Allies into a position of advantage, while capturing very little that was strategically valuable to either side. And when they were, inevitably, checked and reversed, their retreat turned into a rout.

Had they Germans not launched their Spring Offensive, they likely would have been forced to request an armistice by the end of 1918 or early 1919, due to the starving of their home front; But if they had done so while still occupying the mostly stable front line that they had held for four years, and while still in possession of large areas of France, the terms would presumably have been far less unpleasant to them than the actual terms of the Treaty of Versailles, and might even have been sufficiently tolerable as to avoid the need for round two, twenty years later.

The Great War saw a number of novel weapons that were expected to radically change the outcome (gas, aircraft, camouflage, tanks, etc.), but none of these really had a big enough effect to do that. The tank often gets more credit than it deserves, largely because it was very successful on day one at Cambrai, and that success came only a few months ahead of a general un-freezing of the lines that was directly attributable to the Spring Offensive. From the perspective of the newspaper reading Londoners, it was as though the new British secret weapon had dramatically changed the entire nature of the war on the Western Front, but really, that was more propaganda than reality. That the Germans tripped over their own dicks while successfully pushing back the Allies, was never going to fall so effectively into national myth.





*Horse drawn wagon trains, not railways, although both sides did use narrow gauge railways right up to the front at various places
 


Can someone tell me what broke the stalemate in WWI? I'm not a stable genius like Musk is.

And he's wrong, anyway.

It's infantry + artillery + missiles. And observation sufficient to put artillery (including stuff like HIMARS) on ammo dumps. This makes for a very different battlefield than WWI where interdicting logistics wasn't an appreciable factor.
 
This makes for a very different battlefield than WWI where interdicting logistics wasn't an appreciable factor.
Tell that to the poor bastards who had to resupply the front lines.

Interdiction of logistics beyond artillery range (typically 5-10 miles behind the front line) was not really possible for either side in the Great War, but inside that forward zone, logistics was made extremely difficult by artillery, often supported by aerial spotting, from planes, balloons, and even kites.

In muddy areas, such as the Ypres salient, the artillery could target the roads in the certain knowledge that heavy equipment couldn't be brought up cross country, so having ranged upon the road during the daytime, they could effectively deny the route to supply trains at night as well.
 
This makes for a very different battlefield than WWI where interdicting logistics wasn't an appreciable factor.
Tell that to the poor bastards who had to resupply the front lines.

Interdiction of logistics beyond artillery range (typically 5-10 miles behind the front line) was not really possible for either side in the Great War, but inside that forward zone, logistics was made extremely difficult by artillery, often supported by aerial spotting, from planes, balloons, and even kites.

In muddy areas, such as the Ypres salient, the artillery could target the roads in the certain knowledge that heavy equipment couldn't be brought up cross country, so having ranged upon the road during the daytime, they could effectively deny the route to supply trains at night as well.
Russia has it much worse, though.
 
Back
Top Bottom