Jean Marie Le Pen died

[RVonse]

You can not introduce huge numbers into an existing population too fast without destroying what was already there.

US History speaks otherwise. We received around one million immigrants in a year in the early 1900s. Those immigrants (hated then too) helped build our nation.

Yes that is exactly correct. For better or worse those 1900's immigrants totally destroyed the existing native indian culture to build our nation. We can argue whether or not the culture we have now is better or not. But there should be agreement that the indian culture that then existed was indeed totally destroyed and replaced by what we currently enjoy today.

And yes, the indians hated those immigrants then just like we hate them today. They hated them so bad some of them lost their scalps.

 

[RVonse]

And that is a very bad thing if you happen to feel (as I do) that western culture has been the best thing the world has ever seen in terms of freedom and liberty.

So the people south of the border are mongrels and vandals who are living some other kind of culture?

You say freedom and liberty, what you appear to mean is you subscribe to the Manifest Destiny. The Asians inferior too? Or just the ones from nations you can't readily identify on a map?

If someone else has a culture with more freedom than western civilization I would be interested because I might want to move there myself.

 

[laughing dog]

You can not introduce huge numbers into an existing population too fast without destroying what was already there.

US History speaks otherwise. We received around one million immigrants in a year in the early 1900s. Those immigrants (hated then too) helped build our nation.

Yes that is exactly correct. For better or worse those 1900's immigrants totally destroyed the existing native indian culture to build our nation.

Your historical timeline is off. The decimation of native American culture occurred before the 1900s.

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

You can not introduce huge numbers into an existing population too fast without destroying what was already there.

US History speaks otherwise. We received around one million immigrants in a year in the early 1900s. Those immigrants (hated then too) helped build our nation.

Yes that is exactly correct. For better or worse those 1900's immigrants totally destroyed the existing native indian culture to build our nation.

*jaw drop*

Andrew Jackson was President well before the 1900's immigration. French and Indian War was ever more further back.

We can argue whether or not the culture we have now is better or not.

Well you know what they say about the difference between a petri dish and the United States. Given two hundred years, the petri dish would develop a culture.

Spoiler

But there should be agreement that the indian culture that then existed was indeed totally destroyed and replaced by what we currently enjoy today.

That started in the 17th century. Also, that was more European conquering than "immigration".

And yes, the indians hated those immigrants then just like we hate them today.

Yeah... like they hate people calling them "Indians". Here you bemoaning the plight of the First Nations / Native Americans.... and you can't even call refer to them appropriately.

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

And that is a very bad thing if you happen to feel (as I do) that western culture has been the best thing the world has ever seen in terms of freedom and liberty.

So the people south of the border are mongrels and vandals who are living some other kind of culture?

You say freedom and liberty, what you appear to mean is you subscribe to the Manifest Destiny. The Asians inferior too? Or just the ones from nations you can't readily identify on a map?

If someone else has a culture with more freedom than western civilization I would be interested because I might want to move there myself.

You didn't answer the question. Actually, you didn't answer any of them.

 

[bilby]

Brexit didn't happen because of Muslims.

"Of course it did. You can't tell us that the Poles and Czechs aren't Muslims; They are foreign, for fuck's sake. How much more Muslim can you even get?" - Daily Mail "readers".

 

[Loren Pechtel]

The immigration rate is just too high for any kind of rational assimilation of existing western values. It would be one thing if the existing European culture was more compatible with the muslim culture but in this case their compassion is mistaken for weakness. In the newcomers eyes, compassionate is treated "like women who need to be mounted" and not assimilation to an existing culture.

I don't think it's the immigration rate per se, but rather too many from one culture.

 

[ZiprHead]

The immigration rate is just too high for any kind of rational assimilation of existing western values. It would be one thing if the existing European culture was more compatible with the muslim culture but in this case their compassion is mistaken for weakness. In the newcomers eyes, compassionate is treated "like women who need to be mounted" and not assimilation to an existing culture.

I don't think it's the immigration rate per se, but rather too many from one culture.

How did you two determine this magical too high point?

 

[Loren Pechtel]

The immigration rate is just too high for any kind of rational assimilation of existing western values. It would be one thing if the existing European culture was more compatible with the muslim culture but in this case their compassion is mistaken for weakness. In the newcomers eyes, compassionate is treated "like women who need to be mounted" and not assimilation to an existing culture.

I don't think it's the immigration rate per se, but rather too many from one culture.

How did you two determine this magical too high point?

I don't know how much is safe.

Personally, I think the problem is more the radicalization efforts of the Islamists than sheer numbers, anyway.

 

[ZiprHead]

The immigration rate is just too high for any kind of rational assimilation of existing western values. It would be one thing if the existing European culture was more compatible with the muslim culture but in this case their compassion is mistaken for weakness. In the newcomers eyes, compassionate is treated "like women who need to be mounted" and not assimilation to an existing culture.

I don't think it's the immigration rate per se, but rather too many from one culture.

How did you two determine this magical too high point?

I don't know how much is safe.

Personally, I think the problem is more the radicalization efforts of the Islamists than sheer numbers, anyway.

You only need one to be radicalized to be a problem so your resonse doesn't answer the question.

 

[Loren Pechtel]

The immigration rate is just too high for any kind of rational assimilation of existing western values. It would be one thing if the existing European culture was more compatible with the muslim culture but in this case their compassion is mistaken for weakness. In the newcomers eyes, compassionate is treated "like women who need to be mounted" and not assimilation to an existing culture.

I don't think it's the immigration rate per se, but rather too many from one culture.

How did you two determine this magical too high point?

I don't know how much is safe.

Personally, I think the problem is more the radicalization efforts of the Islamists than sheer numbers, anyway.

You only need one to be radicalized to be a problem so your resonse doesn't answer the question.

I'm saying I don't have an answer. All I can do is look at the world and see that substantial Muslim minority populations lead to trouble. But we react with "that's racism" rather than any attempt to understand what's actually going on.