The fact that you are spreading Neo-Nazi propaganda doesn't necessarily make you Neo-Nazi.
And just because you dislike something, even dislike it strongly, does not make it "Neo-Nazi".
That is the Neo-Nazi framing of it. What he said is we get elected to positions of power, we get a say in deciding what is taught in schools, JUST LIKE EVERYONE ELSE IN POWER DOES.
But he framed it as an ethnic/religious group getting power over things like school curricula. Note his use of "we". That is in contrast to "they", i.e. those who do not belong to his ingroup. You even unconsciously understand it, since you did use the pronoun "we" when explaining his position, even if you don't want to acknowledge the implication.
And that you assume Anas Aswar is an Islamist just because he has Pakistani ethnicity is proof of your racism. It is just oozing from every pore in your body.
Wrong. First, he is using "us vs. them" language. Second, his wife is covered up, which means he is religious.
Also, dude, his name is Anas Sarwar, not Aswar.
He didn't even mention what he wants taught in schools. You assuming to know it must be illiberal/Islamist is racism, bar none.
He wants more Muslim/Pakistani influence in school curricula. And we know what these groups generally support and oppose.
Then why the fuck would you automatically assume he supports this when he said nothing of the sort?
If a Christian politicians we to say, in a Christian event, something like "time is coming where we will get to decide what is taught in schools", don't tell me you would not be concerned. But to the left, Muslims get a pass. And even worse, anybody who disagrees gets labeled "racist" and even "Neo-Nazi".
As if it is already an accepted fact. Not to beat a dead horse, but you are being racist for doing so.
Islam is still not a race.
And I bring up the MAGA stuff (and it's equivalent in the UK), because the illiberal threat from them is orders of magnitude more severe than that of conservative Muslims due to their much bigger numbers voting and in positions of power.
That is certainly not the case in the UK, where Islamization is well advanced.
Even in the US there are enclaves where Muslims have taken over. For example Hamtramck, where the Left supported the Muslims and are now surprised Pikachu face that the Muslims are acting like Muslims and are, for example, banning LGBT flags from city property.
A sense of betrayal’: liberal dismay as Muslim-led US city bans Pride flags
Over and over again, the Left sides with Islam and are then surprised when they get stabbed in the back. It's the old "Queers for Palestine" thing when "queers" are going to get persecuted, and might get killed, in Palestine.
And I don't at all oppose speaking up against those who support illiberalism whether Christian or Muslim. Where it becomes racist/Islamophobic is assuming automatically based on ethnicity or religion that they automatically want illiberal things based on that alone, and then spreading fear about everything they say using white nationalist/neo-nazi framing. That is what I will call out.
Nothing automatic about that. Sarwar formulated it in a sectarian way, as "us vs. them".
Also, you have to see it in light of the rest of the thread, which is about several Islamists getting elected in council elections, when when they are spouting antisemitic hatred or want to do away with "free gender mixing". But I am sure you will find a way to defend that too, and disparage anybody who dare object.
