Perhaps before 7/10. But certainly not now. Thinking that there is another workable option is just fantasy. The sooner Hamas is gone, the fewer casualties long term.
You say, 'The sooner Hamas is gone, the fewer casualties long-term,' as if I haven’t already said, countless times, that Hamas needs to be eradicated. At this point, I think it’s fair to ask if you even know how to read. The only real difference between us is that you don’t seem to have a line in the sand for how many Palestinian deaths are too many in exchange for eliminating Hamas, because you don't value their lives at all. I’ll ask again, do the people working on your project know this about you? And if they did, would they still choose to be involved?
Its the opposite. Hamas needs to be removed to protect the lives of both Israelis and Gazans.
You're basically arguing for that we shouldn't have removed Hitler because it would have hurt the German people. It's a rediculous stance. You're tying your back preventing us from defending what's right.
I think its you who don't value any lives.
I'm angry over all the dead Palestinians. But my anger is directed towards Hamas. Not Israel.
A better question to ask is how many more needs to die before you think Hamas needs to go? Clearly you are cool about the 7/10 attack. I'm not.
The 7/10 attack was the line in the sand. Hamas clearly thinks Palestinian lives are expendable. That makes me think its more important to remove them. Not less
