Legal definition of woman is based on biological sex, UK supreme court rules

[seanie]

You need an accountant to tell you that men’s sports tend to generate more revenue?

Did you miss this bit?

 

[laughing dog]

You could try explaining how separate men’s and women’s sports are allowed, whilst discrimination on the basis of sex is forbidden?

How does that work?

Very well.

How so?

Which of the two words “very” or “well” don’t you understand? Be specific about your confusion.

 

[seanie]

What are the viewing figures for the NBA v the WNBA?

 

[seanie]

You could try explaining how separate men’s and women’s sports are allowed, whilst discrimination on the basis of sex is forbidden?

How does that work?

Very well.

How so?

Which of the two words “very” or “well” don’t you understand? Be specific about your confusion.

You haven’t explained how there can be separate men’s and women’s sports, whilst discriminating on the basis of sex is forbidden.

Apparently.

 

[laughing dog]

You could try explaining how separate men’s and women’s sports are allowed, whilst discrimination on the basis of sex is forbidden?

How does that work?

Very well.

How so?

Which of the two words “very” or “well” don’t you understand? Be specific about your confusion.

You haven’t explained how there can be separate men’s and women’s sports, whilst discriminating on the basis of sex is forbidden.

Apparently.

There’s nothing to be ashamed about not understanding words. Instead of evading the question with another question, just answer the question if you are truly seeking enlightenment.

 

[seanie]

If Title IX forbids discrimination in the basis of sex, how are there separate categories for men and women in American sports?

 

[seanie]

You could try explaining how separate men’s and women’s sports are allowed, whilst discrimination on the basis of sex is forbidden?

How does that work?

Very well.

How so?

Which of the two words “very” or “well” don’t you understand? Be specific about your confusion.

You haven’t explained how there can be separate men’s and women’s sports, whilst discriminating on the basis of sex is forbidden.

Apparently.

There’s nothing to be ashamed about not understanding words. Instead of evading the question with another question, just answer the question if you are truly seeking enlightenment.

How are there separate women’s and men’s sports, if discrimination on the basis of sex is forbidden?

 

[seanie]

Feel free to explain.

 

[laughing dog]

If Title IX forbids discrimination in the basis of sex, how are there separate categories for men and women in American sports?

If someone persistently repeats a question to which they acknowledge understanding the answer, how can they be considered to a serious participant?

 

[seanie]

No, Title IX forbids exclusions on the basis of sex

?

 

[laughing dog]

Feel free to explain.

I did in 2947 which you seemed to understand in post 2505. Have you gad a stroke or suffered some sort of trauma to your brain?

 

[seanie]

I’ve e been told that Title IX forbids discrimination on the basis of sex.

But that separate men’s and women’s sporting categories are allowed.

How does that work?

Explain.

 

[Bomb#20]

View attachment 50990

Let's consider that one some more.

Frame #3, what you are missing is that it removes any incentive to better yourself. You'll get the same results if you put in effort or don't

And all the frames--you think stealing is justice? Why are they going to put on a ball game if they're not paid to do so?

Wow. Just wow.

I am continually amazed at just how far you will contort yourself to justify a status quo that inordinately favors you, a white heterosexual male with blonde hair and I’m assuming blue eyes. I am assuming you are also an only child.

You see kids stealing. I see an illustration for the differences in privilege, equality, equity and justice. Apparently for you, justice means stealing, and the only value to anything is limiting its access, no matter who is hurt.

You assume the baseball game is being performed for pay. Apparently you never engaged in team sports, either.

Earlier you accused Loren of being racist because he was against racial discrimination; now you're accusing him of being racist because he's in favor of property rights, Ms. "I respect Loren almost always"? If that's how you talk to people you respect, how do you talk to people you don't respect?

Which completely fails to address the equity issue.

And note that I'm not the only one who recognized that your "justice" frame doesn't work.

I definitely know that you are not the only person completely at home with his white male straight cis blonde haired blue eyed privilege who has zero intention of relaxing his death grip on that privilege.

Although, tbh, the cis, straight blonde and blue eyed part is not required for that death hold on white or male privilege.

You knew, of course, that Loren was talking about me when he said he's not the only one. Are you talking about me too when you say you know Loren's not the only one? Are you accusing me of racism because I don't think tearing down a fence somebody put up on his property is "Justice"?

Once upon a time left-wing ideologues tried to sell abolishing property rights by claiming economic theory proved capitalism was exploitative, but then economists realized the Labor Theory of Value was metaphysical drivel. So then left-wing ideologues tried to sell abolishing property rights by telling the common people it would be good for them because property only benefits the rich, but then they tried it over and over, and the common people always got a police state and usually a famine out of it. So now left-wing ideologues are trying to sell abolishing property rights by claiming everyone who disagrees with them is a racist. Unless the trend in leftists' arguments' intellectual sophistication reverses, their current iteration will have to be the last.

 

[seanie]

I’ve e been told that Title IX forbids discrimination on the basis of sex.

But that separate men’s and women’s sporting categories are allowed.

How does that work?

Explain.

I mean, I know the answer.

Politesse was just talking shit.

But because you’re ideologically on the same side, you have to pretend they weren’t talking shit.

Because that’s how you roll.

 

[seanie]

It should be embarrassing, but it’s almost certainly not.

 

[laughing dog]

I’ve e been told that Title IX forbids discrimination on the basis of sex.

But that separate men’s and women’s sporting categories are allowed.

How does that work?

Explain.

I mean, I know the answer.

Politesse was just talking shit.

But because you’re ideologically on the same side, you have to pretend they weren’t talking shit.

Because that’s how you roll.

You need to define what you mean by “shit” in this context.

I don’t have the desire to wade through your persistent “obtuseness “ and Politesse’s replies nor the energy to try to explain to the satisfaction of someone who pretends to be stupid.

 

[seanie]

No I don’t.

You’re just being silly, because that’s who you are.

 

[seanie]

Tell me how Title IX simultaneously forbids discrimination on the basis of sex, yet allows separate men’s and women’s sports categories.

Can you do that?

 

[seanie]

Is that a difficult question?

 

[Toni]

You could try explaining how separate men’s and women’s sports are allowed, whilst discrimination on the basis of sex is forbidden?

How does that work?

Very well.

How so?

What’s the justification for separate men’s and women’s sports, if discrimination on the basis is sex is forbidden?

Asked and answered: Separate but equal.