Ends don't ALWAYS justify means.
This tango has always required two, and Bibi is one of them.
Bibi honestly reminds me of George Bush, not the most inspiring leader, prone to mistakes, but when you consider what’s waiting around the corner, he starts to look a lot more measured. Some of his coalition partners are openly calling for the mass displacement of Palestinians, and that’s a nightmare scenario. In that context, Netanyahu is far from a problem, it’s the extremists around him who risk turning this conflict into a generational disaster (not saying it isn't already one).
The same way Loren and DrZoidberg push genocidal rhetoric that doesn’t even reflect Israel’s own official stance, these voices aren’t helping, they’re ensuring the cycle continues for decades, maybe centuries.
Right now, there are two real paths forward. And I think Netanyahu, despite everything, is choosing the more realistic one: cutting off the leadership of hostile forces while leaving open the possibility of working with the people of Iran and Palestine to build something better. That’s the exact approach I suggested
light years ago in this discussion. But instead of engaging with that vision, I was told I’m living in a fantasy and accused, both knowingly and unknowingly, of supporting Hamas propaganda.
Turns out, pushing for peace while rejecting extremism on
both sides is somehow more controversial than it should be.
Anyway, the Palestinians will need to make some major adjustments. They need a significantly stronger emphasis on nonviolent resistance, diplomacy, and showcasing Palestinian civil society, education, and innovation to counteract the narrative that "Palestinians = terrorists." I believe that can and will succeed but it will be a very steep clime considering they'd have to endure a rightfully pissed off Israel.
Edit: That and the fact Gaza's infrastructure is all but gone.