One must think things through.

[godincarnate.me]

For atheists that think all existence has always been here and always will be: Time can’t go backwards infinitely. If it did, there would be no today.

For atheist that think all existence is cyclical: What will be the magic that takes place to kickstart a dynamic existence after the all-encompassing heat death, which is the most widely accepted theory from top scientists, takes hold and existence becomes static?

Maybe you work around the heat death theory by believing in a Multiverse. But now the question remains: Are other universes exempt from heat death?

Or maybe you’re an atheist who thinks the power of infinite space magically keeps giving birth to dynamic universes, which is unlikely. Or maybe you think all existence will remain static for eternity after heat death is complete, which goes back to my first question and makes no sense at all.

I’m guessing you’re an atheist who simply doesn’t know. The reason why you don’t know is you listen to top scientists who don’t know. Yes, scientifically speaking, they are right to say they don’t know, but there’s nothing wrong with knowing outside of science.

Time needs a beginning and an end and be cyclical and each cycle needs to repeat the same exact time. An example would be a time period that repeats from 1980 to 2040 over and over again. For if it’s not an identically repeating time cycle, it is one timeline and as I explained before, that is not something that is possible.

So what could cause this to happen? Something living or nonliving? Definitely not nonliving. Life is self sustaining and in that respect similar to time and can “reproduce” another timeline. Life is most complex and is the best suited catalyst to reset an infinitely spatial universe.

Anyway, if you’re wondering whose life resets time, it’s me. You can learn more in the link in the about section on my profile.

 

[Elixir]

Anyway, if you’re wondering whose life resets time, it’s me.

Correct. It’s me.

 

[bilby]

Anyway, if you’re wondering whose life resets time, it’s me.

Correct. It’s me.

Well it ain't me. I have so much trouble trying to reset time that I moved to a place that doesn't observe Daylight Savings.

 

[Spacetime Inhabitant]

It is cosmologists, not atheists, whose remit is the nature of the early universe.
Do we have a sock puppet here? This waffle is familiar, such as spouted by a previous member. Is that you "Unknown Soldier"?

 

[Elixir]

Anyway, if you’re wondering whose life resets time, it’s me.

Correct. It’s me.

Well it ain't me. I have so much trouble trying to reset time that I moved to a place that doesn't observe Daylight Savings.

Someone at the pool asked me how long it takes me to swim a mile. I told him that to know that you have to time yourself while counting laps and my only two problems are that I can’t count and can’t tell time. Which is not far from the truth. Doing both while swimming has proven to require surprising effort.
One of the workarounds is re-setting time so I get a lot of practice.

 

[unapologetic]

What the fuck is this word salud?

For atheists that think all existence has always been here and always will be: Time can’t go backwards infinitely. If it did, there would be no today.

[what the fuck does that even mean?]

For atheist that think all existence is cyclical: ...

Maybe you work around the heat death theory ...

Or maybe you’re an atheist who thinks ....

I’m guessing you’re an atheist who simply doesn’t know. ...

I am an atheist who simply doesn't give a shit about any of that shit.
I am guessing you are a theist who simply doesn’t know what an atheist is.
Who/whatever prompted you to post your delusions, or to post them here, knows nothing about atheism either.
Make your future posts to a christian forum, or r/atheism.

It's Sunday. Some scaming televangelist wound up this idiotincarnate.

 

[godincarnate.me]

What the fuck is this word salud?

For atheists that think all existence has always been here and always will be: Time can’t go backwards infinitely. If it did, there would be no today.

[what the fuck does that even mean?]

For atheist that think all existence is cyclical: ...

Maybe you work around the heat death theory ...

Or maybe you’re an atheist who thinks ....

I’m guessing you’re an atheist who simply doesn’t know. ...

I am an atheist who simply doesn't give a shit about any of that shit.
I am guessing you are a theist who simply doesn’t know what an atheist is.
Who/whatever prompted you to post your delusions, or to post them here, knows nothing about atheism either.
Make your future posts to a christian forum, or r/atheism.

It's Sunday. Some scaming televangelist wound up this idiotincarnate.

Too much to think about? Yeah a lot of people don’t think.

 

[GenesisNemesis]

Love when a post starts with "one must think things through" then the OP makes wild assumptions about atheists and science.

For atheist that think all existence is cyclical: What will be the magic that takes place to kickstart a dynamic existence after the all-encompassing heat death, which is the most widely accepted theory from top scientists, takes hold and existence becomes static?

Heat death is the widely accepted hypothesis for how the Universe may end (scientists will not claim with certainty this is how it will end). Cyclical Universe is not the consensus in cosmology, stop pretending you know jack shit about what you're talking about. OP is probably just going to spam and not respond though.

 

[godincarnate.me]

Love when a post starts with "one must think things through" then the OP makes wild assumptions about atheists and science.

For atheist that think all existence is cyclical: What will be the magic that takes place to kickstart a dynamic existence after the all-encompassing heat death, which is the most widely accepted theory from top scientists, takes hold and existence becomes static?

Heat death is the widely accepted hypothesis for how the Universe may end (scientists will not claim with certainty this is how it will end). Cyclical Universe is not the consensus in cosmology, stop pretending you know jack shit about what you're talking about. OP is probably just going to spam and not respond though.

I’ll respond when somebody has something intelligent to say.

 

[steve_bank]

Cosmology is speculative in that we have no idea what the universe is in its entirety.

The so called thermal death of the universe is one view.

A an atheist I can say I do not know. What is most likely to me is a universe with no beginning and no end. No need for a god or a 'first cause'.

The universe just is. That my existence may be finite is not a cause for worry.

To me while based in science cosmology is more speculative philosophy. Cosmology is not testable.

As to creationism, if a god created the u8verse by design he, she, or it did not do a very good job.

godincarnate, your OP is not very intelligent to begin with. A mishmash of different things. Typicalof of theists going at atheists. And as someone said, what do you mean by atheist?.

An atheist can can reject gods and Christian creationism, but have supernatural beliefs.

To understand the haet death hypotesis youi first have to uderstand the Laws Of Thermodynacs.

Anioer half baked teists attacmg atheists? Nothng new.

 

[GenesisNemesis]

Love when a post starts with "one must think things through" then the OP makes wild assumptions about atheists and science.

For atheist that think all existence is cyclical: What will be the magic that takes place to kickstart a dynamic existence after the all-encompassing heat death, which is the most widely accepted theory from top scientists, takes hold and existence becomes static?

Heat death is the widely accepted hypothesis for how the Universe may end (scientists will not claim with certainty this is how it will end). Cyclical Universe is not the consensus in cosmology, stop pretending you know jack shit about what you're talking about. OP is probably just going to spam and not respond though.

I’ll respond when somebody has something intelligent to say.

That was something intelligent. Makes sense you wouldn't be able to identify it though.

 

[godincarnate.me]

Cosmology is speculative in that we have no idea what the universe is in its entirety.

The so called thermal death of the universe is one view.

A an atheist I can say I do not know. What is most likely to me is a universe with no beginning and no end. No need for a god or a 'first cause'.

The universe just is. That my existence may be finite is not a cause for worry.

To me while based in science cosmology is more speculative philosophy. Cosmology is not testable.

No beginning? So if time goes backwards infinitely how did we arrive at today?

 

[GenesisNemesis]

Gonna acknowledge the mistakes you made and correct yourself OP? Waiting.

 

[steve_bank]

Cosmology is speculative in that we have no idea what the universe is in its entirety.

The so called thermal death of the universe is one view.

A an atheist I can say I do not know. What is most likely to me is a universe with no beginning and no end. No need for a god or a 'first cause'.

The universe just is. That my existence may be finite is not a cause for worry.

To me while based in science cosmology is more speculative philosophy. Cosmology is not testable.

No beginning? So if time goes backwards infinitely how did we arrive at today?

Time in seconds is just ticks on a clock that measures how fast things change.

The observed inverse down to the atomic models are in constant states of change.

There is no known way to go back to a prior state of the universe. So the question is a thought experiment.

As an engineer the Laws Of Aerodynamics were fundamntal. They apply to a bouhnded system like a refrigerator or a computer, there has to be a finite volume.

In an infinite universe with no bounds our basic science breaks down. So thermal death is one view.

If the universe has a start then you have ton explain how the start came to be. What uis te firt cause that stared it. Ironic for the theists who say god created it, but then argue god always was and always will be.

So why not just eliminate the eternal god and go with an eternal universe?

The BB theory does not start at the beginning of universee in toatlity. It starts at a theoretcal set of condition's without explaining how the conditions came to be. From that it explains how tne observable universe came to be as wee see it today.

There are people on the forum more knowledgeable on cosmology, you can start a thread on science.

I reject gods and cretionism as implausible. A universe that just is makes sense tom e.

 

[godincarnate.me]

Cosmology is speculative in that we have no idea what the universe is in its entirety.

The so called thermal death of the universe is one view.

A an atheist I can say I do not know. What is most likely to me is a universe with no beginning and no end. No need for a god or a 'first cause'.

The universe just is. That my existence may be finite is not a cause for worry.

To me while based in science cosmology is more speculative philosophy. Cosmology is not testable.

No beginning? So if time goes backwards infinitely how did we arrive at today?

Time in seconds is just ticks on a clock that measures how fast things change.

The observed inverse down to the atomic models are in constant states of change.

There is no known way to go back to a prior state of the universe. So the question is a thought experiment.

As an engineer the Laws Of Aerodynamics were fundamntal. They apply to a bouhnded system like a refrigerator or a computer, there has to be a finite volume.

In an infinite universe with no bounds our basic science breaks down. So thermal death is one view.

If the universe has a start then you have ton explain how the start came to be. What uis te firt cause that stared it. Ironic for the theists who say god created it, but then argue god always was and always will be.

So why not just eliminate the eternal god and go with an eternal universe?

The BB theory does not start at the beginning of universee in toatlity. It starts at a theoretcal set of condition's without explaining how the conditions came to be. From that it explains how tne observable universe came to be as wee see it today.

There are people on the forum more knowledgeable on cosmology, you can start a thread on science.

I reject gods and cretionism as implausible. A universe that just is makes sense tom e.

You're not thinking critically enough.

 

[steve_bank]

Another run of the mill theist. Yawn.

You use the term dynamic systems which I worked with for 30 years. Let me known when yu can talk science. Instead of the usual god babble.

 

[godincarnate.me]

The leading Multiverse hypothesis is laughable. It states that the bulk (the eternally inflating false-vacuum regions) expands much faster than the individual bubble universes inside it. OK…

 

[steve_bank]

'Laugh clown laugh' Canio ....

 

[godincarnate.me]

'Laugh clown laugh' Canio ....

The show must go on

 

[steve_bank]

'Laugh clown laugh' Canio ....

The show must go on

So, you are an opera fan?