Saving America by Saving the Family - The Heritage Foundation's New plan For Women

[ZiprHead]

Saving America by Saving the Family

www.heritage.org

A bullet point version can be found here. It basically consists of punishing unwed mothers.

 

[Gospel]

It’s funny how they assume the problem is that people drifted away from a 1950s family model, instead of considering that maybe people actively rejected it. You can’t policy-bribe people back into a social order they don’t actually want. And it’s also ironic that the era they idealize economically was one where the U.S. faced little global competition because much of the world was rebuilding. That context doesn’t exist anymore. Yet they strongly believe that waving Christ on popsicle sticks around will make the rest of the world put aside its own interests just to help revive their “American Dream.”

 

[scombrid]

Funny how much these liberty loving assholes emulate the Romans that were tacking up the zealots that were opposing them. Can’t have liberty without submitting to the authoritarian government.

 

[pood]

So what, according to this stupid essay, is the first main problem? LBJ’s War on Poverty! Yes, we need more poverty.

And marriage must be between one man and one woman, at an early age, to churn out lots of kids!

Anyone with half a brain knows what the subtext of this nonsense is: white people need to make lots of white kids or they will get replaced by brown people, oh, no!

 

[Jarhyn]

So what, according to this stupid essay, is the first main problem? LBJ’s War on Poverty! Yes, we need more poverty.

And marriage must be between one man and one woman, at an early age, to churn out lots of kids!

Anyone with half a brain knows what the subtext of this nonsense is: white people need to make lots of white kids or they will get replaced by brown people, oh, no!

"Fear brown people. Enslave yourself to the wheel of reproduction before your efforts have any chance of elevating you or your community above enslavement in the mud."

 

[ideologyhunter]

I can only assume they want the minimum wage to be tripled, so that these families they're going on about can actually in time afford a house, a car, and some modest accessories and pleasures? High top shoes for the kids, anyway?

 

[Tigers!]

A lot of children are living in poverty and with dysfunctional family structures.

Anything that might allieviate that should be considered even if not fond of the messenger.

 

[Playball40]

A lot of children are living in poverty and with dysfunctional family structures.

Anything that might allieviate that should be considered even if not fond of the messenger.

Except this won't! If you want to mitigate the problem of childhood poverty, re-instate the social safety net, make birth control and abortion available, improve educations systems. THAT will help with your 'childhood poverty' issue. Not punishing families (whatever their structure).

 

[Elixir]

You can’t policy-bribe people back into a social order they don’t actually want.

'Cept for trumpsuckers. Stephen Miller can just tell them what they want (using Trump's rectum-mouth) and they'll want it, obedient MAGAts that they are.

A lot of children are living in poverty and with dysfunctional family structures.

Anything that might allieviate that should be considered even if not fond of the messenger.

Except this won't! If you want to mitigate the problem of childhood poverty, re-instate the social safety net, make birth control and abortion available, improve educations systems. THAT will help with your 'childhood poverty' issue. Not punishing families (whatever their structure).

But those are not consilient with the TrumpJesus religion. TrumpJesus says destroy anything that threatens TrumpJesus and punish those who hesitate to go along with it, and whatever is left will NOT be children living in poverty with dysfunctional family structures.
So beautifully simple! Like ending 8 wars.-

 

[Jarhyn]

A lot of children are living in poverty and with dysfunctional family structures.

Anything that might allieviate that should be considered even if not fond of the messenger.

They are living in poverty with family structures that only are dysfunctional due to a lack of social support and interest.

We shouldn't "consider anything", for the same reason we shouldn't consider just abducting such children and their mothers and grinding them into hamburgers. Clearly that's under the banner of "anything" but we clearly shouldn't even once "consider" it, but reject it wholeheartedly and immediately.

You propose a mind so open that the brain falls out.

These policies are for generating poverty and wage slavery, as much as they are for enslaving women unto broodmare-dom and transparently so... And for no reason than to maintain artificial scarcity and poverty

 

[bilby]

In a happy family, the parents almost always remain married to each other.

Therefore forcing parents to remain married to each other will make families happy.

QED.

(I really hope that I don't need to point out the logical fallacies inherent in the above, or mention that it is a satirical comment and not a serious argument).

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

A lot of children are living in poverty and with dysfunctional family structures.

Anything that might allieviate that should be considered even if not fond of the messenger.

Children growing up with an abusive parent would be considered a dysfunctional family.

 

[Tigers!]

A lot of children are living in poverty and with dysfunctional family structures.

Anything that might allieviate that should be considered even if not fond of the messenger.

Children growing up with an abusive parent would be considered a dysfunctional family.

Indeed.
That is such a huge problem with no easy or quick solutions in sight.

 

[Patooka]

A lot of children are living in poverty and with dysfunctional family structures.

Anything that might allieviate that should be considered even if not fond of the messenger.

Children growing up with an abusive parent would be considered a dysfunctional family.

Indeed.
That is such a huge problem with no easy or quick solutions in sight.

"Under the carpet" though, yeah?

Ask me why that philosophy doesn't always work...

 

[Tigers!]

A lot of children are living in poverty and with dysfunctional family structures.

Anything that might allieviate that should be considered even if not fond of the messenger.

Children growing up with an abusive parent would be considered a dysfunctional family.

Indeed.
That is such a huge problem with no easy or quick solutions in sight.

"Under the carpet" though, yeah?

Ask me why that philosophy doesn't always work...

I do not seem to find where I mentioned "under the carpet"

 

[Patooka]

Agreed.

It's the normal solution though.

 

[TV and credit cards]

It seems to me in Heritage World, we'd strongly disadvantage people who did not get married and did not have children. Is that their shtik? Probably. I'm too old to waste too much time on these people.

But since I'm here, in Heritage World I think...
laws wouldn't be specifically written to disadvantages the childless and unwed but would be structured to ultimately do so. Women, once wed, would have to change their last name to their husband's, completely dropping their maiden name. No hyphenation. It's what the people want according to the latest Rasmussen/Trafalgar poll. Besides, hyphenated last names do not fit on the back of sport jerseys well and we must have equal access to sports for all, both male and female.
Then the good work of making it damn near impossible for our womenfolk to register to vote or obtain a passport due to conflict with their birth certificate would start in earnest. For now, we'll let the states and their access to federal funds handle the issue of voter registration as they see fit. Travel outside the country would be permitted only with an immediate family member passport holder who would be responsible for the safe return of the blessed womb.
Then as artificial intelligence displaces millions of workers, government would coincidentally make setting up child care facilities so onerous so as to make them as rare as abortion facilities are today. This will keep the homemaker where they belongs and the bread winner where they belongs. See what I did there?
Then lets make America safe again and Cover Up America! Much good work can be done through OSHA and the FDA by protecting American citizens from dangerous clothing and cosmetics. Melanoma is a real concern and the jury is still out on these so called sunscreens. And what is SPF anyways? Nothing more than a racist term, that's what. Although at the same time, we must admit, it is undeniable that people of different skin tones are susceptible to melanoma at different rates. It's a scientific fact and we do not run away from science. With this in mind, consideration can be given to skin tone for employment with regards to indoor and outdoor work environments. Now, don't go reading too much into that. It's all about equal access to safety.

 

[GenesisNemesis]

A lot of children are living in poverty and with dysfunctional family structures.

Anything that might allieviate that should be considered even if not fond of the messenger.

We've gone from "Project 2025 isn't real" to "well it might actually help stuff".

 

[Jarhyn]

But since I'm here, in Heritage World I think...
laws wouldn't be specifically written to disadvantages the childless and unwed but would be structured to ultimately do so

The idea in some ways is to prevent the "breakout wealth" of gays/childless from ever appearing and this elevating the families around them.

ONE life lived without kids means instead of one more person in the same poverty as their parents, we have one family with at least one kid that can build something and "drop it" into someone else's lap (often a direct sibling's but sometimes an unrelated party).

Then, once there are more resources in the family group, it becomes less burdensome to have the same number of kids, as the "margin" required for building wealth while still having kids has been exceeded.

Not having children, among siblings who will, is the #1 way you can improve your family's wealth.

I NEVER would have been able to start a company if my husband and I had kids.

That's quite the point: prevent "upstarts".

 

[ZiprHead]

From the superior people who brought us Project 2025...

Ali Velshi did an exposȇ on this subject. Basically the plan is to use the stick to make women stay in their homes instead of the carrot. Make child day care hard to get. Eliminate no fault divorce. Discourage women from taking male courses (STEM fields). Back to barefoot and pregnant.



I hate these people so much.