• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Yet another war, this time with Iran

The mission is now to "bomb them back to the Stone Age, where they belong." Which sounds awful war crimey to me, in the classic Putin sense. They didn't have desalinization and central heating in the Stone Age, so what level of misery does the Sadist in Chief think is proper for the Iranians?
Can the ICJ at least charge him with excursion crimes?
 
The mission is now to "bomb them back to the Stone Age, where they belong." Which sounds awful war crimey to me, in the classic Putin sense. They didn't have desalinization and central heating in the Stone Age, so what level of misery does the Sadist in Chief think is proper for the Iranians?
Can the ICJ at least charge him with excursion crimes?
Our mission is near complete except the Stone Age part. Running water, electricity, wastewater treatment, trade ports, paved roads, buildings... we've got a ways to go it seems.
 
The mission is now to "bomb them back to the Stone Age, where they belong." Which sounds awful war crimey to me, in the classic Putin Kiev Regime sense. They didn't have desalinization and central heating in the Stone Age, so what level of misery does the Sadist in Chief think is proper for the Iranians?
Can the ICJ at least charge him with excursion crimes?
I understand it was not reported by MSM to you, but the first thing Kiev regime did when Crimeans voted to leave "Ukraine" was to cut water supply to them.
 
The mission is now to "bomb them back to the Stone Age, where they belong." Which sounds awful war crimey to me, in the classic Putin Kiev Regime sense. They didn't have desalinization and central heating in the Stone Age, so what level of misery does the Sadist in Chief think is proper for the Iranians?
Can the ICJ at least charge him with excursion crimes?
I understand it was not reported by MSM to you, but the first thing Kiev regime did when Crimeans voted to leave "Ukraine" was to cut water supply to them.
Why would Russia need Ukraine to supply water to Russia?
 
The mission is now to "bomb them back to the Stone Age, where they belong." Which sounds awful war crimey to me, in the classic Putin Kiev Regime sense. They didn't have desalinization and central heating in the Stone Age, so what level of misery does the Sadist in Chief think is proper for the Iranians?
Can the ICJ at least charge him with excursion crimes?
I understand it was not reported by MSM to you, but the first thing Kiev regime did when Crimeans voted to leave "Ukraine" was to cut water supply to them.
Why would Russia need Ukraine to supply water to Russia?
We don't anymore, but at the time water supply was from Ukraine and nazi regime Obama installed in Kiev cut water and electricity immediately.
 
The mission is now to "bomb them back to the Stone Age, where they belong." Which sounds awful war crimey to me, in the classic Putin Kiev Regime sense. They didn't have desalinization and central heating in the Stone Age, so what level of misery does the Sadist in Chief think is proper for the Iranians?
Can the ICJ at least charge him with excursion crimes?
I understand it was not reported by MSM to you, but the first thing Kiev regime did when Crimeans voted to leave "Ukraine" was to cut water supply to them.
Why would Russia need Ukraine to supply water to Russia?
We don't anymore, but at the time water supply was from Ukraine and nazi regime Obama installed in Kiev cut water and electricity immediately.
Someone takes my house, you expect me to pay the utility bills still?
 
The mission is now to "bomb them back to the Stone Age, where they belong." Which sounds awful war crimey to me, in the classic Putin Kiev Regime sense. They didn't have desalinization and central heating in the Stone Age, so what level of misery does the Sadist in Chief think is proper for the Iranians?
Can the ICJ at least charge him with excursion crimes?
I understand it was not reported by MSM to you, but the first thing Kiev regime did when Crimeans voted to leave "Ukraine" was to cut water supply to them.
Why would Russia need Ukraine to supply water to Russia?
We don't anymore, but at the time water supply was from Ukraine and nazi regime Obama installed in Kiev cut water and electricity immediately.
Someone takes my house, you expect me to pay the utility bills still?
The house was not theirs and crimeans were paying their bills just fine, It's just Nazi Regime in Kiev wanted to punish them for voting to leave.
 
The mission is now to "bomb them back to the Stone Age, where they belong." Which sounds awful war crimey to me, in the classic Putin Kiev Regime sense. They didn't have desalinization and central heating in the Stone Age, so what level of misery does the Sadist in Chief think is proper for the Iranians?
Can the ICJ at least charge him with excursion crimes?
I understand it was not reported by MSM to you, but the first thing Kiev regime did when Crimeans voted to leave "Ukraine" was to cut water supply to them.
Why would Russia need Ukraine to supply water to Russia?
We don't anymore, but at the time water supply was from Ukraine and nazi regime Obama installed in Kiev cut water and electricity immediately.
Someone takes my house, you expect me to pay the utility bills still?
The house was not theirs and crimeans were paying their bills just fine, It's just Nazi Regime in Kiev wanted to punish them for voting to leave.
So you are just complaining about a country not supplying utilities to another country. What monsters!
 
The mission is now to "bomb them back to the Stone Age, where they belong." Which sounds awful war crimey to me, in the classic Putin Kiev Regime sense. They didn't have desalinization and central heating in the Stone Age, so what level of misery does the Sadist in Chief think is proper for the Iranians?
Can the ICJ at least charge him with excursion crimes?
I understand it was not reported by MSM to you, but the first thing Kiev regime did when Crimeans voted to leave "Ukraine" was to cut water supply to them.
Why would Russia need Ukraine to supply water to Russia?
We don't anymore, but at the time water supply was from Ukraine and nazi regime Obama installed in Kiev cut water and electricity immediately.
Someone takes my house, you expect me to pay the utility bills still?
The house was not theirs and crimeans were paying their bills just fine, It's just Nazi Regime in Kiev wanted to punish them for voting to leave.
So you are just complaining about a country not supplying utilities to another country. What monsters!
No, I am talking about one country actively cutting water channel, basically a river just to punish them for refusing to bow down to their nazi government.
 
Trump went on TV to say nothing new?

Ya. He goes on TV and just says the same old crap that Iran then denies. Markets were expecting something new. Nothing new. No credible exit plan and no credible news on opening the strait. So markets go down.

Trump is such a fool.

Trump just keeps yelling at our perhaps former allies to open the strait militarily but it's next to impossible. Trump should know that. But reality never has anything to do with what Trump says or does.
 
The way the war is going dems should win but what's the point if they can't get enough votes to send orange shit and his war criminals/insider traders to prison?
The Dems can manage to fuck up even the easiest opportunities. They lost unions to a party that openly hates unions. They annoyed every demographic so much that it put Trump in office twice by failing to disavow and give voice to radical nincompoops. They're very creative in their ability to lose what should otherwise be easy wins.
 
Ya. He goes on TV and just says the same old crap that Iran then denies. Markets were expecting something new.
There's a clear pattern. Hint at big news to boost the markets on trading days; Pull the rug out from under those hints when the markets are closed. It's a long weekend on Wall Street, a perfect time to disappoint.

This grifting mobster is playing pump-and-dump with the entire world economy, and using the US military to ensure that markets move the way he wants. It's probably the biggest scam in history, and he's not even trying to hide it.

Commentators are all "We can't understand Trump's strategic goals in attacking Iran; What's in it for the USA?", when the whole thing makes perfect sense if you assume that the USA doesn't matter to Trump at all, and the entire strategy is aimed at enriching Trump, his family, and his gang of criminal accomplices.

The press are so used to the assumption that the US President has the interests of the USA in mind that they can't bear to consider that he might simply not give a hoot about that country.

Ask not what you can do for your country, nor even what your country can do for you; Ask instead how you personally can become wealthier and more powerful, and if that fucks up your country, or requires piles of corpses, who cares?

This same strategy was employed during COVID.
 
Trump bragging about taking out a bridge in Iran. Or at least severing, the bridge appears to be still standing, otherwise, at least for now. A bridge hasn't been used as an offensive weapon since the Battle of Stirling Bridge... as documented in the historically accurate movie Braveheart, where said missing bridge from battle scene was presumably flung towards the British troops.

So we are now bombarding civil infrastructure in Iran. Fuck! Though maybe the word bombard is too strong. The damage seemed a bit minor for a US military attack.
 
Ya. He goes on TV and just says the same old crap that Iran then denies. Markets were expecting something new.
There's a clear pattern. Hint at big news to boost the markets on trading days; Pull the rug out from under those hints when the markets are closed. It's a long weekend on Wall Street, a perfect time to disappoint.

This grifting mobster is playing pump-and-dump with the entire world economy, and using the US military to ensure that markets move the way he wants. It's probably the biggest scam in history, and he's not even trying to hide it.

Commentators are all "We can't understand Trump's strategic goals in attacking Iran; What's in it for the USA?", when the whole thing makes perfect sense if you assume that the USA doesn't matter to Trump at all, and the entire strategy is aimed at enriching Trump, his family, and his gang of criminal accomplices.
Might be giving this sack of assholes too much credit. These people aren't well mentally and they sure the heck aren't competent. While Trump has been able to make with the grift over the years, these plans came from others, not him. He was never smart enough to dig out from his repeated business failures.

People around him might be taking advantage, but Trump is too much of an idiot to do it for himself. He lets others grift for him.
 
Trump bragging about taking out a bridge in Iran. Or at least severing, the bridge appears to be still standing, otherwise, at least for now. A bridge hasn't been used as an offensive weapon since the Battle of Stirling Bridge... as documented in the historically accurate movie Braveheart, where said missing bridge from battle scene was presumably flung towards the British troops.

So we are now bombarding civil infrastructure in Iran. Fuck! Though maybe the word bombard is too strong. The damage seemed a bit minor for a US military attack.

Trump and Hagsbreath love to violate international law just for the loud booms of it. They think that real men love blowing things up. Trump especially loves to destroy things whether it's a bridge or a boat or health care or international alliances. Destroy destroy destroy.
 
The way the war is going dems should win but what's the point if they can't get enough votes to send orange shit and his war criminals/insider traders to prison?
The Dems can manage to fuck up even the easiest opportunities. They lost unions to a party that openly hates unions. They annoyed every demographic so much that it put Trump in office twice by failing to disavow and give voice to radical nincompoops. They're very creative in their ability to lose what should otherwise be easy wins.
Radical nincompoops? The GOP embraced Alex Jones, RFK Jr., etc… GOP is passing chemtrail and UFO bills. But the Democrats chased voters away just by failing to disavow “radical nincompoops”.

What’s a radical lefty? Liz Warren?
 
I don't understand why everyone keeps talking about "war crimes" as though they are a bad thing. They are a bad thing to liberals, not to the MAGA movement. Accusing Trump of committing war crimes is just paying him a compliment from his perspective.
 
Back
Top Bottom