The bit in brackets says that you don't know what "independent country" means.
Similarly presence of atom bombs in Iran or missiles in Cuba do not matter unless they attack. Why is Trump after Cuba?
No, I actually know what "independent country" means. EU/NATO countries are not independent, they are to a large degree dependent on US.
The global economy has made the world dependent on the world.
That goes without saying. But I was talking about the fact that führers of "independent" EU "countries are not really elected in free elections but assigned by mostly american capital.
Ukraine knew Russia had hostile intentions. Anticipating war doesn't mean wanting war.
Reading between the lines is a real thing--you can often discern things by what is not said.
It's mostly garbage these days. Clickbait and AI hallucination. (The AI stuff usually ends up saying the opposite of it's headline.)
Yeah, that's how to go down the rabbit hole. More informative is to look at the apparently-credible articles that appear to disagree, see if they have anything to them.Bold: This seems backwards to me. I'd like to think objective news shapes my views. By filtering you seem to indicate you discard what does not fit with yours.No national daily in India has Russian propaganda. They are as independent as myself. Furthermore, I said "I filter the news." I take the understanding of the news according to my view.
I do not read any tabloids. And as for the channels, I know which channel inclines towards what views.
On the whole, I am a Modi follower. Nationalist Right.
.
For many decades there has been an awful lot more claiming than doing.
Wikipedia is not remotely a reliable source on hot-button issues such as this. It ends up being a vote as to what's true. While I have never seen truly false statements I have seen major cherry-picking and reliance on sources that lack credibility. (The standard unethical journalist dodge: X said that Y said Z. Or did instead of said. Unless the X said is the focus figure that means they don't have evidence of the core claim.)Netanyahu a Zionist said it on camera. Jews have a god given right to the land that was Israel 2000 years ago and can do what they will with it.
Casualties of the Gaza war - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Unaware why they think like they do?
Somewhat, but note that the attack that keeps being cited was an attack on British military HQ. Clearly a legitimate target. If that's their best example of wrong then I don't think there was that much wrong.
Egypt blockaded Israeli ports.
I don't think The Felon has the slightest notion of how to force Iran into submission.
Neither Ukraine nor Gaza has a heavy industrial base, they are being armed from outside. You can't beat such an opponent.
You are unbearable. Arestovich is on record saying "War with Russia might be the price for EU membership"
I'm thinking of things like the supposed famine.
I do not think Russia had any such intention before removal of Yuschenko. NATO knew that, and that is why they created unrest in Ukraine.
Again, I do not think so.
That is not my experience. DuckAssist and GPT-5 give me just the information that I need. I am happy with them. I never register for GPT, registration is necessary for Duckduckgo. Tor is a bit beyond my range. I do not need that kind of security.
Whether the articles agree or differ, it is still your decision to accept a view. If one depends only on disagreeing articles, that is succumbing to propaganda.
That is not citing JH (or anyone for that matter) posting about a famine - supposed or actual.
Ah yes, where is the quote?
Not that it is important but you keep confusing Yuschenko with Yanukovych.
Whether the articles agree or differ, it is still your decision to accept a view. If one depends only on disagreeing articles, that is succumbing to propaganda.
Sorry, I stand corrected.
