Yes, when talking about medical issues, medical lingo is irrelevant.
Do you think that the people trying to trash women's reproductive rights are discussing medical issues? That they generally understand them?
Tom
I think that they deliberately choose language to inflame emotions and count on emotions to override thinking.
We hear a lot about fetal heartbeats: if a fetal heartbeat can be heard then in some states, no abortion can happen, even if the woman’s life depends upon terminating the pregnancy. Even if conditions exist that make it impossible to carry the pregnancy to viability.
Here’s the thing: It is possible to take a fertilized chicken egg and open it and to take a few of those fetal chick cells and culture them in appropriate medium Abd if everything goes well, that clump of cells will begin to have a ‘heart beat.’ It can never grow into a chick, even if some perfect artificial egg/incubator to receive those cells existed.
It’s easy enough that in fact, I’ve done it as an undergrad.
So the heartbeat test is just to play on emotions and override thinking or understanding information.
Abortion is a red meat issue for conservatives. It invoked in people’s minds the image of a sweet, dimpled little baby, so precious! What a horrible thing to even think about ending that baby’s life!
Never mind that if you let the mother die you lose the baby as well.
But that red meat issue allows politicians to gin up a lot of emotion, primarily fear of allowing other people freedom. Freedom to make choices that you don’t think k you’d make in that woman’s ( or child’s) place. How could they! How evil!