• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

How should west respond to Russian invasion of Ukraine?

No, because I am consistent.
How is you consistent when you are doing nothing but justifying western aggression against Russia?

It is your country that is invading Ukraine. It is your side that threatens nuclear war almost every day (China has said no to your side about this by the way). It is your side that threatens the Baltics and Poland almost every day. It is your side that denies a truce and realistic peace terms. It is your side that yesterday threatened to attack western peacekeepers willing to go Ukraine after a peace agreement is reached. It is your side that threatens, bully's, and invades other countries. And you are surprised that other countries band together to protect themselves against your side?
 
And you are surprised that other countries band together to protect themselves against your side?
I am not surprised, because this is not what is happening.
In fact the opposite is happening. Countries are siding with Russia.

Oh wow. However, I forgot for a moment that you live in Siberia and have little access to world events and news. Relying on news from Scott Ritter and Steven Seagal isn't doing you any favors!
 
Speaking of terrorists. Ukraine's "Defense" minister who was credited with the latest highly successful drone campaign against Russia was ...... fired.
Do you know why?
 
And you are surprised that other countries band together to protect themselves against your side?
I am not surprised, because this is not what is happening.
In fact the opposite is happening. Countries are siding with Russia.

Oh wow. However, I forgot for a moment that you live in Siberia and have little access to world events and news. Relying on news from Scott Ritter and Steven Seagal isn't doing you any favors!
And your source of information is Lindsey Graham rectum. Sorry for your loss.
 
Have been watching interview of Julia Latynina by Panchenko.
Panchenko said that the reason for deleting her channel was her video about Elensky attempts to build (comedy) career in Moscow. That's pretty revealing.
Not the fact that Elensky loved Russia and Moscow so mush but the fact that he wants to hide it so much.
I have no idea what that even means.
 
Never, not once, have either you, barbos or even Putin provided a shred of evidence towards this. And if you believe Ukraine doesn't "count", then your previous statement;
Both the USA and Russia have such a long and ignoble history of doing that at this point someone would have to produce strong evidence against super powers meddling before I would believe.
Tom
 
I have no idea what that even means.
It means babs, lacking any cogent argument for Putin’s insane destruction of the Russian economy, is reduced (elevated?) to incoherent rants against Ukraine, its leader and all the rational people who point and laugh at Russian stupidity.
I can only offer, as consolation, the fact that America is led by an equally deluded, and even greedier, stupider and less informed thug than their own greedy little narcissist.
 
Countries are siding with Russia.
I don't know why I'm wasting my time with this but I guess I hate myself:




Resolution ES 11/4. was 143 for, 5 against. And support for Russia has decreased since.

So not only barbos can't read a map, numbers are difficult too. But he still has sex offender Scott Ritter on his side, so I guess that's something?
 
Never, not once, have either you, barbos or even Putin provided a shred of evidence towards this. And if you believe Ukraine doesn't "count", then your previous statement;
Both the USA and Russia have such a long and ignoble history of doing that at this point someone would have to produce strong evidence against super powers meddling before I would believe.
Tom
I'm not saying you're wrong. I'm saying an unintended consequence of such an attitude gives dictators like Putin legitimacy for their actions.
 
You claim Russia was provoked, the CIA did something in Ukraine and when asked for clarification you one and only answer is "I believe it to be true purely on faith"

That is the weakest, most pathetic argument I've heard about this entire conflict and I'm including bought and paid for shills like Teent Media and convicted pedophiles like Scott Ritter.
I don't have the information, that is why I did not respond to it, rather than coming up with something false.
 
You claim Russia was provoked, the CIA did something in Ukraine and when asked for clarification you one and only answer is "I believe it to be true purely on faith"

That is the weakest, most pathetic argument I've heard about this entire conflict and I'm including bought and paid for shills like Teent Media and convicted pedophiles like Scott Ritter.
I don't have the information, that is why I did not respond to it, rather than coming up with something false.
You do realise you're sounding exactly like the people who thought the moon landings were fake, or that 9/11 was an inside job, right? You can't even explain how you came to your conclusion. So why don't you believe in unicorns then?
 
Speaking of terrorists. Ukraine's "Defense" minister who was credited with the latest highly successful drone campaign against Russia was ...... fired.
Do you know why?
No. Have you heard anything?
Would you believe Bagdad Barbos if he made a claim on the subject?
Tom
This is the best I've got so far from Kyiv Post:
Fedorov himself appeared before reporters wearing his trademark plain T-shirt and delivered an unusually frank press conference.

He confirmed that his dismissal stemmed from his attempts to reform the defense ministry and from his conflict with the General Staff and Syrsky.

“It took us four months to approve a project to supply brigades with drones because of bureaucratic infighting. For six months, we couldn’t change the structure of the Ministry of Defense because the General Staff refused to approve it. They kept saying this wasn’t written correctly, that wasn’t written correctly. In six months, we barely managed to transfer a handful of people into the ministry.”

According to Fedorov, he eventually approached Zelensky with what he believed was the only viable solution: replacing senior military commanders whom he accused of effectively sabotaging reforms:

“I never said “either me or Syrsky.’ Zelensky refused to dismiss him. Fine. I was prepared to continue working with the commander-in-chief. But after that, all of our initiatives began to be blocked. Syrsky is not prepared to speak openly about the problems. Then he issued an ultimatum. Instead of thinking about how to defeat Russia, he figured out how to divide the country.”
Considering the accomplishments of Fedorov's drone campaign so far, I would like a statement from Zelensky as to why he went with the old military guard.
 
Back
Top Bottom