Climate Change(d)?

[DBT]

Obviously you do care because you keep defending your religion.

Is that a ''Hee/Haw?''

Is what a “Hee/Haw”? What are you on about?

It is climate Denialism that goes against the evidence, which makes it a matter of faith, a religion.

Gibberish.

You lost your argument when you acknowledged storms are created by the mixing of warm and cold air. Intensity is driven by the temperature difference.

It simply follows that global ciimate is affected by warmer oceans.

You only have to look at the El Nino and La Ninia cycles driven by small chages in ocean textures.

What part of “climate is variable” are you not grasping?

Inputs make it variable. Our industrial scale input is having an effect.

There is zero evidence to support your assertion.

It's your beliefs that creates a block, you are not willing to acknowledge or consider the evidence that is there for all to see.

 

[southernhybrid]

You’ve had five years on this thread to produce evidence. All you produce are dumb comments and personal attacks.

There is no “climate crisis” caused by humans. The planet is not on fire and the oceans are not boiling.

It’s a religion for you. A rapture like cult.

And you keep saying you're going to leave this thread, but never do. None of your responses have been intelligent. None of your denialism has explained anything. All. you do is insult the others here, by calling people members of a rapture like religious cult. Yet, you have had the nerve to complain that others have insulted you! Seriously? Please go away since you're not interested in learning about climate science. If you don't go, at least try to respond with an intelligent answer because eye rolls and calling people members of a cult aren't intelligent responses.

 

[TSwizzle]

Obviously you do care because you keep defending your religion.

Is that a ''Hee/Haw?''

Is what a “Hee/Haw”? What are you on about?

It is climate Denialism that goes against the evidence, which makes it a matter of faith, a religion.

Gibberish.

You lost your argument when you acknowledged storms are created by the mixing of warm and cold air. Intensity is driven by the temperature difference.

It simply follows that global ciimate is affected by warmer oceans.

You only have to look at the El Nino and La Ninia cycles driven by small chages in ocean textures.

What part of “climate is variable” are you not grasping?

Inputs make it variable. Our industrial scale input is having an effect.

There is zero evidence to support your assertion.

It's your beliefs that creates a block, you are not willing to acknowledge or consider the evidence that is there for all to see.

Not true.

 

[TSwizzle]

You’ve had five years on this thread to produce evidence. All you produce are dumb comments and personal attacks.

There is no “climate crisis” caused by humans. The planet is not on fire and the oceans are not boiling.

It’s a religion for you. A rapture like cult.

And you keep saying you're going to leave this thread, but never do. None of your responses have been intelligent. None of your denialism has explained anything. All. you do is insult the others here, by calling people members of a rapture like religious cult. Yet, you have had the nerve to complain that others have insulted you! Seriously? Please go away since you're not interested in learning about climate science. If you don't go, at least try to respond with an intelligent answer because eye rolls and calling people members of a cult aren't intelligent responses.

You consistently post climate catastrophe porn and call on me as the "denialist", and you are complaining I respond to it?

Don't engage with me if you don't want me to respond.

And that goes for all of you.

BTW, it is a catastrophic 73f today.

 

[DBT]

It's a discussion forum, where members can respond as they see fit.

 

[DBT]

Obviously you do care because you keep defending your religion.

Is that a ''Hee/Haw?''

Is what a “Hee/Haw”? What are you on about?

It is climate Denialism that goes against the evidence, which makes it a matter of faith, a religion.

Gibberish.

You lost your argument when you acknowledged storms are created by the mixing of warm and cold air. Intensity is driven by the temperature difference.

It simply follows that global ciimate is affected by warmer oceans.

You only have to look at the El Nino and La Ninia cycles driven by small chages in ocean textures.

What part of “climate is variable” are you not grasping?

Inputs make it variable. Our industrial scale input is having an effect.

There is zero evidence to support your assertion.

It's your beliefs that creates a block, you are not willing to acknowledge or consider the evidence that is there for all to see.

Not true.

So you say.

 

[TSwizzle]

Obviously you do care because you keep defending your religion.

Is that a ''Hee/Haw?''

Is what a “Hee/Haw”? What are you on about?

It is climate Denialism that goes against the evidence, which makes it a matter of faith, a religion.

Gibberish.

You lost your argument when you acknowledged storms are created by the mixing of warm and cold air. Intensity is driven by the temperature difference.

It simply follows that global ciimate is affected by warmer oceans.

You only have to look at the El Nino and La Ninia cycles driven by small chages in ocean textures.

What part of “climate is variable” are you not grasping?

Inputs make it variable. Our industrial scale input is having an effect.

There is zero evidence to support your assertion.

It's your beliefs that creates a block, you are not willing to acknowledge or consider the evidence that is there for all to see.

Not true.

So you say.

Yes, yes I do say.

 

[Elixir]

Yes, yes I do say.

You say SO MANY untrue things though.
Are we to think you’re joking? Or that you ARE the joke?
Intended or not, I suspect the latter.

 

[TSwizzle]

Climate change over the next 20 years could result in a global catastrophe costing millions of lives in wars and natural disasters.. A secret report, suppressed by US defence chiefs and obtained by The Observer, warns that major European cities will be sunk beneath rising seas as Britain is plunged into a ‘Siberian’ climate. The document predicts that abrupt climate change could bring the planet to the edge of anarchy as countries develop a nuclear threat to defend and secure dwindling food, water and energy supplies. The threat to global stability vastly eclipses that of terrorism, say the few experts privy to its contents. Climate change ‘should be elevated beyond a scientific debate to a US national security concern’, say the authors, Peter Schwartz, CIA consultant and former head of planning at Royal Dutch/Shell Group, and Doug Randall of the California-based Global Business Network. An imminent scenario of catastrophic climate change is ‘plausible and would challenge United States national security in ways that should be considered immediately’, they conclude. As early as next year widespread flooding by a rise in sea levels will create major upheaval for millions. Senior climatologists, however, believe that their verdicts could prove the catalyst in forcing Bush to accept climate change as a real and happening phenomenon. They also hope it will convince the United States to sign up to global treaties to reduce the rate of climatic change. Bob Watson, chief scientist for the World Bank and former chair of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, added that the Pentagon’s dire warnings could no longer be ignored. Symons, who left the EPA in protest at political interference, said that the suppression of the report was a further instance of the White House trying to bury evidence of climate change. ‘It is yet another example of why this government should stop burying its head in the sand on this issue.’ ‘This administration is ignoring the evidence in order to placate a handful of large energy and oil companies,’ he added.

Teh Grauniad

Climate change over the next 20 years could result in a global catastrophe
Abrupt climate change
Next year widespread flooding
imminent catastrophic climate change
Ignoring the evidence
etc. etc. etc.

lol, this piece of nonsense was published in February 2004. Twenty two years ago, almost twenty three years ago.

It really is a rapture like cult.

 

[Elixir]

“A secret report, suppressed by US defence chiefs and obtained by The Observer, warns that major European cities will be sunk beneath rising seas as Britain is plunged into a ‘Siberian’ climate.”
0000ooooh Noooes!

-Teh Gruaniad

You’re an Effin’ riot Swiz.
Allergic to primary sources and eager to gobble up ignorant populist pap.

 

[Loren Pechtel]

https://scienceinsights.org/why-do-people-deny-climate-change-psychology-explained/

People deny climate change not because they lack access to scientific evidence, but because accepting it conflicts with their identity, values, and sense of security. The scientific consensus is overwhelming: 97 percent of actively publishing climate scientists agree that humans are causing global warming. Yet significant portions of the public reject or downplay this reality. The reasons are psychological, political, economic, and sometimes deliberately manufactured.

The Brain’s Defense Against Uncomfortable Facts​

When a piece of information threatens something you believe about yourself or the world, your brain doesn’t process it neutrally. It triggers cognitive dissonance, the uncomfortable tension that arises when new facts clash with existing beliefs. Brain regions involved in conflict detection and emotional distress light up, creating a strong urge to resolve the tension. And the easiest way to resolve it isn’t to change your worldview. It’s to dismiss the information.

Doesn't even have to be in disagreement with prior knowledge, just the unpleasant reality gets rejected.

Especially when a skilled manipulator pretends there's some pie in the sky answer and they can reject the unpleasant reality.

 

[Loren Pechtel]

Oh, there he is.

How dare you assume my gender!!

Ok.....there She, He or It is, the forum's climate denialist. Is that better?

No it is not. My pronouns are clearly shown on my profile, bigot.

“Climate denialist” lol, bruh.

So you're agendered or are you a donkey?