Oh please, you know I answer and comment on all of what you and others post. You are the only one who actually replies back to me.
You do answer and you do comment, but neither your answer or your comment involves an actual argument to support your claims.
Just for the sake of interest, here's is someone's argument against indeterminism as a foundation for free will;
Quote;
''Assuming that discussion of free will is necessarily a discussion concerning necessity or contingency is wrong. As Kant said, freedom is neither nature nor chance. Philosophers or scientists who think that indeterminism gives freedom of will forget the rules of classical logic and claim that "(p −−> ¬q) implies (¬p −−> q)", where "p" stands for determinism and "q" stands for freedom of will. This argument is false.
For example, let us imagine building a robot that follows random laws. Is it free? Of course not.
Indeterminism is not an absence of causation but the presence of non−deterministic causal processes (Fetzer 1988).
I mean that "causality" is not necessarily determinism; we can understand "causality" in a more general sense: causality as "explanation" or "reason". An explanation of or the reason for an event means following a law (perhaps a statistical law), and the presence of laws is the absence of free will. Quantum mechanics is indeterministic but it is not acausal. There is always a cause, an explanation or reason, for any phenomenon; for example, when an electron which is pushed towards another electron. Both electrons are repelled, and their positions and velocities are undetermined. The cause of repulsion is that we joint both electrons. The electrons are not free to choose their repulsion''
7. Conclusions
•Indeterminism does not imply free will.
•The opposite of free will is materialism rather than determinism.
•Dualism and "mind collapsing matter" from quantum subjectivism is against observational
evidence in neurology.
•Dualism and "mind collapsing matter" from quantum subjectivism is against evolution theory.
•The contemporary scientific position no more has a place for freedom of will than French materialism of XVIII century''