Amazing.
Countless men get away with rape. A tiny fraction of women make false accusations of rape.
Despite this, you spend a great deal of time complaining about the latter, and no time at all complaining about the former. Is this part of your strategy for the War On Women?
What exactly is your point?
It is a periodic post that is typically due because Derec just can't drop his mistrust of women and continues to harmp on stuff like this all the time. Pretty much just releasing frustration. Derec's earlier presumptions in the thread were debunked and he still rails on.
What mistrust of women?
Are we reading the same posts?
Derec's posts in this thread comes with a terrible amount of baggage called, all of Derec's postings. You may want to check out his posts in The Lounge.
I have read some of his other posts.
I didn't see anything that made me think he distrusts women.
But anyway, Derec's character is hardly relevant to the topic of this tread - which has recently gone completely off the deep end.
This thread went off the deep end in the OP when Derec derailed his own topic:
Columbia absolutely did wrong by giving Mattress Girl class credit to defame her victim and by allowing her, contrary to rules, to drag that mattress to the graduation ceremony. It is very difficult in our legal climate for victims of false rape allegations to get any semblance of justice.
Emma Sulkowicz’s Accused Rapist Had His Lawsuit Against Columbia Dismissed
So according to this judge, Title IX only protects women alleging rape but not men falsely accused of rape. That sexist bullshit, but par for the course in our deeply messed up society.
Assuming the topic was actually supposed to be about Judge Gregory Woods' dismissal of Paul Nungesser's Title IX lawsuit, Derec immediately derailed into his typical rant against women in general and Emma Sulkowicz in particular. He continues beating his hobby horse claim about "false rape allegations" as if this is any sort of widespread problem (especially when compared to the number of unprosecuted rapes), and didn't actually say a single word about the why's or wherefore's of the dismissal itself. Other people
did try to have a rational discussion about the specific legalities of the dismissal, but Derec chose to continue with his hobby horse instead.
And for someone who wants to pompously finger-wag that Derec's character "hardly relevant to the topic of this tread" - take your own damned advice before offering it to people who have zero interest in your *advice*. Here is your very first post in this thread:
The behavior of many in this thread is just more evidence that the political Left places no value whatsoever on individual freedoms, liberties, and justice - the bedrock of enlightenment thinking and true liberalism.
Is it any wonder why Dawkins calls them 'pathetic'? Or Nawaz 'regressive'?
Shameful. Just shameful.
The character of "many in this thread" is "hardly relevant to the topic of this tread"... or in other words - your contributions to this thread are shameful. Just shameful.