• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Here we go again!

From other reports, it was a bomber and he was the only person killed. Story is still developing.
 
It was a 27 year old Syrian.
Germany bombing: Syrian man kills himself, injures 12, in Ansbach explosion

Hermann said the man’s request for asylum was rejected a year ago, but he was allowed to remain in Germany on account of the situation in Syria.
If his asylum application is denied, why the hell is he allowed to stay? Obviously his request was denied for a reason.

And that is not all. We also had this going on: Germany machete attack: Syria migrant kills woman

Police added that the man arrested had been involved in previous incidents where he had caused injury, but gave no further details.

Why the hell wasn't he deported then? Why allow these ticking time bombs to remain in Europe? Are they at least going to deport him now after a long prison sentence (there is no real life in prison in Germany) or is he going to be allowed to remain in Germany after a few years in prison like that wanna-be assassin who stabbed a police woman after they released him from prison?

Merkel's legacy will be allowing millions of so-called "refugees" to come to Germany and cause all sorts of problems.
pS4gqdE.jpg


- - - Updated - - -

Again?

Who did this?

65533219.jpg


Were they a suicide bomber before?
No, suicide bombing is kind of a one shot deal. :tonguea:

And it's going to get much, much worse.
Another 3 million refugees and migrants will arrive in Europe in 2016, EU says
Why doesn't EU do the right thing and practice some real border control together with deporting migrants who have entered Europe illegally instead of doing the opposite and actually helping migrants reach Europe?
Refugees.jpg
 
Last edited:
She's "ruined" an entire continent.

By letting in these sub-human undesirables.

That do things people all over Europe have been doing for a long time.
 
She's "ruined" an entire continent.
By letting in these sub-human undesirables.
Undesirables yes, but I doubt they are all your cousins. :)

What she did is give an open invitation to millions of people (only some of whom are bona fide refugees) to come to Europe generally and Germany specifically. About a million of them came to Germany alone in 2015 alone. And many more millions are waiting in the wings.
They come from cultures fundamentally incompatible with European societies. That does not mean that some individuals are not capable of integrating but when you import a society in bulk you are bound to get bulk properties of those societies as well, including all the dysfunction of these societies that led to the problems they are fleeing from in the first place.
What was needed in the first place was:
- limited amount of people
- thoroughly vetted
- deported if they engage in serious or violent crimes and/or exhibit radical Islamist tendencies.

Instead "Mutti Multikulti" gave us huge, unsustainable numbers or completely unvetted migrants who are not even being deported as needed. The suicide bomber had his asylum denied. Why wasn't he deported? The machete murderer was known to police for previous attacks that led to injuries. Why wasn't he deported? Why were these two and million of other people let in without vetting?

That do things people all over Europe have been doing for a long time.
Europe largely overcame their problems and it has been a rather peaceful, civilized society. But now the Muslim invaders are changing all that.
 
Looks like the Poster Child for those against offering shelter to refugees, I'm sorry, I mean "fakeugees" or "rapugees" or ... you get the point. They get to point and snicker and high-five, see!!! see!!! We told you! They are going to kill us all, each and every one of them.
 
Looks like the Poster Child for those against offering shelter to refugees, I'm sorry, I mean "fakeugees" or "rapugees" or ... you get the point.
Many are not "refugees" by any stretch of that term. Only 20% are from Syria.
Four out of five migrants are NOT from Syria: EU figures expose the 'lie' that the majority of refugees are fleeing war zone

They get to point and snicker and high-five, see!!! see!!! We told you! They are going to kill us all, each and every one of them.
Who said "every one of them"? I have always stressed the need for limits in numbers, vetting, and deportations if needed, not a blanket ban. Both of the Syrian attackers from this thread should have been deported. They were not, and they were able to kill and maim.
4a65a63bbbddf946aa48d66793d02052.jpg
 
Undesirables yes, but I doubt they are all your cousins. :)

What she did is give an open invitation to millions of people (only some of whom are bona fide refugees) to come to Europe generally and Germany specifically. About a million of them came to Germany alone in 2015 alone. And many more millions are waiting in the wings.
They come from cultures fundamentally incompatible with European societies. That does not mean that some individuals are not capable of integrating but when you import a society in bulk you are bound to get bulk properties of those societies as well, including all the dysfunction of these societies that led to the problems they are fleeing from in the first place.
What was needed in the first place was:
- limited amount of people
- thoroughly vetted
- deported if they engage in serious or violent crimes and/or exhibit radical Islamist tendencies.

Instead "Mutti Multikulti" gave us huge, unsustainable numbers or completely unvetted migrants who are not even being deported as needed. The suicide bomber had his asylum denied. Why wasn't he deported? The machete murderer was known to police for previous attacks that led to injuries. Why wasn't he deported? Why were these two and million of other people let in without vetting?

That do things people all over Europe have been doing for a long time.
Europe largely overcame their problems and it has been a rather peaceful, civilized society. But now the Muslim invaders are changing all that.

You're deluded.

There has been violence all through Europe ever since WWII.

New blood invigorates a culture.

If the culture will allow it.
 
You're deluded.
No you are.
There has been violence all through Europe ever since WWII.
There is no society with absolutely no violence. Degrees matter.

New blood invigorates a culture.
Depends on the blood. Some blood carries disease. Some blood will kill you just because it has an incompatible blood type.
europes-sharia-islam-muslim-problem-islamic-terrorism-je-suis-charlie-hebdo-france.jpg

Europe doesn't need this kind of "invigoration".
If the culture will allow it.
How about you host all these "invigorating" Muslim migrants in your house if you love them so much. Of course, you'll have to throw out all the beer and bacon from your fridge (because with Islam, host societies must adapt to migrants, not vice versa), but just imagine how invigorating it will be ...
 
Last edited:
No you are.
There has been violence all through Europe ever since WWII.
There is no society with absolutely no violence. Degrees matter.

New blood invigorates a culture.
Depends on the blood. Some blood carries disease.

If the culture will allow it.
How about you host all these "invigorating" Muslim migrants in your house if you love them so much.

Xenophobia is not an argument.

The EXACT SAME things were said when the Irish came to the US.

By ignoramuses.
 
New blood invigorates a culture.

Yeah, one minute you're getting lazy and set in your ways drinking your beer and eating your sausage, then *bam* axe-murderer, *bam* suicide bomber, *bam* machete attack.

Very invigorating.
 
New blood invigorates a culture.

Yeah, one minute you're getting lazy and set in your ways drinking your beer and eating your sausage, then *bam* axe-murderer, *bam* suicide bomber, *bam* machete attack.

Very invigorating.

It's as likely as being struck by lightning.

But why use the greatest part of cultural exchange, the non-violent part, to describe the process?
 
Xenophobia is not an argument.
This is not xenophobia. In fact, lefties calling all critics of unrestricted mass migration xenophobes is what gives real xenophobes aid and comfort. A far right candidate has a good chance of winning Austrian presidential elections in October (a redo, he narrowly lost the first runoff), largely because the mainstream parties made a colossal cock-up of the migrant crisis.
The EXACT SAME things were said when the Irish came to the US.
Irish wanted to impose Sharia law?
irish-beers.jpg

irisiii.jpg

25903680426_6d63da47f8_c.jpg

By ignoramuses.
It is ignoramuses who equate Irish with Muslims.
 
Irish wanted to impose Sharia law?

It was not the exact same thing.

They said the Irish were different. They were especially violent and dirty, carried disease. Lazy and untrustworthy. Alcoholics and ignorant.

They followed the Pope, not real Christians.

The ignoramuses of the day said this.

It is ignoramuses who equate Irish with Muslims.

What's being equated are the opinions held by some about both groups when they were first immigrating into a new place.
 
Ansbach explosion: Bomber pledged allegiance to IS
BBC said:
The attacker announced in the video "in the name of Allah that he pledged allegiance to [IS chief] Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi... and announced an act of revenge against Germans because they were standing in the way of Islam," Mr Hermann said.[..]Bavarian authorities said that the bomb which exploded in Ansbach was constructed in such a way that it was clearly meant to kill as many people as possible.Further bomb-making equipment was found at the asylum seeker accommodation where the man was living, including a fuel canister, hydrogen peroxide and batteries, they added.
Knock me over with a feather.

P.S.: Why aren't these "asylum seeker accommodations" regularly checked for prohibited items? And his asylum was (rightly) denied. Why was he still living there and not back in Syria?
 
No you are.

There is no society with absolutely no violence. Degrees matter.

New blood invigorates a culture.
Depends on the blood. Some blood carries disease.

If the culture will allow it.
How about you host all these "invigorating" Muslim migrants in your house if you love them so much.

Xenophobia is not an argument.

The EXACT SAME things were said when the Irish came to the US.

By ignoramuses.

Are you unable to see the difference between distantly historical prejudice against foreign culture that existed at that time and the tangible, actual, stated incompatibilities with current immigrant groups that are demanding the laws in their country of origin to apply in our country... laws that set Western Culture back to the Dark Ages of civil rights?

Or is it your opinion that if we get a million new immigrants to say that their religion requires we take voting rights away from women, subject gays to harsh punishment, and put Atheists to death, that we are just being "Xenophobic Ignoramuses"?
If you do, then go suck a bag of muslim dicks.
 
No you are.

There is no society with absolutely no violence. Degrees matter.

New blood invigorates a culture.
Depends on the blood. Some blood carries disease.

If the culture will allow it.
How about you host all these "invigorating" Muslim migrants in your house if you love them so much.

Xenophobia is not an argument.

The EXACT SAME things were said when the Irish came to the US.

By ignoramuses.

Are you unable to see the difference between distantly historical prejudice against foreign culture that existed at that time and the tangible, actual, stated incompatibilities with current immigrant groups that are demanding the laws in their country of origin to apply in our country... laws that set Western Culture back to the Dark Ages of civil rights?

You must be unfamiliar with US history.
 
Are you unable to see the difference between distantly historical prejudice against foreign culture that existed at that time and the tangible, actual, stated incompatibilities with current immigrant groups that are demanding the laws in their country of origin to apply in our country... laws that set Western Culture back to the Dark Ages of civil rights?
You are kind of doing it right now.

Or is it your opinion that if we get a million new immigrants to say that their religion requires we take voting rights away from women, subject gays to harsh punishment, and put Atheists to death, that we are just being "Xenophobic Ignoramuses"?
If you do, then go suck a bag of muslim dicks.
They sell those?! :eek: Also, your statement seemed to imply suck on the bag itself. What you probably meant to say was to go and get a bag of muslim dicks, and suck each of them individually.
 
Back
Top Bottom