• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Terrorists take over federal Building, threaten violence

One interesting thing I noticed from the review.

The book lists as 'good guys' that the evil government is targeting for attack:
"Those who had bought three or more guns in the last five years and had no criminal or drug use history"

The book lists as 'bad guys' that the evil government is planning to use as enforcers:
"Any who had bought a gun or ammo and did have a criminal history."

Gee.... wouldn't it be better for the 'good guys' if those who had a criminal history not be allowed to buy guns? Wouldn't that reduce the number of potential enforcers for the evil government? If only there were a way to prevent such dangerous people from acquiring lethal weapons.....
 
One interesting thing I noticed from the review.

The book lists as 'good guys' that the evil government is targeting for attack:
"Those who had bought three or more guns in the last five years and had no criminal or drug use history"

The book lists as 'bad guys' that the evil government is planning to use as enforcers:
"Any who had bought a gun or ammo and did have a criminal history."

Gee.... wouldn't it be better for the 'good guys' if those who had a criminal history not be allowed to buy guns? Wouldn't that reduce the number of potential enforcers for the evil government? If only there were a way to prevent such dangerous people from acquiring lethal weapons.....
Actually what he stated was code for 'black men'.
 
Regardless of who directs it, it is going to need a lot of film, perhaps half of the total running time or more, devoted to close up shots of guns in order to properly convey the emotion of the source material.

Who's going to supply the semen, er, gun oil I'm sure Finicum's guns are covered with?

Starbucks. They won't be selling lattes anymore, so they will need to do something with their massive stores of semen.
 
http://www.bendbulletin.com/localst...-at-malheur-17m-and-climbing?referrer=fpblob#

Damage at Malheur: $1.7M and climbing

Refuge that was occupied by militants may reopen by early summer

The septic system stopped working due to overuse while the headquarters was occupied, Holm said, and was damaged further when contractors hired by Fish and Wildlife attempted to repair it. Holm said it’s expected all repairs of the headquarters area will be complete by early summer, allowing employees and the public to return.
 
Ever hear of a broom guys? I mean it's not like you didn't have time to tidy up a bit.
 
I think the jackasses should be handed the repair bill with liens against any property they have and garnishments of any money they ever get.
 
Hey looky! Tractors filled with gas! Vrooom! Vroom! Let's dig some big holes!

Monkeys with tractors. Chitter, chitter, chee, chee, chee!
 
I think the jackasses should be handed the repair bill with liens against any property they have and garnishments of any money they ever get.

Do you think jackasses from other protest movements who damage property and cost taxpayers big $ by obstructing bridges & freeways, etc should pay the bill also for the costs they incur? Groups like Occupy Wall Street, Black Lives Matter, etc. If not, why not?
 
I think the jackasses should be handed the repair bill with liens against any property they have and garnishments of any money they ever get.
Do you think jackasses from other protest movements who damage property and cost taxpayers big $ by obstructing bridges & freeways, etc should pay the bill also for the costs they incur? Groups like Occupy Wall Street, Black Lives Matter, etc. If not, why not?
There is some reasoning to this. One thing people never ever think of, despite doing it multiple times a day is the potty. One problem with OWS was they were not prepared to go potty. It was an afterthought and local businesses did have issues with this.

The assholes in Oregon did too. They need to dig a potty trench in order to strike a blow at the mighty Federal Government.

Protestors need to be aware of the damage or issues they may cause by their presence enmasse.
 
Do you think jackasses from other protest movements who damage property and cost taxpayers big $ by obstructing bridges & freeways, etc should pay the bill also for the costs they incur? Groups like Occupy Wall Street, Black Lives Matter, etc. If not, why not?
There is some reasoning to this. One thing people never ever think of, despite doing it multiple times a day is the potty. One problem with OWS was they were not prepared to go potty. It was an afterthought and local businesses did have issues with this.

The assholes in Oregon did too. They need to dig a potty trench in order to strike a blow at the mighty Federal Government.

Protestors need to be aware of the damage or issues they may cause by their presence enmasse.

I would have at least ordered a porta-john service. I need to write a book about occupying a federal buildings in the middle of no-where.
 
From what I've been reading, the trench was originally dug as a defense measure against a Fed raid. Talk about multi-tasking! :eek:
 

Elsewhere I ran into a little problem here: It looks like the prosecutor mischarged them--they weren't guilty of what they were charged with even though they're obviously guilty in general. I wonder if the prosecutor is a secret sympathizer.

Four of the seven defendants are charged with possessing guns in a federal facility

So what would be the appropriate charge for these four, possession of a dildo in a federal facility? I'm pretty certain there was someone on the jury who was out to nullify on every charge.
 
Back
Top Bottom