• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Emails - the gift that won't ^&%$$^$^&*! stop giving

I heard that one too, did a good job on explaining why it shouldn't be prosecuted going by current standards.

They keep the discussion fairly lively. I'm going to listen to the one on the sovereign citizen kooks tomorrow. Should be a hoot.
 
For whatever reason there seems to have been a breach of security procedures by Hilary Clinton in that she was apparently sending secure emails through normal channels, which presented a greater risk of persons gaining access. A full investigation and a findings report should be conducted.

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-clinton-emails-idUSKCN0YV2P3

The statement below would give reason for investigation of breaches of national security.

The old article from the Washington Post suggests double standards of imposing penalties for security breaches
https://www.washingtonpost.com/arch...e-loose/6a928f72-d79b-430d-9c0b-93c67af05568/

Law enforcement and intelligence officials said State Department deliberations about the covert CIA drone program should have been conducted over a more secure government computer system designed to handle classified information, the Journal reported.
"If I had top-secret information on my home computer" while on active duty, "I would be investigated by the criminal investigative division, I would lose my clearance forever, and if it were top-secret or above, as it was in the Deutch case, I cannot imagine not being court-martialed--with jail time," said retired Army Lt. Col. Ralph Peters, an author and military analyst.

Some people with knowledge of past civilian and military cases, many of which have never been made public, allege a pattern of unfairness.

"There is a double standard. The more senior you are, the less chance you pay a heavy penalty," said a former senior intelligence official. He recalled, for example, that a top Pentagon official during the Nixon administration was found to have committed serious violations, and "everyone just walked away from it."

"There's no accountability," agreed Melvin A. Goodman, a former senior CIA analyst and professor of international security at the National War College. "What Deutch did, that was pretty gross. Important people seem to get away with more than lesser people."

The Deutch affair particularly rankles Norman A. Germino, who lost his job at the National Security Agency seven years ago for taking home documents that he contends were completely innocuous, such as a map and a foreign vocabulary list.

"The security people at NSA don't distinguish between serious breaches of intelligence--something a spy would do--and inadvertent mistakes," said Germino, who now works as a case manager in Maryland's Division of Corrections. "Deutch, being the . . . top man in the intelligence community, probably had some serious stuff. My stuff, it was junk. And I never put it on a computer where people could access it."

For comparison purposes, a report on the Deutch affair by the CIA's inspector general also outlines a remarkably similar security breach that was punished more swiftly and firmly.

In November 1996, Fritz Ermarth, a CIA senior intelligence analyst, was found to have written a document with the highest level of classification on his home computer, which was used to visit Internet sites. As in Deutch's case, members of Ermarth's family had access to the computer.


Wherever there is a breach of security, this should be investigated followed by findings and recommendations. In addition the penalties should be consistent with the nature of the breach, the seniority of the person investigated and the importance of the nature of such a breach.
 
Hahaha, we all thought this was over.

Not I.

As it was always based on nothing of any importance, it was always obvious to me that it would never be over. Just like the moon landing and 9/11 conspiracy theories, for the believers will take it to their graves; and Hillary's partisan opponents have everything to gain and little to lose by vigorously stirring the pot at least until Election Day - and not just this Election Day, but every single one from now until she retires.

How effective that is is a function of the gullibility of the fraction of the electorate who are able to be swayed by this crap - and my gut feeling is that Trump has already locked in most of the all important gullible moron demographic. Sadly for him, that group can only get him to about 40-45% of the vote, and literally nobody else is going to back him for President.
 
Carlos Danger strikes again!
Would not it be hilarious If Carlos Danger make Trump a president? Trump could make him a Secretary of State :) Huma then would say "Come on!"
 
And an ethics complaint has been filed against Comey.

- - - Updated - - -

For whatever reason there seems to have been a breach of security procedures by Hilary Clinton in that she was apparently sending secure emails through normal channels, which presented a greater risk of persons gaining access. A full investigation and a findings report should be conducted.

It already was done.
 
Anybody getting their panties in a bunch over emails is either a jaded lying sack of shit or incredibly gullible.

The Republicans understand the big lie.

Pretend that a bunch of worthless and meaningless emails mean something.

Only an idiot would buy this shit however.

When you got absolutely no ideas you talk about emails.
 
Anybody getting their panties in a bunch over emails is either a jaded lying sack of shit or incredibly gullible.

When someone without a security clearance tells me how unimportant the emails are...

Your constant blathering about your security clearance and the special insight it gives you is tiring. You are not the only person here who has had a security clearance. I had one as well, I was a nuclear certified weapons tech in the Air Force. Hillary's emails do not concern me one bit, just like Colin Powell's previously existing identical email server setup does not bother me.
 
When someone without a security clearance tells me how unimportant the emails are...

Your constant blathering about your security clearance and the special insight it gives you is tiring. You are not the only person here who has had a security clearance.

True. Most people with high clearance don't talk about it. Those who do, end up very quickly with a reduced level.

I had one as well, I was a nuclear certified weapons tech in the Air Force. Hillary's emails do not concern me one bit, just like Colin Powell's previously existing identical email server setup does not bother me.

Really? But... emails! Doesn't bother you? How about EMAILS! EMAILS EMAILS EMAILS!!!! Still not bothered? Try this: emails, EMAILS EMAILS EMAILS EEEEEMAILSSSS!!!!

If you're not bothered by now, you never should have had ANY clearance! :)
 
Trump Willing to Keep Parts of Obamacare, Stays Mum on Clinton Prosecution - ABC News

Trump also appeared to back off his desire to appoint a special prosecutor to investigate Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server, which prompted chants of “Lock Her Up!” at his rallies.
“It’s not something I’ve given a lot of thought, because I want to solve health care, jobs, border control, tax reform,” he said.

They got to Trump! The Clinton globalist cabal is truly all powerful.

Sad.
 
Back
Top Bottom