Kharakov
Quantum Hot Dog
Well, it's not woo, it's logical. You're making illogical assumptions about the nature of energy, assuming that it is not conscious when it reacts, even though your reactions are the reactions of energy to other energy.Actually, either way, i'm saying that 'logic' is an artifact of intelligence, not something that can exist without an intelligence. You want to posit some woo that made it before man made it, that doesn't really challenge my main point.You're assuming that consciousness did not precede the universe itself. You might be assuming that "space" is not consciously aware of what or who exists within it, attempting to balance the desires of all beings within it, with a conscious plan for the future of all (which includes order, and a bit of chaos).
You accept conservation of energy but think that energy needs another universe to track what it is doing? How does "space" keep track of what is in it and how to react? How does light travel? How does matter retain its inertia?But i'm curious. If the Universe is self-aware, where is the universe's memory kept? Wouldn't it require several universes just to keep track of all the fiddly bits in this one?
What moves us and forms our thoughts and experiences does not require some "thing" to "remember". Some assume that all consciousness is dependent upon "things" which are not conscious, because this is the basic, fallacious assumption some base their conclusions about reality upon. Some assume things, based on strawmen about how things should or would be if "X" existed, and make judgements based upon fallacious things that others have said. And some enjoy the fight, or the argument, and will take the lie as far as it will go, after all, it's a zoo, and someone has to play the monkey.