However you feel about the merits of that amendment, it is not about blocking states from doing anything.HuffPo said:Kennedy is attempting to insert the issue into Republicans’ latest bill to repeal the Affordable Care Act. Under the so-called Cassidy-Graham legislation, states would be given block grants to set up their own health care systems. While the fate of the bill is unclear, the Louisiana senator seeks to add an amendment that would prevent states from using federal money for a single-payer system.
The headline is misleading. His proposal is not about blocking states from setting up anything, but about use of federal funds as part of the latest Obamacare repeal bill.
However you feel about the merits of that amendment, it is not about blocking states from doing anything.HuffPo said:Kennedy is attempting to insert the issue into Republicans’ latest bill to repeal the Affordable Care Act. Under the so-called Cassidy-Graham legislation, states would be given block grants to set up their own health care systems. While the fate of the bill is unclear, the Louisiana senator seeks to add an amendment that would prevent states from using federal money for a single-payer system.
California should consider breaking off into its own country and then a bunch of other places should go and consider the same thing.
Curse you, Sen. John Kennedy R-LA!
So, in the 240 years states have had the right to set up their own single payer system before Sen. John Kennedy rendered it nigh impossible how many have done it?
I can picture many Republicans thinking that California should do that.California should consider breaking off into its own country and then a bunch of other places should go and consider the same thing.
I can picture many Republicans thinking that California should do that.California should consider breaking off into its own country and then a bunch of other places should go and consider the same thing.
Curse you, Sen. John Kennedy R-LA!
So, in the 240 years states have had the right to set up their own single payer system before Sen. John Kennedy rendered it nigh impossible how many have done it?
A few (Hawaii, Maryland(?)) and they work pretty well where implemented.

California should consider breaking off into its own country and then a bunch of other places should go and consider the same thing.
https://yescalifornia.org/
Become a Volunteer
The campaign for California independence requires supporters on the ground, on the phones, and online. We need you to help us spread the message of California’s future throughout California and the rest of the country. Everything we have achieved so far we owe to the hard work of volunteers. We can’t do this without you.
Curse you, Sen. John Kennedy R-LA!
So, in the 240 years states have had the right to set up their own single payer system before Sen. John Kennedy rendered it nigh impossible how many have done it?
A few (Hawaii, Maryland(?)) and they work pretty well where implemented.
A few (Hawaii, Maryland(?)) and they work pretty well where implemented.
I checked wikipedia and they don't seem to be aware of these existing.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single-payer_healthcare
But maybe they are like socialism. They they don't actually exist, but damn they work great!
I checked wikipedia and they don't seem to be aware of these existing.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single-payer_healthcare
But maybe they are like socialism. They they don't actually exist, but damn they work great!
My mistake, I was thinking of this.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawaii_Prepaid_Health_Care_Act
And this
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massachusetts_health_care_reform
Not single payer, but forms of Proto-ACA
Curse you, Sen. John Kennedy R-LA!
So, in the 240 years states have had the right to set up their own single payer system before Sen. John Kennedy rendered it nigh impossible how many have done it?
Curse you, Sen. John Kennedy R-LA!
So, in the 240 years states have had the right to set up their own single payer system before Sen. John Kennedy rendered it nigh impossible how many have done it?
So, your rationale is: since no State has ever done it, it makes perfect sense to enact legislation to keep them from doing it now?
In other words, a solution searching for a problem.
So, your rationale is: since no State has ever done it, it makes perfect sense to enact legislation to keep them from doing it now?
In other words, a solution searching for a problem.
You mean other than the fact his legislation does not actually prevent them from doing it now?
No, that wasn't my point.
You mean other than the fact his legislation does not actually prevent them from doing it now?
Your statement did not take this fact into account, so why should my response?
No, that wasn't my point.
Your point seemed to be that no State had set up single payer in 240 years prior to this legislation, which implies the legislation is harmless, since it doesn't impede anything that States have done. If you had another point, perhaps you should state what that point is, and exactly how one should arrive at that point from the statement you made.
You mean other than the fact his legislation does not actually prevent them from doing it now?