Come Hell or High Water: You go, Milo!

[ZiprHead]

Can we throw Milo in a river at high water point?

 

[whichphilosophy]

The police are paid to do a job. They are neither right wing or left wing. How and why is it that you do not know that?

When people exercise discretion while doing their job, they often use their ideology and preferences in making their choice. Why is it you do not know that?

They may have different ideologies as part of human nature etc, but what evidence is there of this where it has had a detrimental and abundant impact on their actions.

The problem with protests is they take place and make accusations prior to due process.

 

[ronburgundy]

Milo is an attention whore. If these people really wanted to deal with him effectively, they should boycott of his rant and quietly encourage others to boycott it as well.

People will still come to see this attention whore. In fact tell enough people not to attend an event and they will turn up.

Well yes, the alt-right is comprised entirely of people with the emotional and intellectual maturity of a 12 year old boy that does destructive things out of nothing but childish defiance.

 

[laughing dog]

When people exercise discretion while doing their job, they often use their ideology and preferences in making their choice. Why is it you do not know that?

They may have different ideologies as part of human nature etc, but what evidence is there of this where it has had a detrimental and abundant impact on their actions.

FFS, whenever the police shoot an unarmed and innocent civilian, that is evidence. DUH.

The problem with protests is they take place and make accusations prior to due process.

When people protest against BEHAVIOR or POLICY and make accusations, there is not necessarily or usually any question of due process, so what are you babbling about?

 

[whichphilosophy]

They may have different ideologies as part of human nature etc, but what evidence is there of this where it has had a detrimental and abundant impact on their actions.

FFS, whenever the police shoot an unarmed and innocent civilian, that is evidence. DUH.

The problem with protests is they take place and make accusations prior to due process.

When people protest against BEHAVIOR or POLICY and make accusations, there is not necessarily or usually any question of due process, so what are you babbling about?

First is an investigation before jumping to conclusion. There is of course due process for the accused, namely fair treatment of the accused through the judicial system.
If they protest without taking these into consideration and the press speculate while others incite groups of people with no investigation and trial as applicable then we have something not much better than a lynch mob mentality.

 

[LordKiran]

FFS, whenever the police shoot an unarmed and innocent civilian, that is evidence. DUH.

The problem with protests is they take place and make accusations prior to due process.

When people protest against BEHAVIOR or POLICY and make accusations, there is not necessarily or usually any question of due process, so what are you babbling about?

First is an investigation before jumping to conclusion. There is of course due process for the accused, namely fair treatment of the accused through the judicial system.
If they protest without taking these into consideration and the press speculate while others incite groups of people with no investigation and trial as applicable then we have something not much better than a lynch mob mentality.

Because the problem isn't the trials, the problem is that cops can murder people and get away with it.

 

[laughing dog]

FFS, whenever the police shoot an unarmed and innocent civilian, that is evidence. DUH.

The problem with protests is they take place and make accusations prior to due process.

When people protest against BEHAVIOR or POLICY and make accusations, there is not necessarily or usually any question of due process, so what are you babbling about?

First is an investigation before jumping to conclusion. There is of course due process for the accused, namely fair treatment of the accused through the judicial system.
If they protest without taking these into consideration and the press speculate while others incite groups of people with no investigation and trial as applicable then we have something not much better than a lynch mob mentality.

Expanding your babble with more babble is not helpful.

 

[WAB]

FFS, whenever the police shoot an unarmed and innocent civilian, that is evidence. DUH.

The problem with protests is they take place and make accusations prior to due process.

When people protest against BEHAVIOR or POLICY and make accusations, there is not necessarily or usually any question of due process, so what are you babbling about?

First is an investigation before jumping to conclusion. There is of course due process for the accused, namely fair treatment of the accused through the judicial system.
If they protest without taking these into consideration and the press speculate while others incite groups of people with no investigation and trial as applicable then we have something not much better than a lynch mob mentality.

Expanding your babble with more babble is not helpful.

Laughing pooch, will you please stop babbling all over my thread? Please? We'll go and get ice cream!

 

[Don2 (Don1 Revised)]

FFS, whenever the police shoot an unarmed and innocent civilian, that is evidence. DUH.

The problem with protests is they take place and make accusations prior to due process.

When people protest against BEHAVIOR or POLICY and make accusations, there is not necessarily or usually any question of due process, so what are you babbling about?

First is an investigation before jumping to conclusion. There is of course due process for the accused, namely fair treatment of the accused through the judicial system.
If they protest without taking these into consideration and the press speculate while others incite groups of people with no investigation and trial as applicable then we have something not much better than a lynch mob mentality.

Expanding your babble with more babble is not helpful.

Laughing pooch, will you please stop babbling all over my thread? Please? We'll go and get ice cream!

You are not allowed to write until laughing dog gets a trial. Neither am I.

[/thread]

 

[WAB]

FFS, whenever the police shoot an unarmed and innocent civilian, that is evidence. DUH.

The problem with protests is they take place and make accusations prior to due process.

When people protest against BEHAVIOR or POLICY and make accusations, there is not necessarily or usually any question of due process, so what are you babbling about?

First is an investigation before jumping to conclusion. There is of course due process for the accused, namely fair treatment of the accused through the judicial system.
If they protest without taking these into consideration and the press speculate while others incite groups of people with no investigation and trial as applicable then we have something not much better than a lynch mob mentality.

Expanding your babble with more babble is not helpful.

Laughing pooch, will you please stop babbling all over my thread? Please? We'll go and get ice cream!

You are not allowed to write until laughing dog gets a trial. Neither am I.

[/thread]

I'm currently being harassed by laughing dog in private messages. And I am beginning to consider the idea that he/she may be in need of medication, intervention, or something. I have tried complete surrender, humor, and other forms of capitulation to he/she's ego. But I keep getting messages. I will resort to the ignore thingy, if it becomes necessary, but I'd rather figure laughing dog out, and make he/she happy, if only I can. I told laughing dog that I loved him/her. But it was to no avail. We shall try harder...

 

[LordKiran]

FFS, whenever the police shoot an unarmed and innocent civilian, that is evidence. DUH.

The problem with protests is they take place and make accusations prior to due process.

When people protest against BEHAVIOR or POLICY and make accusations, there is not necessarily or usually any question of due process, so what are you babbling about?

First is an investigation before jumping to conclusion. There is of course due process for the accused, namely fair treatment of the accused through the judicial system.
If they protest without taking these into consideration and the press speculate while others incite groups of people with no investigation and trial as applicable then we have something not much better than a lynch mob mentality.

Expanding your babble with more babble is not helpful.

Laughing pooch, will you please stop babbling all over my thread? Please? We'll go and get ice cream!

You are not allowed to write until laughing dog gets a trial. Neither am I.

[/thread]

I'm currently being harassed by laughing dog in private messages. And I am beginning to consider the idea that he/she may be in need of medication, intervention, or something. I have tried complete surrender, humor, and other forms of capitulation to he/she's ego. But I keep getting messages. I will resort to the ignore thingy, if it becomes necessary, but I'd rather figure laughing dog out, and make he/she happy, if only I can. I told laughing dog that I loved him/her. But it was to no avail. We shall try harder...

I suggest taking things up with mods rather than trying to make your interpersonal dilemmas into a public spectacle.

 

[WAB]

FFS, whenever the police shoot an unarmed and innocent civilian, that is evidence. DUH.

The problem with protests is they take place and make accusations prior to due process.

When people protest against BEHAVIOR or POLICY and make accusations, there is not necessarily or usually any question of due process, so what are you babbling about?

First is an investigation before jumping to conclusion. There is of course due process for the accused, namely fair treatment of the accused through the judicial system.
If they protest without taking these into consideration and the press speculate while others incite groups of people with no investigation and trial as applicable then we have something not much better than a lynch mob mentality.

Expanding your babble with more babble is not helpful.

Laughing pooch, will you please stop babbling all over my thread? Please? We'll go and get ice cream!

You are not allowed to write until laughing dog gets a trial. Neither am I.

[/thread]

I'm currently being harassed by laughing dog in private messages. And I am beginning to consider the idea that he/she may be in need of medication, intervention, or something. I have tried complete surrender, humor, and other forms of capitulation to he/she's ego. But I keep getting messages. I will resort to the ignore thingy, if it becomes necessary, but I'd rather figure laughing dog out, and make he/she happy, if only I can. I told laughing dog that I loved him/her. But it was to no avail. We shall try harder...

I suggest taking things up with mods rather than trying to make your interpersonal dilemmas into a public spectacle.

Hey, excellent idea! I may report laughing dog to the mods, if this continues.

 

[LordKiran]

FFS, whenever the police shoot an unarmed and innocent civilian, that is evidence. DUH.

The problem with protests is they take place and make accusations prior to due process.

When people protest against BEHAVIOR or POLICY and make accusations, there is not necessarily or usually any question of due process, so what are you babbling about?

First is an investigation before jumping to conclusion. There is of course due process for the accused, namely fair treatment of the accused through the judicial system.
If they protest without taking these into consideration and the press speculate while others incite groups of people with no investigation and trial as applicable then we have something not much better than a lynch mob mentality.

Expanding your babble with more babble is not helpful.

Laughing pooch, will you please stop babbling all over my thread? Please? We'll go and get ice cream!

You are not allowed to write until laughing dog gets a trial. Neither am I.

[/thread]

I'm currently being harassed by laughing dog in private messages. And I am beginning to consider the idea that he/she may be in need of medication, intervention, or something. I have tried complete surrender, humor, and other forms of capitulation to he/she's ego. But I keep getting messages. I will resort to the ignore thingy, if it becomes necessary, but I'd rather figure laughing dog out, and make he/she happy, if only I can. I told laughing dog that I loved him/her. But it was to no avail. We shall try harder...

I suggest taking things up with mods rather than trying to make your interpersonal dilemmas into a public spectacle.

Hey, excellent idea! I may report laughing dog to the mods, if this continues.

No no, as in: You should have done that first and then nothing else. Because in the court of community opinion you're going to fight an uphill battle if this is how you choose to deal with the problem. People don't know you the way they do LD, who has seniority and credibility over you. So it's not just because it annoys me to see you making public accusations against another member's conduct (Willing to bet I'm not the only one btw) but also because in this particular arena you're likely to lose. A wise general picks the field of battle to suit his circumstances. You did not.

Anywhom, I'm relatively new here but have known LD longer than you. He doesn't strike me as the type to go off on one unprovoked. And I'm willing to bet anything you're not being entirely up-front as I assume your private conversation has something to do with that (Slightly)condescending post you made to him yesterday

 

[repoman]

 

[WAB]

FFS, whenever the police shoot an unarmed and innocent civilian, that is evidence. DUH.

The problem with protests is they take place and make accusations prior to due process.

When people protest against BEHAVIOR or POLICY and make accusations, there is not necessarily or usually any question of due process, so what are you babbling about?

First is an investigation before jumping to conclusion. There is of course due process for the accused, namely fair treatment of the accused through the judicial system.
If they protest without taking these into consideration and the press speculate while others incite groups of people with no investigation and trial as applicable then we have something not much better than a lynch mob mentality.

Expanding your babble with more babble is not helpful.

Laughing pooch, will you please stop babbling all over my thread? Please? We'll go and get ice cream!

You are not allowed to write until laughing dog gets a trial. Neither am I.

[/thread]

I'm currently being harassed by laughing dog in private messages. And I am beginning to consider the idea that he/she may be in need of medication, intervention, or something. I have tried complete surrender, humor, and other forms of capitulation to he/she's ego. But I keep getting messages. I will resort to the ignore thingy, if it becomes necessary, but I'd rather figure laughing dog out, and make he/she happy, if only I can. I told laughing dog that I loved him/her. But it was to no avail. We shall try harder...

I suggest taking things up with mods rather than trying to make your interpersonal dilemmas into a public spectacle.

Hey, excellent idea! I may report laughing dog to the mods, if this continues.

No no, as in: You should have done that first and then nothing else. Because in the court of community opinion you're going to fight an uphill battle if this is how you choose to deal with the problem. People don't know you the way they do LD, who has seniority and credibility over you. So it's not just because it annoys me to see you making public accusations against another member's conduct (Willing to bet I'm not the only one btw) but also because in this particular arena you're likely to lose. A wise general picks the field of battle to suit his circumstances. You did not.

Anywhom, I'm relatively new here but have known LD longer than you. He doesn't strike me as the type to go off on one unprovoked. And I'm willing to bet anything you're not being entirely up-front as I assume your private conversation has something to do with that (Slightly)condescending post you made to him yesterday

Bullshit. Lol!

Do you people have any sense of decency?

LOL!

 

[LordKiran]

FFS, whenever the police shoot an unarmed and innocent civilian, that is evidence. DUH.

The problem with protests is they take place and make accusations prior to due process.

When people protest against BEHAVIOR or POLICY and make accusations, there is not necessarily or usually any question of due process, so what are you babbling about?

First is an investigation before jumping to conclusion. There is of course due process for the accused, namely fair treatment of the accused through the judicial system.
If they protest without taking these into consideration and the press speculate while others incite groups of people with no investigation and trial as applicable then we have something not much better than a lynch mob mentality.

Expanding your babble with more babble is not helpful.

Laughing pooch, will you please stop babbling all over my thread? Please? We'll go and get ice cream!

You are not allowed to write until laughing dog gets a trial. Neither am I.

[/thread]

I'm currently being harassed by laughing dog in private messages. And I am beginning to consider the idea that he/she may be in need of medication, intervention, or something. I have tried complete surrender, humor, and other forms of capitulation to he/she's ego. But I keep getting messages. I will resort to the ignore thingy, if it becomes necessary, but I'd rather figure laughing dog out, and make he/she happy, if only I can. I told laughing dog that I loved him/her. But it was to no avail. We shall try harder...

I suggest taking things up with mods rather than trying to make your interpersonal dilemmas into a public spectacle.

Hey, excellent idea! I may report laughing dog to the mods, if this continues.

No no, as in: You should have done that first and then nothing else. Because in the court of community opinion you're going to fight an uphill battle if this is how you choose to deal with the problem. People don't know you the way they do LD, who has seniority and credibility over you. So it's not just because it annoys me to see you making public accusations against another member's conduct (Willing to bet I'm not the only one btw) but also because in this particular arena you're likely to lose. A wise general picks the field of battle to suit his circumstances. You did not.

Anywhom, I'm relatively new here but have known LD longer than you. He doesn't strike me as the type to go off on one unprovoked. And I'm willing to bet anything you're not being entirely up-front as I assume your private conversation has something to do with that (Slightly)condescending post you made to him yesterday

Bullshit. Lol!

Do you people have any sense of decency?

LOL!

Oh yeah you came on in the same year. Still don't really know you though.

In any case I stand by my overall assessment. Airing personal grievances is best done in private. In most cultures, that is considered a form of decency.

 

[Don2 (Don1 Revised)]

Hmmm...

Laughing pooch, will you please stop babbling all over my thread? Please? We'll go and get ice cream!

Followed by:

I'm currently being harassed by laughing dog in private messages.

LOL, that is what William asked for above! laughing dog, if I could give positive rep to your private messages I would.

I told laughing dog that I loved him/her. But it was to no avail. We shall try harder...

It sounds like William's PM's are just as off-target and personal as his regular posts.

 

[ZiprHead]

View attachment 12638

Is this saying Milo got married? If so, congrats to him.

Also if so, does that mean he's going to stop screwing under-age boys?

 

[laughing dog]

I'm currently being harassed by laughing dog in private messages. And I am beginning to consider the idea that he/she may be in need of medication, intervention, or something. I have tried complete surrender, humor, and other forms of capitulation to he/she's ego. But I keep getting messages. I will resort to the ignore thingy, if it becomes necessary, but I'd rather figure laughing dog out, and make he/she happy, if only I can. I told laughing dog that I loved him/her. But it was to no avail. We shall try harder...

FFS, buy yourself a pacifier or should I start up a crowd source site for you?

 

[WAB]

I'm currently being harassed by laughing dog in private messages. And I am beginning to consider the idea that he/she may be in need of medication, intervention, or something. I have tried complete surrender, humor, and other forms of capitulation to he/she's ego. But I keep getting messages. I will resort to the ignore thingy, if it becomes necessary, but I'd rather figure laughing dog out, and make he/she happy, if only I can. I told laughing dog that I loved him/her. But it was to no avail. We shall try harder...

FFS, buy yourself a pacifier or should I start up a crowd source site for you?

Well, in my 13 years here, I have put two people on ignore. I took them off ignore a few days later because I felt bad. But you, LD, are going on ignore permanently. I have not read your latest messages (as they have been pure nonsense and hostile). Go bark up someone else's tree, LD.