Another innocent white man persecuted by political correctness run amok!

[Underseer]

https://www.npr.org/2018/06/27/6239...slaying-of-black-man-in-decades-old-cold-case

Moore is also a murder defendant in Coggins' case and will go on trial later this year. CNN reports that Moore, when intoxicated, told a witness that he "missed the good old days when you could kill a black man for no reason."

When will people recognize that white people are the real victims here? Why isn't anyone worried about what's going to happen to Franklin Gebhardt? Oh, right. They don't care what happens to him because he's white. Apparently, we're only allowed to feel sympathy for people if they are minorities. [/conservolibertarian]


Note: I refrained from using the phrase "white genocide" in deference to the feelings of certain very sensitive people around here. I hope you're not too offended that I suggested racist murders are a bad thing. I admit that I am the "real racist" for complaining about the fact that things like this happened in the past and still happen today.

 

[Jason Harvestdancer]

Why do you see him as a persecuted victim?

 

[Jolly_Penguin]

Why do you see him as a persecuted victim?

Methinks Underseer is playing out a dialogue in his own head with an imaginary person claiming he was persecuted. Probably best to step around this one.

 

[Jason Harvestdancer]

Why do you see him as a persecuted victim?

Methinks Underseer is playing out a dialogue in his own head with an imaginary person claiming he was persecuted. Probably best to step around this one.

That is the common opinion around here. I, for one, think that he expresses his real opinions when he uses his sarcasm tag.

 

[Underseer]

Why do you see him as a persecuted victim?

Methinks Underseer is playing out a dialogue in his own head with an imaginary person claiming he was persecuted. Probably best to step around this one.

Uh huh.

And you've never heard conservatives claim that white people are the "real victims"?

They even have a special word for it: white genocide.

 

[Jason Harvestdancer]

Why do you see him as a persecuted victim?

Methinks Underseer is playing out a dialogue in his own head with an imaginary person claiming he was persecuted. Probably best to step around this one.

Uh huh.

And you've never heard conservatives claim that white people are the "real victims"?

They even have a special word for it: white genocide.

You do use that phrase a lot, almost as if you are actually worried about it happening.

 

[Jolly_Penguin]

Uh huh.

And you've never heard conservatives claim that white people are the "real victims"?

They even have a special word for it: white genocide.

You do use that phrase a lot, almost as if you are actually worried about it happening.

Indeed. Underseer is the only one I've seen bringing that phrase up repeatedly. It is like when a preacher goes on and on about the gays. Closet white supremacist in our midst perhaps?

 

[SimpleDon]

https://www.npr.org/2018/06/27/6239...slaying-of-black-man-in-decades-old-cold-case

Moore is also a murder defendant in Coggins' case and will go on trial later this year. CNN reports that Moore, when intoxicated, told a witness that he "missed the good old days when you could kill a black man for no reason."

When will people recognize that white people are the real victims here? Why isn't anyone worried about what's going to happen to Franklin Gebhardt? Oh, right. They don't care what happens to him because he's white. Apparently, we're only allowed to feel sympathy for people if they are minorities. [/conservolibertarian]


Note: I refrained from using the phrase "white genocide" in deference to the feelings of certain very sensitive people around here. I hope you're not too offended that I suggested racist murders are a bad thing. I admit that I am the "real racist" for complaining about the fact that things like this happened in the past and still happen today.

I am not offended at all. I have been called the real racist because I am not afraid of black people and foreigners, because I don't believe that anyone who is willing to work full time should have to endure poverty, that there might be many fewer people on welfare and disability and fewer criminals if we paid people more. That corporate profits and income inequality can be too high for the health of the economy. That arresting illegals is not going to stop the problem because people really don't come here to commit crimes, they come here to work. All of these are radical ideas for some.

A total of five whites were arrested in connection with the crimes, two are charged with the murder and the rest with covering the murder up after the fact. Two of those arrested for the cover up were employed by the police at the time. The Trump told us that the police are corrupt, especially the FBI. Once again, he is proven to be right.

 

[SimpleDon]

Uh huh.

And you've never heard conservatives claim that white people are the "real victims"?

They even have a special word for it: white genocide.

You do use that phrase a lot, almost as if you are actually worried about it happening.

Indeed. Understeer is the only one I've seen bringing that phrase up repeatedly. It is like when a preacher goes on and on about the gays. Closet white supremacist in our midst perhaps?

I have to admit that I thought that ünterseer was just going over the top for his libertarian/conservative tag. But  white genocide is a conspiracy theory of the neo-Nazis.

From the Wikipedia article,

The white genocide conspiracy theory is a Neo-Nazi, white nationalist and supremacist conspiracy theory[1] that mass immigration, racial integration, miscegenation, low fertility rates and abortion are being promoted in predominantly white countries to deliberately turn them minority-white and hence cause white people to become extinct through forced assimilation.[2]

That is presumably the reason for the chant, "we will not be replaced".

 

[Bronzeage]

Uh huh.

And you've never heard conservatives claim that white people are the "real victims"?

They even have a special word for it: white genocide.

You do use that phrase a lot, almost as if you are actually worried about it happening.

Indeed. Underseer is the only one I've seen bringing that phrase up repeatedly. It is like when a preacher goes on and on about the gays. Closet white supremacist in our midst perhaps?

I hear it often enough in a serious completely non-ironic sense. There are people who truly believe that white people have lost something very valuable during the past few decades when the United States went through a brief period of actually upholding its Constitution. When the Constitution was written by a bunch of wealthy white men, none of them could conceive of a time when black people, women, and other various citizens who never had two dimes to rub together, might actually have a say in the politics of the nation. They had absolutely no reason to think that rule by wealthy white me, for wealthy white men, would exist in perpetuity.

So, when we look around and see black people, women, and landless peasants, have the same vote as any wealthy white man, some white men wonder where they suddenly got that privilege. Logic dictates that you can only steal Item A from someone who has Item A. It's known as the "Principle of Conservation of Privilege." It simply means there is a finite amount of privilege in the universe, and when one person rises, another person must fall.

We all know privilege is a good thing to have, and more privilege always better, so the obvious end of this scenario is the eventually loss of all privilege, as it is gobbled up by the previously disenfranchised.

Of course, this group is not totally lacking sophistication. They realize that racism is no longer a socially acceptable identity, and self identifying as a racist just complicates things. This requires their rhetoric to be couched in ciphers, where a particular word of phrase, has a particular meaning within the group, and allows others to recognize them as fellow candidates for white genocide.

Despite this limited sophistication, they are easily spotted because they're the ones who accuse others of racism, when their racism is pointed out.

 

[repoman]

Indeed. Underseer is the only one I've seen bringing that phrase up repeatedly. It is like when a preacher goes on and on about the gays. Closet white supremacist in our midst perhaps?

I hear it often enough in a serious completely non-ironic sense. There are people who truly believe that white people have lost something very valuable during the past few decades when the United States went through a brief period of actually upholding its Constitution. When the Constitution was written by a bunch of wealthy white men, none of them could conceive of a time when black people, women, and other various citizens who never had two dimes to rub together, might actually have a say in the politics of the nation. They had absolutely no reason to think that rule by wealthy white me, for wealthy white men, would exist in perpetuity.

So, when we look around and see black people, women, and landless peasants, have the same vote as any wealthy white man, some white men wonder where they suddenly got that privilege. Logic dictates that you and only steal Item A from someone who has Item A. It's known as the "Principle of Conservation of Privilege." It simply means there is a finite amount of privilege in the universe, and when one person rises, another person must fall.

We all know privilege is a good thing to have, and more privilege always better, so the obvious end of this scenario is the eventually loss of all privilege, as it is gobbled up by the previously disenfranchised.

Of course, this group is not totally lacking sophistication. They realize that racism is no longer a socially acceptable identity, and self identifying as a racist just complicates things. This requires their rhetoric to be couched in ciphers, where a particular word of phrase, has a particular meaning within the group, and allows others to recognize them as fellow candidates for white genocide.

Despite this limited sophistication, they are easily spotted because they're the ones who accuse others of racism, when their racism is pointed out.

Whites don't have the escape hatch of Aliyah that "fellow whites" have.

 

[repoman]

Uh huh.

And you've never heard conservatives claim that white people are the "real victims"?

They even have a special word for it: white genocide.

You do use that phrase a lot, almost as if you are actually worried about it happening.

Indeed. Underseer is the only one I've seen bringing that phrase up repeatedly. It is like when a preacher goes on and on about the gays. Closet white supremacist in our midst perhaps?

Hapa supremacist, just like Kalergi.

 

[Bronzeage]

Indeed. Underseer is the only one I've seen bringing that phrase up repeatedly. It is like when a preacher goes on and on about the gays. Closet white supremacist in our midst perhaps?

I hear it often enough in a serious completely non-ironic sense. There are people who truly believe that white people have lost something very valuable during the past few decades when the United States went through a brief period of actually upholding its Constitution. When the Constitution was written by a bunch of wealthy white men, none of them could conceive of a time when black people, women, and other various citizens who never had two dimes to rub together, might actually have a say in the politics of the nation. They had absolutely no reason to think that rule by wealthy white me, for wealthy white men, would exist in perpetuity.

So, when we look around and see black people, women, and landless peasants, have the same vote as any wealthy white man, some white men wonder where they suddenly got that privilege. Logic dictates that you and only steal Item A from someone who has Item A. It's known as the "Principle of Conservation of Privilege." It simply means there is a finite amount of privilege in the universe, and when one person rises, another person must fall.

We all know privilege is a good thing to have, and more privilege always better, so the obvious end of this scenario is the eventually loss of all privilege, as it is gobbled up by the previously disenfranchised.

Of course, this group is not totally lacking sophistication. They realize that racism is no longer a socially acceptable identity, and self identifying as a racist just complicates things. This requires their rhetoric to be couched in ciphers, where a particular word of phrase, has a particular meaning within the group, and allows others to recognize them as fellow candidates for white genocide.

Despite this limited sophistication, they are easily spotted because they're the ones who accuse others of racism, when their racism is pointed out.

Whites don't have the escape hatch of Aliyah that "fellow whites" have.

Indeed. Underseer is the only one I've seen bringing that phrase up repeatedly. It is like when a preacher goes on and on about the gays. Closet white supremacist in our midst perhaps?

Hapa supremacist, just like Kalergi.

Despite being the smartest white man I know, I have no idea what you are saying.

 

[Derec]

Why do you see him as a persecuted victim?

Methinks Underseer is playing out a dialogue in his own head with an imaginary person claiming he was persecuted. Probably best to step around this one.

I am surprised his threads like this one are not sent ~Elsewhere. Scratch that, I'm not really that surprised.

 

[fromderinside]

Seems to me underseer is framing a modern race relations satire in the image of Washington Irving and doing it pretty well too.

Just watched a couple Archie Bunker (AITF) episodes last night and underseer hit high notes similar to those in the Sammy Davis Jr. episode.

From what I read above Derec is responding like Ardhie did to Sammy's kiss.

 

[Bronzeage]

Seems to me underseer is framing a modern race relations satire in the image of Washington Irving and doing it pretty well too.

Just watched a couple Archie Bunker (AITF) episodes last night and underseer hit high notes similar to those in the Sammy Davis Jr. episode.

From what I read above Derec is responding like Ardhie did to Sammy's kiss.

You have hit upon on of the fundamental problems of this type of discussion. Those who believe there really is a white genocide, sound like parody and satire, to normal people. To compound the problem, the genies are unable to recognize parody and satire, and think attempts to make fun of them, are serious discussion.

 

[Jason Harvestdancer]

Seems to me underseer is framing a modern race relations satire in the image of Washington Irving and doing it pretty well too.

Just watched a couple Archie Bunker (AITF) episodes last night and underseer hit high notes similar to those in the Sammy Davis Jr. episode.

From what I read above Derec is responding like Ardhie did to Sammy's kiss.

You have hit upon on of the fundamental problems of this type of discussion. Those who believe there really is a white genocide, sound like parody and satire, to normal people.

That does explain why people keep thinking that Underseer's posts are satire - they cannot believe he might be serious.

 

[laughing dog]

Seems to me underseer is framing a modern race relations satire in the image of Washington Irving and doing it pretty well too.

Just watched a couple Archie Bunker (AITF) episodes last night and underseer hit high notes similar to those in the Sammy Davis Jr. episode.

From what I read above Derec is responding like Ardhie did to Sammy's kiss.

You have hit upon on of the fundamental problems of this type of discussion. Those who believe there really is a white genocide, sound like parody and satire, to normal people.

That does explain why people keep thinking that Underseer's posts are satire - they cannot believe he might be serious.

For some reason, you clipped the ending to Bronzeage's quote of

To compound the problem, the genies are unable to recognize parody and satire, and think attempts to make fun of them, are serious discussion.

 

[Random Person]

Any kind of genocide is a bad thing.

It's OK to use the term if you're Armenian though.

 

[ZiprHead]

That does explain why people keep thinking that Underseer's posts are satire - they cannot believe he might be serious.

For some reason, you clipped the ending to Bronzeage's quote of

To compound the problem, the genies are unable to recognize parody and satire, and think attempts to make fun of them, are serious discussion.

Telling, isn't it.