It seems pointless to tell people they don't have ''free will'' when the term itself is of no use for our understanding the decision making process, human behaviour or its drivers. It's just a shallow term, a casual reference in every language, rarely used at that.
So you freely claim.
There is nothing the claim is bound to, no knowledge, no experience, no evidence.
The endless and repeated evidence is I can move my arm when and how I desire. Over and over and over.
So it must be a claim made completely free of any influence beyond the desire of one mind.
Why a mind would desire it is another matter. Human desires that are freely acted on can be very strange.
There is no evidence an evolved brain would desire such uselessness.
The endless claim that no distinction exists between a reflexive brain and an active mind is an error in thinking.
A bad choice made freely using an active mind.
You leaned to move your arm, before you even knew you were an I.
So tell us just how you moved your arm? Which signals did you send to which neurons triggering which muscles and to what extent? Don't know, maybe the "you" persona isn't in charge as much as you'd like to think.
Bugs can move too, think they are self-aware, or are they just giving off the illusion of free will?
We aren't people with brains we use to figure things out...
we're brains that have developed personas to help them figure things out.