untermensche
Contributor
That post has nothing but bad opinion.
No meat.
Nothing in need of dispute.
If you had arguments you would make them, not simply assertions about arguments in your mind somewhere.
I used my mind to form these sentences.
Minds understand and can use ideas.
Brains are cells that use glucose and emit small molecules. They do not use ideas to function. They cannot possibly use ideas to make decisions.
More absolute ignorance of my position, although I have stated it.
You have the brain.
You have the activity of the brain. We don't have a clue what subset of activity it is.
You have a product of that activity, the mind. We have no clue what the objective mind is, the specific activity that creates the subjective mind.
And one feature of the mind is it can effect the activity that creates it. It has a feedback ability.
So mind effects activity which effects brain which effects other activity which moves the arm.
So much for all your stupidity about my ontology.
No meat.
Nothing in need of dispute.
If you had arguments you would make them, not simply assertions about arguments in your mind somewhere.
I used my mind to form these sentences.
Minds understand and can use ideas.
Brains are cells that use glucose and emit small molecules. They do not use ideas to function. They cannot possibly use ideas to make decisions.
How--exactly--does any of that allow for it to physically direct arm movement?
More absolute ignorance of my position, although I have stated it.
You have the brain.
You have the activity of the brain. We don't have a clue what subset of activity it is.
You have a product of that activity, the mind. We have no clue what the objective mind is, the specific activity that creates the subjective mind.
And one feature of the mind is it can effect the activity that creates it. It has a feedback ability.
So mind effects activity which effects brain which effects other activity which moves the arm.
So much for all your stupidity about my ontology.