laughing dog
Contributor
Here's an interesting story I ran across
I realize this is just one case, but it does indicate that the usual frothing at the mouth about how divorce law is biased against men and how ex-wives have it easy is not based on reality.
(https://www.yahoo.com/news/ex-wife-273-million-lottery-winner-not-want-back-morals-191620847.html)Murray, the ex-wife of the unemployed New Jersey man, Mike Weirsky, who just won the hefty Mega Millions jackpot, told the New York Post that she has zero plans to return to her husband, to whom she was married to for 15 years before their divorce last October.
“He’s not appealing to me all of a sudden because he has this money,” she told the outlet.
Want daily pop culture news delivered to your inbox? for Yahoo’s newsletter.
Murray told the Post that she was the one bringing home the bacon in the relationship, and she paid — and currently continues to pay — spousal support. She served as a cost analyst for a utilities company while Weirsky remained unemployed.
And while her former husband expects to collect $162.5 million after taxes, she won’t be going after him for what, some would argue, she deserves.
“I’m not going after anything. I have morals. I know what I’ve worked for and it’s everything that I have,” she said.
I realize this is just one case, but it does indicate that the usual frothing at the mouth about how divorce law is biased against men and how ex-wives have it easy is not based on reality.