Almost everything you've posted since.
I see through your thinly veiled attempts at trying to come across as a good person. But you're not. That's the problem here.
If Koy wants to try being civil, should we not encourage that?
Almost everything you've posted since.
I see through your thinly veiled attempts at trying to come across as a good person. But you're not. That's the problem here.
Almost everything you've posted since.
I see through your thinly veiled attempts at trying to come across as a good person. But you're not. That's the problem here.
As far as I can tell, no one on this forum is in favor of treating sex workers as criminals. That's a red herring.
As far as I can tell, no one on this forum is in favor of treating sex workers as criminals. That's a red herring.
Wait. What? Are you are now for legalizing and regulating prostitution, and going after actual sex slavery? Good for you if so.
As far as I can tell, no one on this forum is in favor of treating sex workers as criminals. That's a red herring.
Wait. What? Are you are now for legalizing and regulating prostitution, and going after actual sex slavery? Good for you if so.
There is zero reason to not go after sex slavery now and there is zero reason to believe that legalization will magically make it 'easier' or more logistically possible or more palatable. That's a red herring.
I am in favor of the Swedish model where the prostitutes are not considered criminals but the customers and pimps are.
But more than that, I am in favor of genuine economic reform that provides better alternatives for all women (and for men, too).
There is zero reason to not go after sex slavery now and there is zero reason to believe that legalization will magically make it 'easier' or more logistically possible or more palatable. That's a red herring.
I am in favor of the Swedish model where the prostitutes are not considered criminals but the customers and pimps are.
But more than that, I am in favor of genuine economic reform that provides better alternatives for all women (and for men, too).
I don't see anyone who doesn't think we should go after sex slavery. Where we disagree is the best way to do this--history shows us that attempting to stamp out prostitution does not work so we should approach it like we should approach drugs--harm reduction.
What I hear from those who believe that prostitution should be legalized is that it would make it easier to go after sex trafficking/slavery. I understand that reasoning but it doesn’t seem to be born out in reality.
Are you saying that we need to work harder to eliminate sex trafficking/slavery regardless of whether prostitution is legalized? Because I can agree with that.
What I hear from those who believe that prostitution should be legalized is that it would make it easier to go after sex trafficking/slavery. I understand that reasoning but it doesn’t seem to be born out in reality.
Are you saying that we need to work harder to eliminate sex trafficking/slavery regardless of whether prostitution is legalized? Because I can agree with that.
Well, is having it be illegal making it easier to go after it? Is stopping sex slavery particularly prioritized by police departments anywhere that prostitution is a crime? Do you have any other examples of where driving an industry underground and ensuring that it's completely run by criminals makes it a safer industry for anyone involved in it?
If you have a legal and regulated prostitution industry, authorities can concentrate on the aspects of that industry which are avoiding the regulation and this would allow them to better target their resources which are more likely to be using sex slavery and less likely to be using consenting adults. Now, whether the police bother to use these tools because they prioritize stopping sex slavery or they don't because they couldn't care less is a completely different issue. They have these better tools at their disposal if they choose to use them and I fail to see any similar tools which a police department in an area where prostitution is illegal could also use to similar effect.
There is zero reason to not go after sex slavery now and there is zero reason to believe that legalization will magically make it 'easier' or more logistically possible or more palatable. That's a red herring.
I am in favor of the Swedish model where the prostitutes are not considered criminals but the customers and pimps are.
But more than that, I am in favor of genuine economic reform that provides better alternatives for all women (and for men, too).
I am in favor of the Swedish model where the prostitutes are not considered criminals but the customers and pimps are.
What I hear from those who believe that prostitution should be legalized is that it would make it easier to go after sex trafficking/slavery. I understand that reasoning but it doesn’t seem to be born out in reality.
Are you saying that we need to work harder to eliminate sex trafficking/slavery regardless of whether prostitution is legalized? Because I can agree with that.
Well, is having it be illegal making it easier to go after it? Is stopping sex slavery particularly prioritized by police departments anywhere that prostitution is a crime? Do you have any other examples of where driving an industry underground and ensuring that it's completely run by criminals makes it a safer industry for anyone involved in it?
If you have a legal and regulated prostitution industry, authorities can concentrate on the aspects of that industry which are avoiding the regulation and this would allow them to better target their resources which are more likely to be using sex slavery and less likely to be using consenting adults. Now, whether the police bother to use these tools because they prioritize stopping sex slavery or they don't because they couldn't care less is a completely different issue. They have these better tools at their disposal if they choose to use them and I fail to see any similar tools which a police department in an area where prostitution is illegal could also use to similar effect.
I have seen zero evidence that there is greater concern for the plight of prostitutes who are abused by clients and...managers under legalization. Do you have any such evidence or are you speculating?
The biggest problem with it is that Swedish prostitutes are the target of lots of social measures intended to pressure them into getting other jobs. Prostitutes have had their children taken away from them, simply because they are prostitutes. I know of two women who have been falsely accused of being prostitutes and had to prove in court that they weren't, just to keep their children. Something very traumatic for any parent.
The problem with the Swedish model is that it's not just that prostitution is legalised. It's to make them come out of hiding so that they can be targeted by the authorities. Something which they are of course reluctant to do.
For example, loads of people who are not prostitutes have joined Rose Alliance just to make it harder for the government to keep track of who is genuinely a prostitute. A form of civil disobedience.
The Swedish model is godawful. Either we treat them like adult human beings who are trusted to take adult decisions about their own bodies, or not. The Swedish model is still yet another method by which to take away agency from women.
I have seen zero evidence that there is greater concern for the plight of prostitutes who are abused by clients and...managers under legalization. Do you have any such evidence or are you speculating?
Again, that's a separate issue unless you're making the claim that there is this greater concern for the abused prostitutes under an illegal system, so I don't know how your response references what I said. Up here in Canada, though, police are making an effort to target the sex trafficking industry without concerning themselves with the consensual prostitution industry, so it's quite possible for them to do so. They could also do the exact same thing and devote their resources to this if consensual prostitution were illegal, though, so the whole "greater concern for the plight of prostitutes who are abused" thing isn't dependent on one system or the other. However, a legal and regulated system they would have more tools to help them identify those aspects of the industry which were trying to skirt the regulations and better focus on targeting the abusers.
If your main concern about this industry is reducing the amount of abuse for prostitutes, I really don't see how it is that you feel that keeping prostitution totally illegal is the optimal way to address that concern.
The biggest problem with it is that Swedish prostitutes are the target of lots of social measures intended to pressure them into getting other jobs. Prostitutes have had their children taken away from them, simply because they are prostitutes. I know of two women who have been falsely accused of being prostitutes and had to prove in court that they weren't, just to keep their children. Something very traumatic for any parent.
The problem with the Swedish model is that it's not just that prostitution is legalised. It's to make them come out of hiding so that they can be targeted by the authorities. Something which they are of course reluctant to do.
For example, loads of people who are not prostitutes have joined Rose Alliance just to make it harder for the government to keep track of who is genuinely a prostitute. A form of civil disobedience.
The Swedish model is godawful. Either we treat them like adult human beings who are trusted to take adult decisions about their own bodies, or not. The Swedish model is still yet another method by which to take away agency from women.
To be fair, you wouldn't have to include these problems under a system where sex is legal to sell but illegal to buy. That seems to be something separate that Sweden has implemented. It could be done without social measures intended to pressure them to get other jobs.
But I don't see how a selling is legal and buying is illegal model would in itself help prostitutes in any way. If it is illegal to buy what they are selling, they are pushed right back into the shadows where life is more dangerous. In Toronto this is only alleviated by the fact that the Police target trafficking and abuse in prostitution rather than prostitution itself, which is something they would also be doing if prostitution was fully legal.
I'd like to hear more about how a legal and regulated system would have more tools to help them identify those aspects of the industry that they don't already have. Can you give specific examples?
It was already cited (and not contradicted) that prostitutes report only about 26% of the rapes they experience. According to the DOJ, the general population only reports about 20% of rapes committed so as much as I understand the logic, it doesn't seem that this would really improve if prostitution were to be regarded as merely another career path, presumably for girls and women.
Toni keeps shifting the burden of proof. She keeps asking for evidence that legalization makes it safer. She hasnt responded to either the Bedford decision or the Valerie Scott video I posted. But regardless, even if legalizing it had no safety improvement, so what? The default should be freedom and not oppression. If she has no good reason for it to be illegal, it should be legal.
When hand waving at "trafficking" is done, we have yet to see any data that actual sex slavery increases with legalization, since the studies presented on this include willingly moving to areas where prostitution is legal to engage in the trade as "trafficking".