Who Agrees Fourth Wave Feminism is Toxic Femininity And Should Be Abolished?

[Cheerful Charlie]

Who cares what you think?

 

[Derec]

This shows how dangerous masculinism is.

Wrong. Naik's position has nothing to do with "masculinism". It is an argument based on Islam. So it shows how dangerous Islam is.

 

[Derec]

Who cares what you think?

You are free not to respond dude.

 

[Derec]

Also, they should be in Muslim countries, fighting Islamic treatments of womens.

Or at least more forcefully object to Trump's idiotic behavior in the Middle East.

I do recall that right after the Shah fell, and Khomeni's regime was making sweeping, conservative reforms, some feminists did travel to Iran for just that purpose, telling them to stop being dicks to people without dicks. IIRC, they got deported.

Speaking about Iran, at the same time American feminists were gushing about Islam and were "trying on hijabs" at the Women's March, brave women in Iran were taking them off why nary a comment by these feminists.

 

[Derec]

You write this like they are the same women.

Not the same women of course, but they are sampled from the same population.

Or are you painting the entire gender with the brush you had as a youth?
If I judged all men by the ones I knew in my 20s, and assigned them punishment for what those 20-somethings did... wow, that would be pretty outlandish.

It's not so much judging, but not seeing why I should try to pursue women again.

 

[Derec]

Probably from the same source that says if the promiscuous person is female, she is to be called a slut, NEVER a "player" with "side studs",

"Side dick" is better as it rhymes.
While there are promiscuous women, and I do not judge for being promiscuous, I would say their numbers are far lower than the numbers of male "players".

and that true incels will react with revulsion when meeting one,

I don't react with revulsion, but ...

NEVER with hope and gladness,

... I don't have hope either. She may want to fuck every Tom, Dick and Harry, but I don't think she'd want to fuck me.

 

[Derec]

There are NOT a “lot”.
Where do you get this nonsense?

It's my perception that "players" are quite common. Do you have any data that contradicts that?

 

[Don2 (Don1 Revised)]

This shows how dangerous masculinism is.

Wrong. Naik's position has nothing to do with "masculinism". It is an argument based on Islam. So it shows how dangerous Islam is.

It's a man talking about patriarchy. The three are not mutually exclusive. Nice try, though!

 

[Don2 (Don1 Revised)]

Also, they should be in Muslim countries, fighting Islamic treatments of womens.

Or at least more forcefully object to Trump's idiotic behavior in the Middle East.

I do recall that right after the Shah fell, and Khomeni's regime was making sweeping, conservative reforms, some feminists did travel to Iran for just that purpose, telling them to stop being dicks to people without dicks. IIRC, they got deported.

Speaking about Iran, at the same time American feminists were gushing about Islam and were "trying on hijabs" at the Women's March, brave women in Iran were taking them off why nary a comment by these feminists.
View attachment 24301

And who's oppressing them? MEN! And who else is getting oppressed? MEN!

Yet Men's Rights Activists are busy complaining about ring girls and seeing women's boobs and rights to man spreading!

 

[Derec]

Why am I not surprised you didn't bother to check that stupid meme for accuracy before you posted it?

I guess I should have. So MacKinnon did not really say that. It was misattributed. But that doesn't show my point about a large intersection between socialism and feminism is false. I mean, your quote shows that a whole book was written about the topic, so that's not exactly refuting what I was saying.

And I could always find more pictures.

 

[Derec]

And who's oppressing them? MEN! And who else is getting oppressed? MEN!

Not quite true. There are many women who support the tenets of the "Islamic Revolution". In Iran both men and women are oppressed by ISLAM.

Yet Men's Rights Activists are busy complaining about ring girls and seeing women's boobs and rights to man spreading!

The ayatollahs and radical feminists in the West are more similar than either would ever admit, but both are really driven by the desire to control other people's lives.

What's wrong with grid/ring girls? They are consenting adults after all and get paid for it.
What's wrong with looking at boobs? I certainly won't stop because Julie Bindel and Gail Dines think it's the feminist equivalent of a deadly sin.

And manspreading is necessary when seats are too narrow.

 

[Derec]

It's a man talking about patriarchy.

No, it's an ISLAMIC scholar talking about ISLAM. Nice try though.

 

[Jarhyn]

It's a man talking about patriarchy.

No, it's an ISLAMIC scholar talking about ISLAM. Nice try though.

No, it's just a hyperconservative man talking about patriarchy. I could find you an example of a Christian saying equally repugnant things to justify Christian's doing repugnant sex acts if you like. Islam is just the fig leaf this particular repugnant person is hiding behind.

 

[Keith&Co.]

Touchingbtheir pussy withou permission IS NOT PLAYFUL! which should ge established well before genital exploration. your anecdote strays further and further from the Groper In Chief you are trying to defend. He made no mention of playful, waiting for their reaction,etc.
Just straight up grab 'em by the pussy.
How would you like it if a beard-sporting biker grabbed your balls as you walked by his table?

It's like you guys are 13!!!

yes, yes, only a teenager would respect personal boundaries, esp in the other genders.
You have seen the light, though, and find the Chad myth to be true.

There are women who would let you grab them, Keith.

Except i don't do thst.
And we are talking about Trump. Who said he grabbed their pussy without waiting, without asking.
This does not reflect choosing cooperative women, or tgat any had a chance to 'let'them.

Not all women, but some women. That's who Trump was talking about.

No reason to think so. Remember his response to more than one charge of sexual assault was NOT
A) I don't do that
B) That would be wrong
But c) That woman is not attractive enough for me to assault her sexually.
This is not a man overly concerned with women's consent.

 

[Keith&Co.]

Wut a load of shit.

I was always a good guy, never ever considered good looking. After I got over my adolescent shyness, I had little trouble getting women.

I never said it was every single man or every single woman.

Why do you guys always jump to absolutes?

Because you post in absolutes.

See, if you mean 'some' women, then take care to say 'some' women.
Not "women are..." that is absolute.

 

[Toni]

The ‘female mind???’

My sympathies to your wife, if indeed, she exists.

The male mind is lead by logic. The female mind is lead by emotions.

Apparently your mind is lead by delusion.

What gender does that make you:

This is common knowledge.

If you are equating knowledge with bigotry, it makes it much more difficult to make your case that men's minds are lead by logic.

It doesn't mean that every single female is illogical, but for the most part, women think with their emotions.

Wow. This is really like saying that men think with their dicks. Of course, that also explains why some men don't seem capable of thinking at all.

Sort of like the old, "I'm voting for Hillary because she's a woman!" This wold be emotional thinking, not logical thinking.

It seems every bit as logical as voting for men because they are men. Which is why men get elected. Not because they are good at anything or know anything. How else does one explain Trump?

 

[Half-Life]

Apparently your mind is lead by delusion.

What gender does that make you:

This is common knowledge.

If you are equating knowledge with bigotry, it makes it much more difficult to make your case that men's minds are lead by logic.

It doesn't mean that every single female is illogical, but for the most part, women think with their emotions.

Wow. This is really like saying that men think with their dicks. Of course, that also explains why some men don't seem capable of thinking at all.

Sort of like the old, "I'm voting for Hillary because she's a woman!" This wold be emotional thinking, not logical thinking.

It seems every bit as logical as voting for men because they are men. Which is why men get elected. Not because they are good at anything or know anything. How else does one explain Trump?

Mostly every election is man vs man. You can't say, "I voted for Romney because he's a man and I did not vote for Obama because he's a man."

How stupid, right?

 

[Don2 (Don1 Revised)]

And who's oppressing them? MEN! And who else is getting oppressed? MEN!

Not quite true. There are many women who support the tenets of the "Islamic Revolution". In Iran both men and women are oppressed by ISLAM.

Yet Men's Rights Activists are busy complaining about ring girls and seeing women's boobs and rights to man spreading!

The ayatollahs and radical feminists in the West are more similar than either would ever admit, but both are really driven by the desire to control other people's lives.

What's wrong with grid/ring girls? They are consenting adults after all and get paid for it.
What's wrong with looking at boobs? I certainly won't stop because Julie Bindel and Gail Dines think it's the feminist equivalent of a deadly sin.

And manspreading is necessary when seats are too narrow.

You guys focus on really stupid stuff, like your sex life.

 

[Half-Life]

You guys focus on really stupid stuff, like your sex life.

That's what we've been saying about feminism! Can't you see?

Ring girls and manspreading are NOT things to focus on! They are stupid stuff!!

Glad you agree!

 

[ZiprHead]

Wut a load of shit.

I was always a good guy, never ever considered good looking. After I got over my adolescent shyness, I had little trouble getting women.

I never said it was every single man or every single woman.

Why do you guys always jump to absolutes?

Irony. Big fan.