• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

Pelosi: Impeachment Is Moving Forward

Yes, they have a good lawyer who got them off despite the confession that they tried to rape her and then stopped.

Even Trump sees how despicable that is.

So, getting a good lawyer is wrong? Is thst why Trump's lawyers are in jail, or Guliani?

Keith, you realize you are defending attempted rapists just to score points against Trump, right?

TDS.

There's plenty of people who still think OJ is guilty despite him being found not guilty. It would be just as despicable if someone said, "OJ is innocent. Shut up."
 
I'd rather have someone call for the death of an attempted rapist than someone saying the rapist should be let off the hook and allowed to roam free.

No one called for the rapist to be let off the hook - the five individuals were not guilty of raping Ms. Melli.

Yes, they have a good lawyer who got them off despite the confession that they tried to rape her and then stopped.

Even Trump sees how despicable that is.

So it should be easy for Republicans to see that even though Trump tried to quid pro quo Zelensky and then stopped it was still pretty despicable.
 
Yes, they have a good lawyer who got them off despite the confession that they tried to rape her and then stopped.

Even Trump sees how despicable that is.

So, getting a good lawyer is wrong? Is thst why Trump's lawyers are in jail, or Guliani?

Keith, you realize you are defending attempted rapists just to score points against Trump, right?

TDS.

There's plenty of people who still think OJ is guilty despite him being found not guilty. It would be just as despicable if someone said, "OJ is innocent. Shut up."
Did Trump deny trying to rape that woman? It would seem odd to be innocent for him not to proclaim it. Not that I think he tried to rape her, it just seems peculiar that he hasn’t spoken about it.
 
Yes, they have a good lawyer who got them off despite the confession that they tried to rape her and then stopped.

Even Trump sees how despicable that is.

So it should be easy for Republicans to see that even though Trump tried to quid pro quo Zelensky and then stopped it was still pretty despicable.

But, on one hand leftists paint Trump as some bumbling fumbling moron who can't do anything, then as a mad genius capable of masterminding a quid pro quo from foreign leaders under the radar.

It's a fascist tactic: The enemy must be completely incompetent and impossible to defeat at the same time. Classic double think.
 
Still a witch hunt. Everyone is focusing on the quid pro quo and claim that Trump was wrong because it was a favor for himself. It was not. In the transcript Trump clearly said, "Can you do US a favor?" He didn't say, "do ME a favor." He said "us."

This is why the conservatives are laughing at the witch hunt. A favor for the country is fine.

And if he said "do Trump a favor" instead of "do me a favor", what would you make of it? Is he referring to himself or would your argument be that he must be referring to another member of the Trump family? See, I think by using "us" instead of "me" is more of an illeistic manner of speaking and nothing more.
 
Yes, they have a good lawyer who got them off despite the confession that they tried to rape her and then stopped.

Even Trump sees how despicable that is.

So, getting a good lawyer is wrong? Is thst why Trump's lawyers are in jail, or Guliani?

Keith, you realize you are defending attempted rapists just to score points against Trump, right?
no, see, you would not understand but some of us value the Constitution. Took oaths to defend it.
I tend not to call for them to LOCK (him, her, them) up until they are convicted in a court. Ibtry jiit to demand the death penalty for citizens who have not been convicted of crimes that actually carry tgge death penalty.
Weird little progressive thing, i guess.
wrong again.
There's plenty of people who still think OJ is guilty despite him being found not guilty. It would be just as despicable if someone said, "OJ is innocent. Shut up."
No. Despicable is saying "they should lock OJ up."

I do think he's guilty, i think the jury wanted to punish The LAPD more than anythjng else, but i do jot call for, or demand, that he be locked up anyway. Or shot. Hung. Stabbed.

See, weirdly, again, i have to think even felons, and even convicted felons have rights. Not as many privileges, but rights.
 
Yes, they have a good lawyer who got them off despite the confession that they tried to rape her and then stopped.

Even Trump sees how despicable that is.

So it should be easy for Republicans to see that even though Trump tried to quid pro quo Zelensky and then stopped it was still pretty despicable.

But, on one hand leftists paint Trump as some bumbling fumbling moron who can't do anything, then as a mad genius capable of masterminding a quid pro quo from foreign leaders under the radar.
under the radar? He did it on NATIONAL TELEVISION!

He is no mastermind, just a moron atbthe pointy end of the GOP's domestic policy.
If he ever stops being valuable to them, he has no allies, he's toast.
 
I note you still haven't cite ten experts who think Trump's favor was perfectly legal?

Or five?

Or one? One expert, hopefully a legal expert, hopefully not compromised....
 
Keith&Co., you're asking the impossible. There is no one who can cite facts that don't exist. Trump's favor ask was illegal. So no expert thinks Trump's favor was in any respect legal. Even Gun Nut must know this else he'd have posted some random name by now.

I was watching some of the hearings and some people who took the stands under oath said, "It is not a crime" and then the Dem questioning them would get triggered and start whining.
 
Keith&Co., you're asking the impossible. There is no one who can cite facts that don't exist. Trump's favor ask was illegal. So no expert thinks Trump's favor was in any respect legal. Even Gun Nut must know this else he'd have posted some random name by now.

I was watching some of the hearings and some people who took the stands under oath said, "It is not a crime" and then the Dem questioning them would get triggered and start whining.

You know those quotes are absolutely not support for your case without context.
WHAT was each one saying 'it is not a crime'?
 
Keith&Co., you're asking the impossible. There is no one who can cite facts that don't exist. Trump's favor ask was illegal. So no expert thinks Trump's favor was in any respect legal. Even Gun Nut must know this else he'd have posted some random name by now.

Yeah, but sometimes it's amusing when Halfie pretends he can cite support....like that one up above. Pretty pathetic.
 
Keith&Co., you're asking the impossible. There is no one who can cite facts that don't exist.

...except the Son of God, William Barr.

Trump's favor ask was illegal. So no expert thinks Trump's favor was in any respect legal.

Experts are deep state scum. Ask any Trumpdindunuffin. Seems you've got a live one right here - go ahead; ask her! :D
 
Still a witch hunt. Everyone is focusing on the quid pro quo and claim that Trump was wrong because it was a favor for himself. It was not. In the transcript Trump clearly said, "Can you do US a favor?" He didn't say, "do ME a favor." He said "us."

This is why the conservatives are laughing at the witch hunt. A favor for the country is fine.
Except his campaign would have benefited. So itwas felony.

We all benefit if Biden was doing a quid pro quo. Nobody wants a corrupt Democrat running for President.

Did you see Trump sign the executive order against anti-semitism? No President in history has ever done more to protect the Jewish people than Trump.

Did you also see all the omissions and lies in the report today? Trump's winning. When you have to lie on an official report, you bet it's a witch hunt.

It's already been established that Biden didn't do a quid pro quo, so WTF are you talking about?
 
I note you still haven't cite ten experts who think Trump's favor was perfectly legal?

Or five?

Or one? One expert, hopefully a legal expert, hopefully not compromised....

Hell, even the legal expert the republicans brought in to defend trump, Jonathon Turley, didn't make the case that he didn't do it. He just complained about the process.
 
Still a witch hunt. Everyone is focusing on the quid pro quo and claim that Trump was wrong because it was a favor for himself. It was not. In the transcript Trump clearly said, "Can you do US a favor?" He didn't say, "do ME a favor." He said "us."

This is why the conservatives are laughing at the witch hunt. A favor for the country is fine.
Except his campaign would have benefited. So itwas felony.

We all benefit if Biden was doing a quid pro quo. Nobody wants a corrupt Democrat running for President.

But a corrupt Republican in the White House is ok?

Did you see Trump sign the executive order against anti-semitism? No President in history has ever done more to protect the Jewish people than Trump.

More window-dressing.

Did you also see all the omissions and lies in the report today? Trump's winning. When you have to lie on an official report, you bet it's a witch hunt.

I haven't seen the report yet but I'm sure those "omissions and lies" are in the mind of the Republicans, not in reality. Their claims have so often had so little to do with reality that I have no reason to think the current case is any different.
 
"Me" is included in "us". So, it is clearly a quid pro quo.

Nope. All experts agree a favor for the country is perfectly fine.

It's only unhinged leftists off their meds who think Trump's favor was wrong.

When he's not impeached the excuses will only get worse and the TDS will reach unfounded heights.

It's not for the country--His Flatulence wanted an announcement of the investigation. He didn't care about whether there actually was an investigation. He used government money for purely personal gain--that usually gets you time in the hoosegow.
 
Keith&Co., you're asking the impossible. There is no one who can cite facts that don't exist.

...except the Son of God, William Barr.

Trump's favor ask was illegal. So no expert thinks Trump's favor was in any respect legal.

Experts are deep state scum. Ask any Trumpdindunuffin. Seems you've got a live one right here - go ahead; ask her! :D

OK

Why does your Experts statement look so similar to that of Half Life?
I was watching some of the hearings and some people who took the stands under oath said, "It is not a crime" and then the Dem questioning them would get triggered and start whining.
 
on the one hand, I want to commend you for recognizing this, my main thesis that I brought here when I joined... on the other hand I really want to tell you TOO FUCK LITTLE TOO FUCKING LATE YOU BUNCH OF INCOMPETENT IDIOTS... but what good would that do.. get you to resign? <sigh>

You're mistaking taking the high road for being incompetent. I'm pissed off because we don't play dirty--and this screams for us to play dirty--but then that would just make us as bad as they are. If it were up to me, I'd command the army to throw Trump into a black site and no one would ever hear from him again. But, of course, that's not tenable however justifiable.

Don't fool yourself or we'll have to start calling you angelo II. Everyone plays dirty, some dirtier than others and Trumpty Dumpty simply leads the dirt parade.

When it comes to playing dirty, no one is playing dirtier than the busload of clowns otherwise known as Democrats in Congress and on the campaign trial!
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/15269/senate-unconstitutional-impeachment
 
Back
Top Bottom