Pelosi: Impeachment Is Moving Forward

[Half-Life]

Bernie isn't and wouldn't destroy democracy while sucking Putin's dick the way Bonespurs has.

Building hotels in Russia doesn't mean Trump is a puppet.

Where's the evidence? This Russian conspiracy thing is insane.

Now you want to see the evidence!?!



Hypocrisy, thy name is Half-Life.

Did you miss my post #2,448?

Republicans wanted the whistleblower to testify. The Dems said no.

We don't even know who the whistleblower is! How can you even have a fair trial when the whistleblower himself refuses to say who he is. Is he deathly afraid of Trump, too?

 

[ZiprHead]

Now you want to see the evidence!?!



Hypocrisy, thy name is Half-Life.

Did you miss my post #2,448?

Republicans wanted the whistleblower to testify. The Dems said no.

We don't even know who the whistleblower is! How can you even have a fair trial when the whistleblower himself refuses to say who he is. Is he deathly afraid of Trump, too?

Revealing the whistleblower's identity is against the law. The Republicans asked for something that cannot be given because they knew simple minded Trump supporters would find the argument compelling.

Everything the WB claimed has been backed up by the testimony of others. The only purpose of putting the WB on the stand would be to attack his/her character.

 

[Half-Life]

Now you want to see the evidence!?!



Hypocrisy, thy name is Half-Life.

Did you miss my post #2,448?

Republicans wanted the whistleblower to testify. The Dems said no.

We don't even know who the whistleblower is! How can you even have a fair trial when the whistleblower himself refuses to say who he is. Is he deathly afraid of Trump, too?

Revealing the whistleblower's identity is against the law. The Republicans asked for something that cannot be given because they knew simple minded Trump supporters would find the argument compelling.

Everything the WB claimed has been backed up by the testimony of others. The only purpose of putting the WB on the stand would be to attack his/her character.

It's against the law for the whistleblower himself to say who he is?

He must not have a compelling case. If I uncovered this type of corruption I would be singing to the Heavens and demanding to testify. I wouldn't sit back shaking in fear of some President that everyone says is a "goofball."

 

[zorq]

Trump only has executive privelidge while he is the executive. All the hidden dirt is coming out eventually.... unless Trump and the GOP succeed in completely destroying American democracy by crowning him president for life. I wouldn't put it beneath them.

What hidden dirt?

Remember when ... [unrelated made up nonsense]

If there is no hidden dirt then Trump wouldn't be trying so hard to hide it. Bill Clinton turned over 90,000 documents when he was impeached. Trump won't turn any over.

Even when he promises transparency he goes back on his word. Ask him about his "beautiful" tax returns he promised to show everyone when he was campaigning in 2016.

 

[Half-Life]

Trump only has executive privelidge while he is the executive. All the hidden dirt is coming out eventually.... unless Trump and the GOP succeed in completely destroying American democracy by crowning him president for life. I wouldn't put it beneath them.

What hidden dirt?

Remember when ... [unrelated made up nonsense]

If there is no hidden dirt then Trump wouldn't be trying so hard to hide it. Bill Clinton turned over 90,000 documents when he was impeached. Trump won't turn any over.

Even when he promises transparency he goes back on his word. Ask him about his "beautiful" tax returns he promised to show everyone when he was campaigning in 2016.

And if he turned those over and those showed nothing, Dems would move onto the next smoking guns. They claimed to have about 15 smoking guns against Trump. Turns out the gun was frozen in ice.

Face it, the Dems would be in muhc better shape if they never got the Trump Derangement Syndrome and just accepted the loss like men and moved on. From the very second they lost, it was "conspiracy this!, conspiracy that!" They just can't accept the fact they lost fair and square to Trump.

Trump campaigned for the electoral college. Hilary did not. Maybe if the Dems focused on the actual system we have and campaigned accordingly, they would have a better chance. Trump won 30 states to Hillary's 20. Bernie needs to get about 11 states that voted for Trump to switch to Bernie.

 

[ZiprHead]

If there is no hidden dirt then Trump wouldn't be trying so hard to hide it. Bill Clinton turned over 90,000 documents when he was impeached. Trump won't turn any over.

Even when he promises transparency he goes back on his word. Ask him about his "beautiful" tax returns he promised to show everyone when he was campaigning in 2016.

And if he turned those over and those showed nothing, Dems would move onto the next smoking guns.

That sounds a lot more like Republicans. Remember Whitewater? They found nothing but kept digging for three years until they found a blow job.

 

[Half-Life]

If there is no hidden dirt then Trump wouldn't be trying so hard to hide it. Bill Clinton turned over 90,000 documents when he was impeached. Trump won't turn any over.

Even when he promises transparency he goes back on his word. Ask him about his "beautiful" tax returns he promised to show everyone when he was campaigning in 2016.

And if he turned those over and those showed nothing, Dems would move onto the next smoking guns.

That sounds a lot more like Republicans. Remember Whitewater? They found nothing but kept digging for three years until they found a blow job.

And you guys were against all that digging and probing. Yet, now you do the same for Trump.

 

[Patooka]

Face it, the Dems would be in muhc better shape if they never got the Trump Derangement Syndrome and just accepted the loss like men and moved on. From the very second they lost, it was "conspiracy this!, conspiracy that!" They just can't accept the fact they lost fair and square to Trump.

This has to be the most pathetic argument so far. For the last fucking time, in order for Trump to be impeached the dems would have to agree that he won the election. They just don't believe that winning an election gives you four years of complete immunity. Most people agree with this. That you can't is obvious, unsurprising and typical all rolled into a sad package.

The fact that not a single Trump supporter has been able to provide a single consistent coherent argument pretty much shows how this will be viewed in years to come. I just hope Trumps' toadstool cock pressing the back of you throat was worth it all.

 

[ZiprHead]

That sounds a lot more like Republicans. Remember Whitewater? They found nothing but kept digging for three years until they found a blow job.

And you guys were against all that digging and probing. Yet, now you do the same for Trump.

You don't think bribery and collusion with foreign powers to manipulate the US election process are a little more important than a blowjob?

 

[Half-Life]

That sounds a lot more like Republicans. Remember Whitewater? They found nothing but kept digging for three years until they found a blow job.

And you guys were against all that digging and probing. Yet, now you do the same for Trump.

You don't think bribery and collusion with foreign powers to manipulate the US election process are a little more important than a blowjob?

No evidence was shown in the impeachment trial for this. Just wild claims of, "We know he did it!"

They can't show which votes were changed, how the votes were changed, who changed the votes. Nothing.

 

[Half-Life]

Face it, the Dems would be in muhc better shape if they never got the Trump Derangement Syndrome and just accepted the loss like men and moved on. From the very second they lost, it was "conspiracy this!, conspiracy that!" They just can't accept the fact they lost fair and square to Trump.

This has to be the most pathetic argument so far. For the last fucking time, in order for Trump to be impeached the dems would have to agree that he won the election. They just don't believe that winning an election gives you four years of complete immunity. Most people agree with this. That you can't is obvious, unsurprising and typical all rolled into a sad package.

The fact that not a single Trump supporter has been able to provide a single consistent coherent argument pretty much shows how this will be viewed in years to come. I just hope Trumps' toadstool cock pressing the back of you throat was worth it all.

Please refrain from the homophobic slurs.

 

[Patooka]

That sounds a lot more like Republicans. Remember Whitewater? They found nothing but kept digging for three years until they found a blow job.

And you guys were against all that digging and probing. Yet, now you do the same for Trump.

Because Trump warrants it. So your whataboutism isn't even remotely equivalent. Answer me this; since Trump became President how many of his former associates are now in jail? How many are currently under investigation? How many are currently indicted?

Maybe we should try something simple. Why do you provide unequivocal support towards the most corrupt administration you country has ever experienced?

 

[ZiprHead]

You don't think bribery and collusion with foreign powers to manipulate the US election process are a little more important than a blowjob?

No evidence was shown in the impeachment trial for this. Just wild claims of, "We know he did it!"

They can't show which votes were changed, how the votes were changed, who changed the votes. Nothing.

Willful ignorance is not a becoming trait in an adult.

 

[ZiprHead]

Face it, the Dems would be in muhc better shape if they never got the Trump Derangement Syndrome and just accepted the loss like men and moved on. From the very second they lost, it was "conspiracy this!, conspiracy that!" They just can't accept the fact they lost fair and square to Trump.

This has to be the most pathetic argument so far. For the last fucking time, in order for Trump to be impeached the dems would have to agree that he won the election. They just don't believe that winning an election gives you four years of complete immunity. Most people agree with this. That you can't is obvious, unsurprising and typical all rolled into a sad package.

The fact that not a single Trump supporter has been able to provide a single consistent coherent argument pretty much shows how this will be viewed in years to come. I just hope Trumps' toadstool cock pressing the back of you throat was worth it all.

Please refrain from the homophobic slurs.

You don't have to be gay to enjoy sucking Bonespur's dick. Republican prove that daily.

Also, dodge noted.

 

[Half-Life]

That sounds a lot more like Republicans. Remember Whitewater? They found nothing but kept digging for three years until they found a blow job.

And you guys were against all that digging and probing. Yet, now you do the same for Trump.

Because Trump warrants it. So your whataboutism isn't even remotely equivalent. Answer me this; since Trump became President how many of his former associates are now in jail? How many are currently under investigation? How many are currently indicted?

Maybe we should try something simple. Why do you provide unequivocal support towards the most corrupt administration you country has ever experienced?

We Republicans believe that was the Obama administration.

See? Answers like ours don't make you turn on Obama, and answers like yours against Trump don't make us turn against Trump.

 

[Patooka]

Because Trump warrants it. So your whataboutism isn't even remotely equivalent. Answer me this; since Trump became President how many of his former associates are now in jail? How many are currently under investigation? How many are currently indicted?

Maybe we should try something simple. Why do you provide unequivocal support towards the most corrupt administration you country has ever experienced?

We Republicans believe that was the Obama administration.

See? Answers like ours don't make you turn on Obama, and answers like yours against Trump don't make us turn against Trump.

Fine, let's turn my questions around:
Since Obama became President how many of his former associates are now in jail? Zero
How many are currently under investigation? Zero
How many are currently indicted? Zero
Why do you provide unequivocal support towards the Obama Administration? I didn't, but thanks for playing.

Are you going to answer my questions properly now, or are you going to skip and jump and skirt around the issue like a contemporary Baryshnikov? Incidentally, that isn't being homophobic - it's simply using analogies correctly.

 

[Keith&Co.]

The problem with your Weinstein comparison is that if they went to trial and said, "We have enough evidence to convict Harvey. We're ready for trial," and then during the trial they said, "No wait! We need more witnesses!," it wouldn't fly.

they STILL never said 'wait,' that's a mistruth.
You're still pretending they did not list the documents they wanted and the witnesses they wanted before the trial started. The ones Trump kept from the House.
You know, the obstruction?

What? Republicans wanted the whistleblower to testify. The Dems said no.

actually, the law says no.

We don't even know who the whistleblower is!

as the law directs

How can you even have a fair trial when the whistleblower himself refuses to say who he is. Is he deathly afraid of Trump, too?

he's certainly afraid of Trump supporters....

But hiw would the WB's identity matter?
He is not the accuser. He merely reported something he felt needed investigation.
There was an investigation.
The investigators filed charges.
The whistlenblower has no part in tge prosecution.

 

[Keith&Co.]

View attachment 25924

AND IF YOU DON'T HAVE ANY, PLEASE GO AHEAD AND MANUFACTURE SOME!

My guess is even if they try, they won't find anything.

find? What part of 'manufacture' confuses you?

You really think the Republicans would acquit Trump just so all the dirt can come out on him?

more dirt came out after the vote on witnesses.

Trump's not that dumb, guys. He's always one step ahead of your thinking.

Except he's not. Dirt continues to accrue.
The GOP is no longer pretending he is innocent, they insist his guilt is not sufficient to convict.
How are you missing this?
Oh. Because FOX only deals with (snicker) "facts."

 

[Keith&Co.]

View attachment 25925

I've seen some Bernie Bros. on youtube say, "If Bernie does a good job, I wouldn't mind abolishing term limits and essentially making him a benevolent dictator. It's a lot better than any other option we have. Once Bernie's out of office, the next President will just bring us back to capitalism again. It would be a waste of effort by Bernie."

Don't get mad at Republicans for saying the same things about Trump.

I have seen Trump supporters saying Trump supports their white supremacy.
Does tgsst make it true of Trump?

 

[Keith&Co.]

A more apt analogy (which Halfie will never admit is happening) is if - before the trial had even begun - the judge and jurors stated "we've been working very hard with Mr. Weinstein's attorneys and Mr. Weinstein himself to make absolutely sure we'll all be on the same page. We've decided that he's going to be acquitted of all charges. Yes, we know he raped those women, but we're fans of all of his movies and...to be honest...we think those bitches had it coming."

Then the prosecutors come in and say "we've got four more accusers who have physical evidence and corroborating testimony which proves the defendant assaulted them." To which the judge says "sorry, we're not going to allow those new witnesses. Or any witnesses. Or any evidence. Or any documents. Did you not hear us the first time? We are going to acquit him, no matter what."

If the Dems didn't have enough witnesses, why did they impeach him in the house? They had all the evidene they needed in the House, but in the Senate they need more evidence?

Face it, the Dems blew it. They shot themselves in the foot and then asked, "Why can't we run fast?"

Jeez, this lie is getting tiresome.