• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

Forgery suspect killed by cop restricting his airway

Why are protesters attacked for objecting
Do you think actions such as throwing objects (including Molotov cocktails) at police, mowing police down with vehicles (like in Buffalo and Atlanta), looting stores, setting buildings on fire etc. are acceptable forms of "objecting"?

Do you think kneeling on the neck of a man suspected of a non-violent crime of trivial monetary value, begging for air for almost 9 minutes, 3 of which he was unconscious is acceptable policing?

How much property is an even exchange for your life?
 
Do you think kneeling on the neck of a man suspected of a non-violent crime of trivial monetary value
No. It is a violet crime. It's just not murder.

But how about you answer my question for a change.
Do you think actions such as throwing objects (including Molotov cocktails) at police, mowing police down with vehicles (like in Buffalo and Atlanta), shooting police officers in the head (as happened in Las Vegas), looting stores, setting buildings on fire etc. are acceptable forms of "objecting"?

How much property is an even exchange for your life?
A non sequitur. Property damage and violence against police officers is not a justifiable form of "protest".
 
"Protester" shot a police officer in Las Vegas:

Las Vegas shootings following Monday protest leave officer in 'grave condition,' man dead

Fox 5 said:
Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Sheriff Joe Lombardo said an officer was in "grave condition" after being shot on the Strip, and that another man was dead in a separate shooting, both following protests in the area Monday night. [...]As Metro made attempts to disperse a crowd in the area around 11:30 p.m., Lombardo said the officers took rocks and bottles from the crowd. While attempting to place several people in custody, he said a shot rang out and the officer was down. The suspect was identified later in the night and was taken into custody by SWAT and K9 officers.

But you know, it's all good as long as you are "protesting". :rolleyes:
 
A non sequitur

A microcosm.

Show where people are trying to justify violence as protest. Only the white supremacists are playing this word game.

Here's some protesters. Ask them your question:

uMR7F9C.png
 
Show where people are trying to justify violence as protest. Only the white supremacists are playing this word game.
Toni implicitly did justify at least the anti-property violence (looting, arson etc.)
Toni said:
How much property is an even exchange for your life?
Are you calling Toni a "white supremacist"?

Left wing radicals in general support killing police officers though.
Take her as an example:
5675cd0273de5.image.jpg
She is not some "white supremacist" but a leftist Occupy Oakland participant.

Black Lives Matter radicals in New York and Minnesota have also called for lethal violence against cops as early as 2014 and 2015, respectively.
 
[YOUTUBE]https://youtu.be/LOdXv_gIEL8[/YOUTUBE]
Causes a guy in his 60s (from appearances) to fall down by shoving him... and then just stands around while another officer appears to walk over to help him up, then walks in to force the guy to get up. What an asshole. If that is how you treat people in their 60s, you need some more training... or to be fired.
 
Do you think kneeling on the neck of a man suspected of a non-violent crime of trivial monetary value
No. It is a violet crime. It's just not murder.

I guess that will be for a jury to decide.

But how about you answer my question for a change.
Do you think actions such as throwing objects (including Molotov cocktails) at police, mowing police down with vehicles (like in Buffalo and Atlanta), shooting police officers in the head (as happened in Las Vegas), looting stores, setting buildings on fire etc. are acceptable forms of "objecting"?

I think it's predictable. For one thing, it is known that a small number of people in Minneapolis and I suspect other cities as well started the violence and destruction. Not peaceful protesters. Perhaps off duty police officers, although St. Paul has denied that the man recorded breaking the first windows is a police officer. Definitely people from out of state who began the destruction. Definitely people driving into neighborhoods, changing their out of state license plates for Minnesota plates--I know this for an absolute fact.

These are not just protests. They are out pourings of profound grief. One of the stages of grief is anger, according to Kubler Ross. But since ancient times, people have engaged in rending their garments (Keriah) and other destructive and self destructive acts as extreme expressions of grief.

Or seen another way: The state sanctioned officers who are charged with serving and protecting the people instead took George Floyd's life--and the lives of too many other innocent, unarmed people. The state, through it's police officers, violated the social contract. Protest, destruction of property, and even violence is a logical response, even if we abhor the destruction of property and the violence.

How much property is an even exchange for your life?
A non sequitur. Property damage and violence against police officers is not a justifiable form of "protest".

It's not a non sequitor. If the police can kill a man in broad daylight, in front of people begging them to stop, recording them killing the man, then any one of us can be the person on the ground, a knee in our neck.

Why is one man's life worth less than $20 and yours worth more? After all, you engage in criminal activity. I realize that you view your particular criminal activity as being 'victimless' and activity that should not be illegal but still, it is criminal activity. I'm not writing this to criticize your activities. I'm trying to get you to realize that this could be YOU. It should not be you. It should not have been George Floyd. Or Filandro Castile. Or Tamir Rice. or any of the men, women and children murdered by police. It shouldn't be any of us.

Murder is not a justified police action.
 
Show where people are trying to justify violence as protest. Only the white supremacists are playing this word game.
Toni implicitly did justify at least the anti-property violence (looting, arson etc.)
Toni said:
How much property is an even exchange for your life?
Are you calling Toni a "white supremacist"?

Left wing radicals in general support killing police officers though.
Take her as an example:

So no you can't.

Instead you play pretend, then deflect to 'left wing radicals in general'?

You keep making specific accusations without specific support. Can I start putting words in your mouth? You ready to let the right-wing-radicals-in-general speak for you?
 
Lancaster officials say group of armed, white men infiltrated protests, instigated violence Sunday

Police Chief Jarrad Berkihiser told reporters police observed white men wearing body armor, some with guns on hips.

"We also saw definite evidence that we believe white nationalist groups were here," Berkihiser said. "Any time my officers were pelted with rocks or water bottles filled with cayenne pepper, it was coming from Caucasian individuals in the crowd."

There were between five and 15 agitators, all white men in their late 20s and early 30s, according to Sorace, who said a state police video system is being used to review footage and identify the agitators.
 
Lancaster officials say group of armed, white men infiltrated protests, instigated violence Sunday

Police Chief Jarrad Berkihiser told reporters police observed white men wearing body armor, some with guns on hips.

"We also saw definite evidence that we believe white nationalist groups were here," Berkihiser said. "Any time my officers were pelted with rocks or water bottles filled with cayenne pepper, it was coming from Caucasian individuals in the crowd."

There were between five and 15 agitators, all white men in their late 20s and early 30s, according to Sorace, who said a state police video system is being used to review footage and identify the agitators.

It’s so bizarre how the media just can’t say Antifa. Must. Stick. With. Narrative.
 
Lancaster officials say group of armed, white men infiltrated protests, instigated violence Sunday

Police Chief Jarrad Berkihiser told reporters police observed white men wearing body armor, some with guns on hips.

"We also saw definite evidence that we believe white nationalist groups were here," Berkihiser said. "Any time my officers were pelted with rocks or water bottles filled with cayenne pepper, it was coming from Caucasian individuals in the crowd."

There were between five and 15 agitators, all white men in their late 20s and early 30s, according to Sorace, who said a state police video system is being used to review footage and identify the agitators.

It’s so bizarre how the media just can’t say Antifa. Must. Stick. With. Narrative.

That's not the media saying it's white nationalists, it's the chief of police. Reading comprehension is a good thing.
 
What I find fascinating is that the "law and order" crowd are focusing on the relatively small number of looters and rioters of any ideological persuasion instead of the clear lesson that this tragedy struck a real chord across the USA. It should be obvious that the police have an image problem. It doesn't matter whether the image is earned or not at this point.

So, instead of pointing out that looting is bad (duh) or that rioting is bad (duh) or blaming ___(you fill in the blank) for the image problem, concentrate on the real problem: police behavior and community relations.
 
Back
Top Bottom