But you continued with this…..
…..which is your philosophy. Absolute truth can only be found in mathematics and logic.
I know this is beyond your pay grade, but there it is in short.
Fun.
In contrast Christians clam absolute knowledge derived from ancient texts of unknown authors.
I’m not claiming absolute truth. And my presented argument does not depend ancient scriptures other than the description of God. The argument is from universe to God’s existence …no scripture.
Science hs no belifs as you infer. Some may have personal belief, ome may not.
Didn't infer that at all.
Science clams no absolute truth or knowledge. Any theory is subject to revision at any time.
Good philosophy.
The practice of science is a process independent of beliefs, Newton was a Christian as was Galileo. The majority of scientists leading up to the 20th century were Christian.
The process of science is a philosophical structure.
The scientific process rooted in the brain is not much different than how we do most things.
Good philosophy.
Oberve, hypothesize, test hypothesize. reject, or modify and retest.
Good philosophy.
We observe the sky color, smell, and feel of the air and can sense when rain may be imminent.
Snore…
Science is more formal and is based on numerical quantification of variables, measurement, and mathematical models IOW equations.
More than its philosophical foundations?
We all do science but do not call it that. Science is a structured and formal practice of what we all do naturally.
Specialized reasoning process.
People figured out how to spin stabilize arrows with feathers without any math or instruments.
No math?
Romans and Egyptians were great engineers and builders without any of what we call sconce today.
The labeled process of science was not present, but the natural reasoning you just called science was. So what is your point?
Other post…….
Moogly is the poster you quoted me responding to. Keep up.
And
YOU can’t possibly be sneering about a harmless spelling error. Seriously YOU? Look above. The act of reading your numerous misspellings has turned into an art form. But fun.
You are one of those who insists science is all wrong and does not get it, yet des not hesitate to get on jet and fly somewhere.
Ridiculous. Where could you possibly think I oppose science? I presented science as evidence that supports theism.
Read post 126 by Rhea. Who is she questioning?
Look at post 83 where I addressed Moogly misunderstanding of the First Law of Thermodynamics. Could you follow that one?
Look in your other thread where I scientifically shredded skepticalbip’s oscillation model. Post 44….
https://talkfreethought.org/showthread.php?21708-If-You-Are-Certain-God-Exists-Why-Prove-It/page5 .. Did you understand that one?
So please stop all this emoting that I oppose science. It looks bad on you.