• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

I'm a Fascist. Am I welcome here?

I love you. Mussolini loves you.

Nobody chooses their color.

Mussolini was a dark Mediterranean Italian who wasn't part of Hitler's master race.

The Roman Empire he was trying to resurrect included North Africa.

I have nothing against what a black person looks like. Have you encountered racism? I have too.

Ya know what. You seem like your hearts in the right place, you just give too much importance to roll models. How's about you learn to love what's left of yourself that is NOT under the influence of Mussolini then get back to me.

Like, I don't get how he doesn't understand that the primary point of contention we have is with their desire to enforce their (theocratic) model of propriety on society, and to invalidate the goals and identities of people who are merely just living their lives harmlessly and joyfully.

Further, perhaps, is his worship of a form of government that makes itself pointedly vulnerable to all the flaws any single ruler may have, and the instabilities over time arising from a turnstile of such flawed humans. It looks great on paper the same way communism does, but in reality it has too many points of failure, either be it in the points of failure exposed and leveraged out of the singular dictator or the points of failure as control slips to oligarchy, with fascism and communism respectively. When you mix the two you end up with something like Russia: a broken economy owned by oligarchs where the bearings will continue until morale improves.

In reality, a combination of self-rule and socialism based on a more reasonable schema of ownership (where the leverage of personal gain against "I own it" means that ownership transfers, commensurate with the force of leverage applied, to those leveraged against): the use of leverage for personal gain ought be an act of implicit sale.
 
Now by Fascist I don't mean racist. There have been Fascists of every ethnicity. Even before the word "Fascism" existed, the Israelites practiced Fascism in the Old Testament.

Current day Vatican City State was founded by Benito Mussolini and is an absolute monarchy, absolute Theocracy, with a chief Prophet and Shepherd who defines infallible Dogmas all Catholics are bound to believe. It is truly a Fascist state, and the symbol for the Knights of Columbus, the largest organization in Catholicism, is the "Fasces" the symbol of Fascism.

Fascism is intrinsically peaceful in it's essence and nature. Christianity and Islam are not intrinsically peaceful, because the Bible and Koran are extremely violent books. The Doctrine of Fascism is the definition of Fascism and the Fascist Catechism or Scriptures. It is very peaceful in comparison, with one possible exception, which is a call for all Fascists to defend God as Bolsheviks , communists, and radical atheists seek to efface God from the hearts of man.

I love Fascism because it is more intrinsically spiritual and religious than Democracy. In fact, Mussolini said, "Fascism is a Religion".



I venerate Mussolini like he is a Saint, but I believe he did much time in purgatory.

The images attached to this post are the prayer walls of my apartment.

If I'm not allowed at your forum please let me know a good fit. Storm front is terrible because they are racist, and Fascism isn't racist.

God bless!


Welcome. Interesting video. If that's the best defence of Fascism you can find, I'm not impressed. The point of politics is to create a system of incentives and nudges that make society better. Fascism leads to corruption wasted resources. Much like Communism. All authoriatarian regimes have very predictable outcomes. It's interesting he tries to argue that Mussolini was a victim of circumstances. I think it's amazing Italian fascism, and his shit show of a regime, lasted as long as it did. It's was dysfunctional to the extreme. And I think the ideology and basic theory is the problem, not Mussolini the person. Anybody in his position would sooner or later have fucked it up.
 
<< snip >>​

If I'm not allowed at your forum please let me know a good fit. Storm front is terrible because they are racist, and Fascism isn't racist.

God bless!

You are welcome here. But you have to understand that most of the people on this forum are atheists and moderate to liberal, I am not sure how a happy fascist and theocrat will fit in. Certainly, you will probably not see a lot of support for these views here. If this doesn't bother you, you will fit in, at least in this political section, which is the only one I am in and know.
[MENTION=377]Jarhyn[/MENTION]; was closer than he knew in post #104.
Tom

I for one will not welcome a fascist. That's just absurd, lol.

i am under the thumb of my sainted grandmother to always be polite, even to fault.
 
Not a rebuttal--that's going to make unhappy couples and it's generally bad for the children to be in such an environment.



Which has nothing to do with the issue of premarital sex.

The filth in American entertainment industry creates savages. In Fascist Italy you wouldn't even hear " Fuck" on the radio or media. Pornography was illegal and hard to come by creating fewer perverts and men without self control.

"Fuck" harms nobody. And you missed the point--less pornography means more sex crimes.

Yes, I know, Mussolini had many mistresses , but he had relationship with them, took them nice places, made their dreams come true, and inspired such loyalty in some of them that Clara Petacci remained true to him when his male followers turned on him, and she died shielding the Duce from bullets. But yeah...Mussolini should have been faithful to his wife lol. Every saint is a sinner.

In other words, one rule for the leaders, another for the peons.

Fascism taught men discipline, exercise, love for suffering, chivalry, penance, and prayer. A lot better than what our culture teaches as a general rule.

Love for suffering? And you were talking about creating perverts? That's a formula for creating them!

And prayer doesn't actually improve things.

Pornography creates perverts who will want to act out their fantasies. Don't act like it wasn't safer in America when porn was illegal and that porn doesn't have a role to play.

No need to act--it wasn't. The actual rate of physical sex crimes (I'm not counting charges for the mere possession of illegal material, only crimes where someone is actually hurt) is way down. It's just the reporting is way up.

It's pointless even talking to you. I was in a leftist liberal household exposed to it age 8 and it fucked up my mind.

If you were being actively shown it at age 8 I wouldn't be surprised--that's the hallmark of a sexual predator. Incidental encounters with it aren't going to harm a kid but before puberty most everyone is going to find it yucky and not of interest. (Beyond the playing-doctor level of seeing what the other's anatomy looks like.)

Prayer can help certain problems but I confess, it doesn't clean my apartment.

It helps you feel better, it doesn't change the actual situation.
 
By SJW do you guys mean "social justice warrior" or Jehovah's witness?

I've heard SJW used as both is all.

Huh? Jehovah's witnesses are JW or JWs for the plural. Social Justice Warriors are SJW or SJWs for the plural. I have never seen SJW used for Jehovah's witnesses.
 
Not a rebuttal--that's going to make unhappy couples and it's generally bad for the children to be in such an environment.



Which has nothing to do with the issue of premarital sex.



"Fuck" harms nobody. And you missed the point--less pornography means more sex crimes.

Yes, I know, Mussolini had many mistresses , but he had relationship with them, took them nice places, made their dreams come true, and inspired such loyalty in some of them that Clara Petacci remained true to him when his male followers turned on him, and she died shielding the Duce from bullets. But yeah...Mussolini should have been faithful to his wife lol. Every saint is a sinner.

In other words, one rule for the leaders, another for the peons.

Fascism taught men discipline, exercise, love for suffering, chivalry, penance, and prayer. A lot better than what our culture teaches as a general rule.

Love for suffering? And you were talking about creating perverts? That's a formula for creating them!

And prayer doesn't actually improve things.

Pornography creates perverts who will want to act out their fantasies. Don't act like it wasn't safer in America when porn was illegal and that porn doesn't have a role to play.

No need to act--it wasn't. The actual rate of physical sex crimes (I'm not counting charges for the mere possession of illegal material, only crimes where someone is actually hurt) is way down. It's just the reporting is way up.

It's pointless even talking to you. I was in a leftist liberal household exposed to it age 8 and it fucked up my mind.

If you were being actively shown it at age 8 I wouldn't be surprised--that's the hallmark of a sexual predator. Incidental encounters with it aren't going to harm a kid but before puberty most everyone is going to find it yucky and not of interest. (Beyond the playing-doctor level of seeing what the other's anatomy looks like.)

Prayer can help certain problems but I confess, it doesn't clean my apartment.

It helps you feel better, it doesn't change the actual situation.

Holy shit. I'll admit I often catch up to fast burning dumpster fires like this by reviewing the recent quote chains but holy shit.

Apparently this <deleted> has never heard of age-play/ABDL/cub? There's literally an entire community of fetishists who use porn (art, not pictures) and adult roleplaying so as to NOT involve nonconsenting parties. Same with rape play. I have friends whose sexual interests extend to roleplaying getting eaten, like cut apart, eaten, dissolved in acid, and turned into a pile of shit.

In fact by making communities of such interests, and focusing those communities on harm reduction via pornography and RP, you make the violaters that much more visible because the community can, and will, identify and name and keep a very close eye on people engaging in any activity that could make them look bad.

Urge/drive redirection and harm reduction: because you can't make someone not want to engage in their sexual interests by depriving them of outlets. That's not how drives work. All denying a drive does is building the drive pressure and increasing the likelihood of catastrophic decision making.

TL;DR: if fapping before a date is an effective way to be less of an awful and unlivable hornball during the date then fapping is ALSO a good way of not being an awful and unlivable hornball in other aspects of life.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Apparently this <deleted> has never heard of age-play/ABDL/cub? There's literally an entire community of fetishists who use porn (art, not pictures) and adult roleplaying so as to NOT involve nonconsenting parties. Same with rape play. I have friends whose sexual interests extend to roleplaying getting eaten, like cut apart, eaten, dissolved in acid, and turned into a pile of shit.

While I agree with your basic idea I don't think ABDL belongs in that group--isn't that about people who want to be treated like babies, not people who want to be with babies? I don't even know what "cub" is in this context, the rest of it I agree with. I can't say I know anyone remotely that far out but so long as they are actually consenting adults I don't give a hoot what they pretend to be.
 
Pornography creates perverts who will want to act out their fantasies. Don't act like it wasn't safer in America when porn was illegal and that porn doesn't have a role to play.

That's not true. It's the reverse. If you cover women up and ban porn you get more violent sex crimes. Which is supported by statistics. In every society that liberalizes sexuality sex crimes fall.

Don't confuse visibility with occurrence. I've had a lot of sex with women around the world. The most perverse and kinky are women who grew up in Catholic countries and Muslim countries. All that sexual moralization mess with their heads and make them sex freaks given the first opportunity.

If you force everyone to cover up and not have sex you have guaranteed that people will think of little else all day. Give them free access to porn and they will likely get more productive hobbies. I'm not the only one who has drawn this conclusion.

I understand where your idea comes from. It's using the metaphor of disease on ideas. It's the sane stupid, idea that rules the West today where they think if they hear ideas they disagree with they risk turning evil.

Its also narcissistic. You are presumably aware that you aren't affected by porn this way. You've seen it yet have rejected it. But you think you are special. It's the other people who are to weak to resist. No, you are not special. Other people are also capable of it.

I used to love porn. I hot bored with it. Now I don't watch porn. For me sexuality is, about human connection. This is something porn taught me. So I still think its, good for society
 
I love you. Mussolini loves you.

Nobody chooses their color.

Mussolini was a dark Mediterranean Italian who wasn't part of Hitler's master race.

The Roman Empire he was trying to resurrect included North Africa.

I have nothing against what a black person looks like. Have you encountered racism? I have too.

Ya know what. You seem like your hearts in the right place, you just give too much importance to roll models. How's about you learn to love what's left of yourself that is NOT under the influence of Mussolini then get back to me.

I don't know. It's complicated. I believe Mussolini to be a new creation, like a caterpillar becomes a butterfly and doesn't resemble it's former self.

A caterpillar hangs upside down dead like Mussolini hung by his heels upside down, and everything gets ugly and is over for the caterpillar. Then it becomes a new creation with wings. I truly believe Benito to be a new creation, so that is who I venerate.

Regarding myself, I go to rehab soon. I need to combat a speed problem. I have been a sick man, but Fascism brought me a long ways, especially the emphasis on praying to the dead.

You take care now! Don't ever let someone of another ethnicity tell you they are better than you. God bless!
 
Pornography creates perverts who will want to act out their fantasies. Don't act like it wasn't safer in America when porn was illegal and that porn doesn't have a role to play.

That's not true. It's the reverse. If you cover women up and ban porn you get more violent sex crimes. Which is supported by statistics. In every society that liberalizes sexuality sex crimes fall.

Don't confuse visibility with occurrence. I've had a lot of sex with women around the world. The most perverse and kinky are women who grew up in Catholic countries and Muslim countries. All that sexual moralization mess with their heads and make them sex freaks given the first opportunity.

If you force everyone to cover up and not have sex you have guaranteed that people will think of little else all day. Give them free access to porn and they will likely get more productive hobbies. I'm not the only one who has drawn this conclusion.

I understand where your idea comes from. It's using the metaphor of disease on ideas. It's the sane stupid, idea that rules the West today where they think if they hear ideas they disagree with they risk turning evil.

Its also narcissistic. You are presumably aware that you aren't affected by porn this way. You've seen it yet have rejected it. But you think you are special. It's the other people who are to weak to resist. No, you are not special. Other people are also capable of it.

I used to love porn. I hot bored with it. Now I don't watch porn. For me sexuality is, about human connection. This is something porn taught me. So I still think its, good for society

When America had censorship laws we weren't the serial killer capitol of earth. In fact, back in Bob Hope's younger days, when you didn't even hear "fuck" on TV or the radio, I don't recall serial killers in America, which is remarkable because I used to read an encyclopedia of Serial killers. I can't think of one back then but I'm probably wrong.

Why did I read an encyclopedia of Serial killers?

I grew up in a leftist liberal household with porn readily available. I was exposed to porn age 8. I wasn't a sexual pervert prior to that.

Immediately I became obsessed with objectifying, disrespecting, and degrading women. A year later I was having violent fantasies. By age ten I was having serial killer fantasies.

By age 12 I was a sociopath with a criminal record (though I have never committed a sexual offense, in my heart I was a mass murderer. I am without a doubt pornography was what fucked me up because of how quickly I became perverted right after exposure to it, and how innocent I was prior to that.)
 
Now by Fascist I don't mean racist. There have been Fascists of every ethnicity. Even before the word "Fascism" existed, the Israelites practiced Fascism in the Old Testament.

Current day Vatican City State was founded by Benito Mussolini and is an absolute monarchy, absolute Theocracy, with a chief Prophet and Shepherd who defines infallible Dogmas all Catholics are bound to believe. It is truly a Fascist state, and the symbol for the Knights of Columbus, the largest organization in Catholicism, is the "Fasces" the symbol of Fascism.

Fascism is intrinsically peaceful in it's essence and nature. Christianity and Islam are not intrinsically peaceful, because the Bible and Koran are extremely violent books. The Doctrine of Fascism is the definition of Fascism and the Fascist Catechism or Scriptures. It is very peaceful in comparison, with one possible exception, which is a call for all Fascists to defend God as Bolsheviks , communists, and radical atheists seek to efface God from the hearts of man.

I love Fascism because it is more intrinsically spiritual and religious than Democracy. In fact, Mussolini said, "Fascism is a Religion".



I venerate Mussolini like he is a Saint, but I believe he did much time in purgatory.

The images attached to this post are the prayer walls of my apartment.

If I'm not allowed at your forum please let me know a good fit. Storm front is terrible because they are racist, and Fascism isn't racist.

God bless!


Welcome. Interesting video. If that's the best defence of Fascism you can find, I'm not impressed. The point of politics is to create a system of incentives and nudges that make society better. Fascism leads to corruption wasted resources. Much like Communism. All authoriatarian regimes have very predictable outcomes. It's interesting he tries to argue that Mussolini was a victim of circumstances. I think it's amazing Italian fascism, and his shit show of a regime, lasted as long as it did. It's was dysfunctional to the extreme. And I think the ideology and basic theory is the problem, not Mussolini the person. Anybody in his position would sooner or later have fucked it up.


I'm saying I believe the Fascist state to be what Mussolini said she was, a sentient being with a mind, heart, and spirity of her own, an entity that evolves.

If there is a good leader who knows what is best for society , it's best he be a benevolent Fascist Dictator, and people don't speak against his regime, and if he is wiser and more gifted than other politicians, he/she should remain in power , because voting can be mob rule.

If the people are immoral and unintelligent, Certain liberty can be destructive.

But I like your posts.
 
I love you. Mussolini loves you.

Nobody chooses their color.

Mussolini was a dark Mediterranean Italian who wasn't part of Hitler's master race.

The Roman Empire he was trying to resurrect included North Africa.

I have nothing against what a black person looks like. Have you encountered racism? I have too.

Ya know what. You seem like your hearts in the right place, you just give too much importance to roll models. How's about you learn to love what's left of yourself that is NOT under the influence of Mussolini then get back to me.

Like, I don't get how he doesn't understand that the primary point of contention we have is with their desire to enforce their (theocratic) model of propriety on society, and to invalidate the goals and identities of people who are merely just living their lives harmlessly and joyfully.

Further, perhaps, is his worship of a form of government that makes itself pointedly vulnerable to all the flaws any single ruler may have, and the instabilities over time arising from a turnstile of such flawed humans. It looks great on paper the same way communism does, but in reality it has too many points of failure, either be it in the points of failure exposed and leveraged out of the singular dictator or the points of failure as control slips to oligarchy, with fascism and communism respectively. When you mix the two you end up with something like Russia: a broken economy owned by oligarchs where the bearings will continue until morale improves.

In reality, a combination of self-rule and socialism based on a more reasonable schema of ownership (where the leverage of personal gain against "I own it" means that ownership transfers, commensurate with the force of leverage applied, to those leveraged against): the use of leverage for personal gain ought be an act of implicit sale.

I don't believe anything should be forced unless we have a leader who knows what is best for society. Some things are best to enforce. If it improves the economy, improves unity, creates sound minds, protects innocence, and speaks the truth about violent hate groups like Islam, then enforcing certain laws and rules can save and enhance lives.

Back when America had a censorship on the media and entertainment industry and prayer in schools, there was far fewer suicides, mental illness, and crime. Apparently life wasn't so bad afterall when filth that teaches us to be selfish wasn't promoted in the media and entertainment industry.
 
If there is a good leader who knows what is best for society , it's best he be a benevolent Fascist Dictator, and people don't speak against his regime, and if he is wiser and more gifted than other politicians, he/she should remain in power , because voting can be mob rule.

This might be the most moronic tub of shit you've posted yet in your brief effort to troll this board.

To quote Monty Python, supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses. Or as Jefferson put it "the consent of the governed."

A dictator of any stripe - fascist, benevolent or otherwise - ignores the source of legitimate government power and simply declares "I know what's best for everyone, and anyone else can fuck right off."

Thing is, it isn't up to the dictator to decide "what's best for society." That's for society to decide collectively. And if society decides that said dictator (no matter how benevolent) needs to be lined up against a wall and shot, then that's the correct path moving forward.
 
If there is a good leader who knows what is best for society , it's best he be a benevolent Fascist Dictator, and people don't speak against his regime, and if he is wiser and more gifted than other politicians, he/she should remain in power , because voting can be mob rule.

This might be the most moronic tub of shit you've posted yet in your brief effort to troll this board.

To quote Monty Python, supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses. Or as Jefferson put it "the consent of the governed."

A dictator of any stripe - fascist, benevolent or otherwise - ignores the source of legitimate government power and simply declares "I know what's best for everyone, and anyone else can fuck right off."

Thing is, it isn't up to the dictator to decide "what's best for society." That's for society to decide collectively. And if society decides that said dictator (no matter how benevolent) needs to be lined up against a wall and shot, then that's the correct path moving forward.

No, that's bullshit.

So, if 90% of the people want pedophilia and crystal meth to be legal, it should be?
 
Pornography creates perverts who will want to act out their fantasies. Don't act like it wasn't safer in America when porn was illegal and that porn doesn't have a role to play.

That's not true. It's the reverse. If you cover women up and ban porn you get more violent sex crimes. Which is supported by statistics. In every society that liberalizes sexuality sex crimes fall.

Don't confuse visibility with occurrence. I've had a lot of sex with women around the world. The most perverse and kinky are women who grew up in Catholic countries and Muslim countries. All that sexual moralization mess with their heads and make them sex freaks given the first opportunity.

If you force everyone to cover up and not have sex you have guaranteed that people will think of little else all day. Give them free access to porn and they will likely get more productive hobbies. I'm not the only one who has drawn this conclusion.

I understand where your idea comes from. It's using the metaphor of disease on ideas. It's the sane stupid, idea that rules the West today where they think if they hear ideas they disagree with they risk turning evil.

Its also narcissistic. You are presumably aware that you aren't affected by porn this way. You've seen it yet have rejected it. But you think you are special. It's the other people who are to weak to resist. No, you are not special. Other people are also capable of it.

I used to love porn. I hot bored with it. Now I don't watch porn. For me sexuality is, about human connection. This is something porn taught me. So I still think its, good for society

When America had censorship laws we weren't the serial killer capitol of earth. In fact, back in Bob Hope's younger days, when you didn't even hear "fuck" on TV or the radio, I don't recall serial killers in America, which is remarkable because I used to read an encyclopedia of Serial killers. I can't think of one back then but I'm probably wrong.

Why did I read an encyclopedia of Serial killers?

I grew up in a leftist liberal household with porn readily available. I was exposed to porn age 8. I wasn't a sexual pervert prior to that.

Immediately I became obsessed with objectifying, disrespecting, and degrading women. A year later I was having violent fantasies. By age ten I was having serial killer fantasies.

By age 12 I was a sociopath with a criminal record (though I have never committed a sexual offense, in my heart I was a mass murderer. I am without a doubt pornography was what fucked me up because of how quickly I became perverted right after exposure to it, and how innocent I was prior to that.)

Because back in the day serial killers weren't caught. Forensic techniques weren't good enough to track them down or even identify victims as connected. The problem with serial killers is that their victims are often spread out over a large area with no connection to the killer. It was just easy to get away with it. That's why the concept of serial killers is a modern one. Or they could become mercenaries and fight in wars. Back in the day one of the perks of being a soldier was all the raping you were allowed to do.

I recommend the book "Better angels of our nature" by Stephen Pinker. He goes through the development of violence in society and how it's steadily been declining throughout history. That includes violent sexual crime.

What has changed is societies honesty about what is going on. People are speaking up and sharing the thoughts in their heads. If they had done that earlier we would have known about it earlier.

The torturers in Fascist Italy did horrific and degrading things to the political prisoners. They didn't have any accessible porn to help motivate their cruelty and sexual perversions. They found it within them anyway. Somehow. Absolute power corrupts absolutely.

I think you read an encyclopedia of serial killers because you are a normal person. It's normal to be attracted by what is taboo. It's fascinating. All people need to introspect and think about if they are or aren't serial killers and why. We all need to understand why we would or wouldn't do certain things. Reading about that which is extreme or taboo helps us understand ourselves.

Men fantasizing about objectifying, disrespecting, and degrading women I also think is normal for the above reasons. It's only fantasies. It's harmless. Normal people have no problem with telling fantasy from fiction.

When people have mental problems it's tempting to blame it on a trauma early in life. I'm not saying it can't be true. But that's the old Freudian model for understanding psychology. Modern psychology is a bit more sophisticated. Human behaviour is complex and we can do strange things for seemingly unconnected reaasons. I think you have created a simply story to explain the trouble you had as a kid.

I too thought I was a sadistic psycho potential rapist when I was a teenager. Until I lost my virginity. When I learned that all those things I thought were unspeakably evil and depraved, a lot of women were into. And then over night I thought I was a normal and well adjusted young man.

At no point are children innocent little flowers. We start out evil (narcisistic and self obsessed little psychopaths) and have to be taught to be good. I'm exaggerating for effect. But only slightly. We evolved for surviving naked on the African plains and have instincts to suit that environment. If we were born innocent little flowers our species would have died out a long time ago.
 
When America had censorship laws we weren't the serial killer capitol of earth. In fact, back in Bob Hope's younger days, when you didn't even hear "fuck" on TV or the radio, I don't recall serial killers in America, which is remarkable because I used to read an encyclopedia of Serial killers. I can't think of one back then but I'm probably wrong.

Why did I read an encyclopedia of Serial killers?

I grew up in a leftist liberal household with porn readily available. I was exposed to porn age 8. I wasn't a sexual pervert prior to that.

Immediately I became obsessed with objectifying, disrespecting, and degrading women. A year later I was having violent fantasies. By age ten I was having serial killer fantasies.

By age 12 I was a sociopath with a criminal record (though I have never committed a sexual offense, in my heart I was a mass murderer. I am without a doubt pornography was what fucked me up because of how quickly I became perverted right after exposure to it, and how innocent I was prior to that.)

Because back in the day serial killers weren't caught. Forensic techniques weren't good enough to track them down or even identify victims as connected. The problem with serial killers is that their victims are often spread out over a large area with no connection to the killer. It was just easy to get away with it. That's why the concept of serial killers is a modern one. Or they could become mercenaries and fight in wars. Back in the day one of the perks of being a soldier was all the raping you were allowed to do.

I recommend the book "Better angels of our nature" by Stephen Pinker. He goes through the development of violence in society and how it's steadily been declining throughout history. That includes violent sexual crime.

What has changed is societies honesty about what is going on. People are speaking up and sharing the thoughts in their heads. If they had done that earlier we would have known about it earlier.

The torturers in Fascist Italy did horrific and degrading things to the political prisoners. They didn't have any accessible porn to help motivate their cruelty and sexual perversions. They found it within them anyway. Somehow. Absolute power corrupts absolutely.

I think you read an encyclopedia of serial killers because you are a normal person. It's normal to be attracted by what is taboo. It's fascinating. All people need to introspect and think about if they are or aren't serial killers and why. We all need to understand why we would or wouldn't do certain things. Reading about that which is extreme or taboo helps us understand ourselves.

Men fantasizing about objectifying, disrespecting, and degrading women I also think is normal for the above reasons. It's only fantasies. It's harmless. Normal people have no problem with telling fantasy from fiction.

When people have mental problems it's tempting to blame it on a trauma early in life. I'm not saying it can't be true. But that's the old Freudian model for understanding psychology. Modern psychology is a bit more sophisticated. Human behaviour is complex and we can do strange things for seemingly unconnected reaasons. I think you have created a simply story to explain the trouble you had as a kid.

I too thought I was a sadistic psycho potential rapist when I was a teenager. Until I lost my virginity. When I learned that all those things I thought were unspeakably evil and depraved, a lot of women were into. And then over night I thought I was a normal and well adjusted young man.

At no point are children innocent little flowers. We start out evil (narcisistic and self obsessed little psychopaths) and have to be taught to be good. I'm exaggerating for effect. But only slightly. We evolved for surviving naked on the African plains and have instincts to suit that environment. If we were born innocent little flowers our species would have died out a long time ago.

I like the post , I just highly doubt it's accurate. For instance, if there was a single school shooting in the 19 30-40's we obviously would know about it.

Also , suicide and mental illness has gone up a lot just in my lifetime.

And Sweden didn't used to have the nickname "rape Capitol", where 1 in four Swedish women are raped approximately.

But I believe your post has some merit. Do you sympathize with Marxism?
 
I like the post , I just highly doubt it's accurate. For instance, if there was a single school shooting in the 19 30-40's we obviously would know about it.

That type of violence was much more common in the past. Knifings was a huge problem. What changed was access to guns. USA has a high degree of teens having access to guns. So the results of that is predictable. If we'd have the same access to guns 150 years ago, we'd be seeing much more school shooting back then than what we have today. Life was incredibly cheap back then. People were murdered left and right for the most trivial reasons.

Also , suicide and mental illness has gone up a lot just in my lifetime.

Not accurate. Most of the mentally ill 100 years ago were sufferers of syphilis. We have a cure for syphilis now.

A lot of mental illness diagnosises were first diagnosed not that long ago. When I was young ADHD wasn't a thing. Autism was only diagnosed when it was quite extreme. We are much better at identifying mental illness now. Which explain the increase. Or to put it in simple terms. We have no idea how common mental illness useed to be.

Suicide statistics are complete bullshit. We have no idea how common suicides are. In cultures where it's shameful to commit suicide doctors are kind enough to interpret suicides as accidents. And this is most cultures. Japan is a famous outliar, with a culture that thinks suicides is an honorable way to go. Unsurprisingly they top the charts. I'm assuming that they don't really have more suicides there than elsewhere.

And Sweden didn't used to have the nickname "rape Capitol", where 1 in four Swedish women are raped approximately.

This has been explained a million times now. Sweden collects rape statistics differently than other countries. That's why the high number. Before 2010 we had comparatibly low rape rates. After 2010 they shot up. Which is when we started to collect the statistics differently. People who write articles about the high rape prevalence in Sweden are always disingenuous and have a habit of comparing statistics 1:1 as if they are collected in the same way.

Do you sympathize with Marxism?

It's hard to answer, since that man has shaped our modern world. We live in a Marxist society now, all the west. But we take it for granted now that we have forgotten where the ideas come from. The idea that technical innovation is the driver of historical events (rather than genius great men showing up) is a Marxist idea. And is seen as so obvious today that we assume that's just the natural way of interpreting history. This is known as a Materialistic reading of history.

Marx and Marxism is so intrinsic to modern society that it's today hard to say what is Marxism and what isn't. The fact that USSR redefined Marx to suit their own needs doesn't help in understanding him. They treated him as a patron saint, which hasn't been helpful in understanding his work or it's relevance.

But I don't identify as a Marxist necessarily. He's just one in a long row of thinkers that have changed the world for the better (and sometimes for the worse). I'm a bigger fan of Nietzsche for instance. And identify more with being a liberal than with being Marxist. Yes, there is a difference.
 
That type of violence was much more common in the past. Knifings was a huge problem. What changed was access to guns. USA has a high degree of teens having access to guns. So the results of that is predictable. If we'd have the same access to guns 150 years ago, we'd be seeing much more school shooting back then than what we have today. Life was incredibly cheap back then. People were murdered left and right for the most trivial reasons.



Not accurate. Most of the mentally ill 100 years ago were sufferers of syphilis. We have a cure for syphilis now.

A lot of mental illness diagnosises were first diagnosed not that long ago. When I was young ADHD wasn't a thing. Autism was only diagnosed when it was quite extreme. We are much better at identifying mental illness now. Which explain the increase. Or to put it in simple terms. We have no idea how common mental illness useed to be.

Suicide statistics are complete bullshit. We have no idea how common suicides are. In cultures where it's shameful to commit suicide doctors are kind enough to interpret suicides as accidents. And this is most cultures. Japan is a famous outliar, with a culture that thinks suicides is an honorable way to go. Unsurprisingly they top the charts. I'm assuming that they don't really have more suicides there than elsewhere.

And Sweden didn't used to have the nickname "rape Capitol", where 1 in four Swedish women are raped approximately.

This has been explained a million times now. Sweden collects rape statistics differently than other countries. That's why the high number. Before 2010 we had comparatibly low rape rates. After 2010 they shot up. Which is when we started to collect the statistics differently. People who write articles about the high rape prevalence in Sweden are always disingenuous and have a habit of comparing statistics 1:1 as if they are collected in the same way.

Do you sympathize with Marxism?

It's hard to answer, since that man has shaped our modern world. We live in a Marxist society now, all the west. But we take it for granted now that we have forgotten where the ideas come from. The idea that technical innovation is the driver of historical events (rather than genius great men showing up) is a Marxist idea. And is seen as so obvious today that we assume that's just the natural way of interpreting history. This is known as a Materialistic reading of history.

Marx and Marxism is so intrinsic to modern society that it's today hard to say what is Marxism and what isn't. The fact that USSR redefined Marx to suit their own needs doesn't help in understanding him. They treated him as a patron saint, which hasn't been helpful in understanding his work or it's relevance.

But I don't identify as a Marxist necessarily. He's just one in a long row of thinkers that have changed the world for the better (and sometimes for the worse). I'm a bigger fan of Nietzsche for instance. And identify more with being a liberal than with being Marxist. Yes, there is a difference.

I believe there is some truth to all of what you say. I don't accept it as Gospel truth. I don't accept anything as Gospel truth.

However, Islam has been at war with the world since it was founded. Yeah yeah , there is stupid shit and violence in Scripture, but Jesus was nothing like Muhammad. Jesus forgave those who crucified him and rebuked his Apostles for taking up swords to defend him.

Muhammad cut off heads and hands and was a terrorist.

Muslims have been trying to rape and pillage Europe as the Moors and Ottoman Empire for many Centuries, and almost succeeded were it not for the Turkish fleet getting sunk at Lepanto.

Many Muslim immigrants going into Europe have never seen an unveiled woman before, and where they come from it is okay to gang rape unveiled women. I'm 100% convinced this is the primary cause of the rape epidemic in Sweden and Europe.

So, you live in Sweden? I'm part Swedish.

Also, have you ever read this:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Our_Lady_of_Fátima

I could never be a Marxist after studying that, going there as a child, and experiencing the power of Marian devotion and the Rosary. Our Lady of Fatima said the errors of Russia would spread throughout the world , and worked a miracle that many atheists said they witnessed.

Now, nothing happened to the sun. It was a vision, A sign promised to all who showed up at that time and that location. The prophecy of the coming of World War 2 and the Spread of Communism throughout the world was contained in the message to illiterate Shepherd children who should have never known about or been thinking about such matters.
 
That type of violence was much more common in the past. Knifings was a huge problem. What changed was access to guns. USA has a high degree of teens having access to guns. So the results of that is predictable. If we'd have the same access to guns 150 years ago, we'd be seeing much more school shooting back then than what we have today. Life was incredibly cheap back then. People were murdered left and right for the most trivial reasons.



Not accurate. Most of the mentally ill 100 years ago were sufferers of syphilis. We have a cure for syphilis now.

A lot of mental illness diagnosises were first diagnosed not that long ago. When I was young ADHD wasn't a thing. Autism was only diagnosed when it was quite extreme. We are much better at identifying mental illness now. Which explain the increase. Or to put it in simple terms. We have no idea how common mental illness useed to be.

Suicide statistics are complete bullshit. We have no idea how common suicides are. In cultures where it's shameful to commit suicide doctors are kind enough to interpret suicides as accidents. And this is most cultures. Japan is a famous outliar, with a culture that thinks suicides is an honorable way to go. Unsurprisingly they top the charts. I'm assuming that they don't really have more suicides there than elsewhere.



This has been explained a million times now. Sweden collects rape statistics differently than other countries. That's why the high number. Before 2010 we had comparatibly low rape rates. After 2010 they shot up. Which is when we started to collect the statistics differently. People who write articles about the high rape prevalence in Sweden are always disingenuous and have a habit of comparing statistics 1:1 as if they are collected in the same way.



It's hard to answer, since that man has shaped our modern world. We live in a Marxist society now, all the west. But we take it for granted now that we have forgotten where the ideas come from. The idea that technical innovation is the driver of historical events (rather than genius great men showing up) is a Marxist idea. And is seen as so obvious today that we assume that's just the natural way of interpreting history. This is known as a Materialistic reading of history.

Marx and Marxism is so intrinsic to modern society that it's today hard to say what is Marxism and what isn't. The fact that USSR redefined Marx to suit their own needs doesn't help in understanding him. They treated him as a patron saint, which hasn't been helpful in understanding his work or it's relevance.

But I don't identify as a Marxist necessarily. He's just one in a long row of thinkers that have changed the world for the better (and sometimes for the worse). I'm a bigger fan of Nietzsche for instance. And identify more with being a liberal than with being Marxist. Yes, there is a difference.

I believe there is some truth to all of what you say. I don't accept it as Gospel truth. I don't accept anything as Gospel truth.

However, Islam has been at war with the world since it was founded. Yeah yeah , there is stupid shit and violence in Scripture, but Jesus was nothing like Muhammad. Jesus forgave those who crucified him and rebuked his Apostles for taking up swords to defend him.

Muhammad cut off heads and hands and was a terrorist.

Muslims have been trying to rape and pillage Europe as the Moors and Ottoman Empire for many Centuries, and almost succeeded were it not for the Turkish fleet getting sunk at Lepanto.

Many Muslim immigrants going into Europe have never seen an unveiled woman before, and where they come from it is okay to gang rape unveiled women. I'm 100% convinced this is the primary cause of the rape epidemic in Sweden and Europe.

So, you live in Sweden? I'm part Swedish.

Also, have you ever read this:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Our_Lady_of_Fátima

I could never be a Marxist after studying that, going there as a child, and experiencing the power of Marian devotion and the Rosary. Our Lady of Fatima said the errors of Russia would spread throughout the world , and worked a miracle that many atheists said they witnessed.

Now, nothing happened to the sun. It was a vision, A sign promised to all who showed up at that time and that location. The prophecy of the coming of World War 2 and the Spread of Communism throughout the world was contained in the message to illiterate Shepherd children who should have never known about or been thinking about such matters.

I think you missed the Jesus being son of god part. Jesus forgiving people doesn't erase all the abortions his father performed prior to his arrival. Ya know great flood, fireballing cities, pillaging and taking woman & children as property. That wonderful stuff that makes one take Jesus and his forgiveness seriously.
 
Back
Top Bottom