Jarhyn
Wizard
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2010
- Messages
- 17,455
- Gender
- Androgyne; they/them
- Basic Beliefs
- Natural Philosophy, Game Theoretic Ethicist
I love you. Mussolini loves you.
Nobody chooses their color.
Mussolini was a dark Mediterranean Italian who wasn't part of Hitler's master race.
The Roman Empire he was trying to resurrect included North Africa.
I have nothing against what a black person looks like. Have you encountered racism? I have too.
Ya know what. You seem like your hearts in the right place, you just give too much importance to roll models. How's about you learn to love what's left of yourself that is NOT under the influence of Mussolini then get back to me.
Like, I don't get how he doesn't understand that the primary point of contention we have is with their desire to enforce their (theocratic) model of propriety on society, and to invalidate the goals and identities of people who are merely just living their lives harmlessly and joyfully.
Further, perhaps, is his worship of a form of government that makes itself pointedly vulnerable to all the flaws any single ruler may have, and the instabilities over time arising from a turnstile of such flawed humans. It looks great on paper the same way communism does, but in reality it has too many points of failure, either be it in the points of failure exposed and leveraged out of the singular dictator or the points of failure as control slips to oligarchy, with fascism and communism respectively. When you mix the two you end up with something like Russia: a broken economy owned by oligarchs where the bearings will continue until morale improves.
In reality, a combination of self-rule and socialism based on a more reasonable schema of ownership (where the leverage of personal gain against "I own it" means that ownership transfers, commensurate with the force of leverage applied, to those leveraged against): the use of leverage for personal gain ought be an act of implicit sale.