• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Utah considers bill that would install anti-porn filters on new phones

ZiprHead

Looney Running The Asylum
Staff member
Joined
Oct 22, 2002
Messages
46,987
Location
Frozen in Michigan
Gender
Old Fart
Basic Beliefs
Don't be a dick.
The restriction is part of a long-running campaign against pornography by Utah's conservative lawmakers.

Measure HB72 states that every tablet and smartphone sold in the state after January 1st, 2022 should come with a preinstalled content filter capable of "blocking material that is harmful to minors." Adults would be able to turn off the filter for specific content. However, the restriction can not go into effect until five other states have passed similar measures.

The bill is part of an ongoing anti-pornography campaign by Utah's conservative lawmakers. In 2016, Utah passed a resolution declaring porn a public health crisis, with 15 additional states following its lead including Florida, Idaho Arizona and Montana.

Supporters of the content filter claim that while most devices already come with parental controls, many people struggle with enabling them, reports the Associated Press. Critics say the bill is an attack on free speech and claim the broader movement against pornography ignores more pressing issues, such as the need for better sexual education. It also seems unlikely that device makers, such as Apple, who have previously clashed with law enforcement over civil liberties, will simply bow to Utah's demands.

This week in the strange death of the USA.
 
Porn on a phone? Maybe it is just me, but if you can't leave your house without access to porn, there might be a problem. Not that Utah's proposal is anything worth considering. If right-wing porn is legal on phones, why not actual porn?
 
Spectrum employee: No, sorry, we don't sell phones or tablets anymore, just connectivity service. However, we can loan you this phone long enough to order one from our store in Colorado....
Customer: Dash it all! I shall convey my commerce to thy rivals across the way!
SE: Sure thing, sir. You'll be happy to kniw all their stuff ships from Florida.
 
Is this any more passable than the proposal from the UK feminist proposing a 6pm curfew for males?

Or is it just another politician grandstanding for their base?
Tom
 
Is this any more passable than the proposal from the UK feminist proposing a 6pm curfew for males?

Or is it just another politician grandstanding for their base?
Tom
The main difference being elected officials are looking over this proposal in Utah.
 
Porn on a phone? Maybe it is just me, but if you can't leave your house without access to porn, there might be a problem.

Some people (in Australia at any rate) do not have cable/fibre based 'physical' internet at their houses with an ISP, and instead use their mobile phone as a hotspot to access the internet from other devices when they're at home.
 
Is this any more passable than the proposal from the UK feminist proposing a 6pm curfew for males?

Or is it just another politician grandstanding for their base?
Tom

They have an anti-porn coalition.

https://utahcoalition.org/

They also have one of the highest per capita rates of porn consumption, by state. I doubt that requiring Utah phone buyers to go to out-of-state suppliers will please the Utah phone retailers much.

Which is why I doubt this will go any further than the feminist proposal to put a curfew on men. It might sound good to the low information/high ideology voters. But it won't really go anywhere else.
Tom
 
Is this any more passable than the proposal from the UK feminist proposing a 6pm curfew for males?
The Utah senate is Republican 23 to 6.
The House is Republican 59 to 16.
Supermajorities.
The only way for this not to pass a vote would be for a lot of Republicans to effectively say they'd rather have porn.
Available to kids.
And babysitters.
During church.
Because of course that's how opponents will spin it.
 
Is this any more passable than the proposal from the UK feminist proposing a 6pm curfew for males?
The Utah senate is Republican 23 to 6.
The House is Republican 59 to 16.
Supermajorities.
The only way for this not to pass a vote would be for a lot of Republicans to effectively say they'd rather have porn.
Available to kids.
And babysitters.
During church.
Because of course that's how opponents will spin it.

Or,
for it to quietly die in committee because Wal-Mart et al. doesn't want it to happen.
Tom
 
Or,
for it to quietly die in committee because Wal-Mart et al. doesn't want it to happen.
Tom
Wal-Mart? The store that sold bowlderized versions of popular movies, taking the nudity and language out?
Why would thery care if people need extra effort to achieve porn?
 
Or,
for it to quietly die in committee because Wal-Mart et al. doesn't want it to happen.
Tom
Wal-Mart? The store that sold bowlderized versions of popular movies, taking the nudity and language out?
Why would thery care if people need extra effort to achieve porn?

Because if people bought stuff elsewhere, they'd lose profits.

It's not difficult to understand.
Tom
 
Or,
for it to quietly die in committee because Wal-Mart et al. doesn't want it to happen.
Tom
Wal-Mart? The store that sold bowlderized versions of popular movies, taking the nudity and language out?
Why would thery care if people need extra effort to achieve porn?

Because if people bought stuff elsewhere, they'd lose profits.

It's not difficult to understand.
Tom
No, but WalMart also has an anti-porn policy.

I'm sure any decent mercantile will figure a loophole around such legislation. In-store pick-up of tablets technically sold out of Nevada, warehoused in Salt Lake or something.
And everyone in Utah will have the same obstacles. The biggest stores will have a bigger advantage in such games. Allosing them to further crush any local opposition that doesn't exist in other time zones.
 
Or,
for it to quietly die in committee because Wal-Mart et al. doesn't want it to happen.
Tom
Wal-Mart? The store that sold bowlderized versions of popular movies, taking the nudity and language out?
Why would thery care if people need extra effort to achieve porn?

Huh? This is the first I've heard of that.
 
Or,
for it to quietly die in committee because Wal-Mart et al. doesn't want it to happen.
Tom
Wal-Mart? The store that sold bowlderized versions of popular movies, taking the nudity and language out?
Why would thery care if people need extra effort to achieve porn?

Huh? This is the first I've heard of that.
Really? It was a big deal a while back. Quite a while now that i think on it. God, i am old.
They basically acquired the made-for-TV versions of hot releases but did not label them clearly as not-quite-the-original.
They have agreements with record companies to actually produce clean versions of their albums for sale specificzlly in WalMart.
 
Huh? This is the first I've heard of that.
Really? It was a big deal a while back. Quite a while now that i think on it. God, i am old.
They basically acquired the made-for-TV versions of hot releases but did not label them clearly as not-quite-the-original.
They have agreements with record companies to actually produce clean versions of their albums for sale specificzlly in WalMart.

Huh, another reason to avoid wally world like the plague.
 
Back
Top Bottom