Jimmy Higgins
Contributor
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2001
- Messages
- 50,632
- Basic Beliefs
- Calvinistic Atheist
The Supreme Court of the United States has announced they'll be hearing their first major 2nd Amendment case since tossing precedence out of the window in their landmark Heller v DC case.
The question, can the Government restrict possession of weapons on their turf, specifically, are Americans provided the inalienable right to concealed carry.
So it comes down to where is a citizen not allowed to conceal carry a weapon for "protection". The argument is, what good is having a gun for protection, if you can't carry it for protection. If Nick Fury's father carried a gun to protect his tips, why not everyone else?
Sure the heck to me, I'd be possibly okay with conceal carry being a thing, if it required actual training and field tested accuracy. Wanting to carry a concealed weapon shouldn't be enough to justify being allowed to conceal carry a weapon. Why anyone would shrug to the potential public health risk of idiots with guns and the Government's lack of reasonable interest in it is beyond my imagination.
The question, can the Government restrict possession of weapons on their turf, specifically, are Americans provided the inalienable right to concealed carry.
So it comes down to where is a citizen not allowed to conceal carry a weapon for "protection". The argument is, what good is having a gun for protection, if you can't carry it for protection. If Nick Fury's father carried a gun to protect his tips, why not everyone else?
Sure the heck to me, I'd be possibly okay with conceal carry being a thing, if it required actual training and field tested accuracy. Wanting to carry a concealed weapon shouldn't be enough to justify being allowed to conceal carry a weapon. Why anyone would shrug to the potential public health risk of idiots with guns and the Government's lack of reasonable interest in it is beyond my imagination.