I already explained in post #188
Even creationists do better than that.
Repeating that Metaphor thinks it's "fucking bullshit" is no explanation, it's just RW extremist bluster. Throwing in your best ten dollar word (ability to be praised by Meta is the metric of Metalaudability) doesn't explain anything; it's an adjective. I know you have plenty of invective to toss about, but you have not even touched the question of what is "evil" about the insight expressed in the meme. As I pointed out, with the minor syntax mod, it's literally the truth. Without that mod, it's just slightly hyperbolic. But it is a Force For Good, and your criticism is evil.
Bringing attention to wrong, that it might not be repeated, is an affront to those who would repeat it.
Warning against repeating history is not evil
It's not rocket science.
.
Especially when there is a real and present danger in the form of a major American political party that is cleft unto autocracy and white supremacy (evil), and will most likely control the government for six years beginning in one year.
Just as an exercise you might imagine...
Do you think there is more than one person who wants to do it again?
Do you think that person approves of banning "Maus"?
If you answer no to either of those, you are most certainly nwrt.
If you concede that there is more than one white supremacist, neo nazi, whatever, who would approve of banning "Maus", then you are abetting the evil described in the book by describing the meme as evil.